90 likes | 98 Views
Explore the successes and challenges of welfare reform in New York, with a focus on the need to move beyond entitlement and implement stronger work-focused programs. Discover potential solutions to further raise work levels, reduce dependency, and rebuild aid systems.
E N D
What’s Next for Welfare in New York? Lawrence M. Mead Department of Politics New York University
Nationally, welfare reform has meant: • Tougher requirements on recipients: • Work tests. • Stronger sanctions. • Time limits. • More benefits to support work. • Favorable effects: • Higher work levels. • Caseload fall. • Lower poverty.
New York’s results are similar: • Statewide: • Caseload fall of around 60%, 1995-2005 • Sharp fall in child poverty. • In NYC: • Sharp rise in work by disadvantaged mothers. • All public assistance drops 64%, 1995-2005 • Sharp fall in child poverty.
But has NYS really reformed? • State retained partial sanctions. • No time limit. • Work issues delegated to counties. • Division in Albany. • The danger of going backward.
Reauthorization of TANF: • Tougher 50% participation standard. • 60-month Safety Net now included under the work test. • NYS’s participation rate—adequate to date. • But reaching 50% will be difficult due to: • Partial sanction. • Lack of a time limit. • The election is unlikely to change this.
What to do now? • Abandon entitlement: • Move to full family sanctions. • Phase out 60-month Safety Net for families. • Possible lesser changes. • Replace entitlement with casework. • Improve welfare work programs.
Would this cause hardship? • The vast majority of recipients can work. • Work first is better than training. • Honoring the constitutional commitment to the needy.
Beyond entitlement: • Needy families should go to work first. • Then government can do more to help them. • Goal should be to: • Raise work levels further. • Reduce dependency. • Rebuild aid on the other side of entitlement. • Candidates need to address how to do this. • New York could lead.