1 / 18

United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics

ESCM Chapter 8: Data Quality and Metadata. United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics. 8 th Oslo Group Meeting, Baku, Azerbaijan 24-27 September 2013. Background ESCM Chapter 8 outline Comments from OG7 and VM3 Chapter structure and content Changes to quality dimensions

josephinep
Download Presentation

United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ESCM Chapter 8: Data Quality and Metadata United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics 8th Oslo Group Meeting, Baku, Azerbaijan 24-27 September 2013

  2. Background ESCM Chapter 8 outline Comments from OG7 and VM3 Chapter structure and content Changes to quality dimensions Examples/issues of data quality Metadata and examples General Statistical Business Process Model and examples of implementation Next steps Outline of the presentation

  3. Provide guidance on the compilation of energy indicators and the preparation of metadata for energy statistics: A. Data quality indicators for energy statistics B. Metadata Description of metadata specific to energy statistics Presentation and dissemination of metadata Background – ESCM Chapter 8 outline

  4. OG7: Specific energy issues that will affect quality. The challenges with consistency within energy statistics itself and in relation to other statistical areas. The practice of using secondary sources for validating purposes. The use of the balances as a quality check. General Statistical Business Process Model to include administrative data sources. Quality in a decentralised model vs. a centralised system. Guidance for countries that do not have yet a well developed energy system. Comments from OG7

  5. VM3: Overall good description of data quality and metadata. Incorporate energy specific examples and references to energy issues. Comments from VM3

  6. Three main sections to the chapter Data quality Metadata Ensuring data quality and metadata using the General Statistical Business Process Model (GSBPM) Each section followed by energy related examples Chapter structure and content

  7. Changes to quality dimensions Updated data quality dimensions and indicators for measuring quality from UN’s International Recommendations for Energy Statistics. Dynamic elements Non-response Coverage Sampling • Static elements • Relevance • Credibility/objectivity • Accuracy • Timeliness • Coherence • Accessibility • Other dimension of quality for metadata: • Interpretability

  8. Statistics Austria’s country practice on Energy Balances for Austria and the Laender of Austria. Report on Energy Supply and Demand (RESD) from Statistics Canada. Use of standard concepts, definitions, classifications – North American Industry Classification System The Swedish Official Statistics decentralized system. Energy specific examples/issues of data quality

  9. Important for assessing “fitness for use” and ensuring interpretability. Required at every step of the survey process. Critical for enabling comparisons with other data. Used to prescribe definitions, concepts, variables and standards. Supports the harmonization of international surveys and data. Metadata

  10. Statistics Canada’s Integrated Business Statistics Program metadata requirements Development, test, user acceptance testing, production-simulation, and production environments. Two levels of metadata: Global: To support processes and functionalities of all surveys. Survey: Specific to each survey depending on use and purpose. Defining metadata to drive systems. Quality of metadata. Example of metadata

  11. Example of metadata characteristics to drive systems and the GSBPM phases • GSBPM Design phase • 2.1 Design outputs • 2.2 Design variable descriptions • 2.3 Design data collection methodology • 2.4 Design frame and sample methodology • 2.5 Design statistical processing methodology • 2.6 Design production and systems workflow • 1. metadata is defined in the design and build phases of development • 2. high-level concepts underpin system content and metadata is used to describe concepts at various levels of abstraction • 4. metadata is managed through a user interface (or several); metadata concepts underpin the browse functionality for locating information objects, such as variables and questionnaires, and their relationships and attributes • 5. uses centralized management supporting single entry and single source of, e.g. codesets: change once and propagate across system wherever codeset is used, and is flexible, not hard-coded • 8. applies administrative metadata or ‘settings’ at different levels in the system

  12. Example of metadata and quality dimensions

  13. Quality assurance must be built into all stages of the survey process General Statistical Business Process Model (GSBPM) Survey Stages: Specify needs Design Build Collect Process Analyze Disseminate Archive Evaluate

  14. Implementation of GSBPM on crude oil in the State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan Statistics Canada Integrated Business Statistics Program (IBSP) Initiative Redesign of the Business Statistics Program Approximately 120 business surveys including the content redesign of 23 energy surveys. Common sampling, collection and processing methodologies, and sharing of common systems and analytical tools. Will be done in several phases to be completed by 2016. Examples of GSBPM implementation

  15. Data on the activities of refineries and other producers of refined petroleum products. Consultations with clients and respondents across Canada to identify the statistical needs for the future, review of concepts, and respondents’ ability to provide the information requested. New content includes biofuels contained in light fuel oil, diesel and aviation fuel. Meetings with the IBSP collection, processing and analysis working group to identify the processing requirements. IBSP - Monthly Refined Petroleum Products Survey

  16. Report is prepared outlining the sampling methodology, collection strategy, content of the questionnaire and collection edits, standards for classifications and metadata, survey processing, data integration, edit and imputation, adjustments and additions, estimation, reports, dissemination, break in the series, and documentation. The design of electronic questionnaires is starting and field testing will take place this winter with production/collection to be ready for January 2015. IBSP - Monthly Refined Petroleum Products Survey

  17. Determine if need for different or additional energy related examples and issues. Review structure, content, and length of chapter for approval. Next steps…

  18. Andy Kohut, Director Manufacturing and Energy Division Statistics Canada Section B-8, 11th Floor, Jean Talon Building Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1A 0T6 Telephone: 613-951-5858 E-mail: andy.kohut@statcan.gc.ca www.statcan.gc.ca Thank you!

More Related