140 likes | 259 Views
Generative Justice versus Distributive Justice : a crucial distinction for guiding engineering towards a more peaceful and democratic world. The term “justice” well accepted in the discourse of individual rights Criminal law violation – “lawbreaker was brought to justice”
E N D
Generative Justice versus Distributive Justice: a crucial distinction for guiding engineering towards a more peaceful and democratic world
The term “justice” well accepted in the discourse of individual rights Criminal law violation – “lawbreaker was brought to justice” Civil rights violation – “this will deny their right to vote” International human rights violations—“injustice by dictator X in arresting his political opponents”
The term “justice” is less accepted in cases of social justice Define social justice as “Increasing equity of risk and resource distribution among different social groups”
The term “justice” is less easily accepted in cases of social justice • Examples: • Environmental degradation: low-income communities should not bear greater health risks than high-income communities • College admissions: black students should not be admitted at lower rates than white students • Health budgets: men’s disease should not be funded at a higher rate than women’s disease
Critics of social justice • Individual responsibility: if more people in low-income communities choose to smoke, they should bear responsibility for that choice • Meritocracy: If my grades are high it is due to my talent and hard work; thus college admissions should reflect that and nothing else. • Reverse discrimination: prostate cancer and breast cancer occur at about the same rate, but funding for breast cancer is about double that of prostate cancer
Critics of social justice “Democrats want to fight over who gets the biggest slice of pie, but we Republicans want to bake a bigger pie for everyone”
Confusion over social justice in the case of Open Source Software Kevin Kelly is wrong: Open source software does not fit the category of “socialism” Yet it is relevant to “social justice” – how do we resolve this contradiction?
Socialism is based on distributive social justice • Money appears to be a self-generating source of value • Actually money disguises the true source of value: self-generating capacity of labor and nature • Capitalism extracts self-generated value, creating injustice and alienation • Capitalism raises profits by "externalizing" costs, damaging health and environment
Socialism is based on distributive social justice • Socialism attempts to return that surplus value by state ownership • Liberalism attempts to return that surplus value by taxes
Generative justice reconfigures the flow of value Before the software developers labor value can be privatized (extracted) Open Source ensures it is publically distributed
Generative social justice offers the same opportunities for the self-generating value of nature
Why should small scale waste recycling be better than large scale industrial waste systems? Because the small-scale case offers greater opportunity for Generative justice
Generative social justiceIncreasing the public capacity for self-generating practices and resources Social entrepreneurship: capital at the service of social justice Generative public spaces: Community gardens, murals Generative technologies: DIY, Maker-faire, Arduino, fan fiction, citizen journalism Generative educative practices: Recovering heritage, history, futures