1 / 13

Biosensors and Carbon Nanotubes

Biosensors and Carbon Nanotubes. Lakshmi Jagannathan. Enzyme-Coated Carbon Nanotubes as Single-Molecule Bionsensors 1. Introduction and Motivation Physical Immobilization of Protein Method/Experimentation Result/Evidence of Immobilization (AFM) Electrical Characteristics

Download Presentation

Biosensors and Carbon Nanotubes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Biosensors and Carbon Nanotubes Lakshmi Jagannathan

  2. Enzyme-Coated Carbon Nanotubes as Single-Molecule Bionsensors1 • Introduction and Motivation • Physical Immobilization of Protein • Method/Experimentation • Result/Evidence of Immobilization (AFM) • Electrical Characteristics • Method/Experimentation • Results and Electrical Characteristics • Conclusion 1Koen Besteman, Jeong-O Lee, Frank G. M. Wiertz, Hendrik A. Heering, and Cees Dekker, Nano Letters, 2003, Vol. 3, No. 6, 727-730.

  3. Introduction and Motivation • Unique properties of single-wall carbon nanotubes can be used for biosensors • Detection of Glucose Oxidase: • important enzyme that catalyzes glucose • necessary to detect the presence of glucose in body fluids • enzyme as an electrode to detect current • Potential applications: highly sensitive, cheap, and smaller glucose monitors and other applications

  4. Physical Immobilization- Method • LINKING MOLECULE: 1-Pyrenebutanoic acid succinimidyl ester– absorbing into the SWNT when left in DMF or dimethylformamide (van der Waals coupling) • Amine bond in protein reacts with amide group from linking molecule and immobilizes (covalent bond) Source: Chen, R. J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; Dai, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3838.

  5. A and C: Laser-ablated and CVD growth, respectively; before GOX immobilization B and D: After immobilization of GOX- difference in height before and after= height of GOX molecule Physical Immobilization- Results (AFM)

  6. Electrical Measurements- Method • Electrolyte-gated carbon nanotube transistors • Measurements done in aqueous solution at room temperature • Liquid gate voltage applied between an Ag/AgCl 3M NaCl standard reference electrode and SWNT • Conductance: Source: Rosenblatt, S.; Yaish, Y.; Park, J.; Gore, J.; Sazonova, V.; McEuen, P. L. Nano Lett. 2002, 2, 869.

  7. Black: bare SWNT Green/Red: 2h and 4h in DMF Electron-donating power of DMF Dark Blue: With linking molecule on surface Light Blue: After Gox immobilization Electrical Characteristics- Results

  8. SWNT as an excellent nanosize pH sensor Without Gox Immobilization, cannnot tell difference between different pH After Gox, conductance increases for higher pH Gate voltage changes by 20mV- conductance changes Sensitivity due to charged groups on Gox that become more negative with increasing pH Electrical Characteristics- Results

  9. Real time electronic response Adding water  no conductance shift Adding Glucose and after activity of Gox conductance shifts Inset a– another device Inset b– bare SWNT without immobilization of Gox, but just the addition of glucose Electrical Characteristics- Results

  10. Conclusion • SWNT can be used as an enzymatic-activity sensor • SWNT can also be used as a pH sensor • This first demonstration of biosensors provides a new tool for enzymatic studies and highlights the potential for SWNT to be used for biomolecular diagnostics

  11. References • Besteman, K.; Lee, J.; Wiertz, F. G. M. ; Heering, H. A.; Dekker, C.; Nano Letters, 2003, Vol. 3, No. 6, 727-730. • Rosenblatt, S.; Yaish, Y.; Park, J.; Gore, J.; Sazonova, V.; McEuen, P. L. Nano Lett. 2002, 2, 869. • Chen, R. J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; Dai, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3838.

  12. Thank You!Questions?

  13. Extra Slides • pH sensor: Figure 3. The pH was set by using 0.1 mM HCl in milli-Q water (pH 4) and 0.1 mM KCl in milli-Q water (pH 5.5). For all measurements the source-drain voltage was kept at 9.1 mV. It is seen that the conductance increases with increasing pH and that pH changes induce a reversible change in the conductance.

More Related