1 / 26

Introduction to Atom Probe Tomography

Introduction to Atom Probe Tomography. Brian P. Gorman bgorman@mines.edu Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, CSM. Internal Interface Characterization. Need to know: Chemical abruptness Structural roughness (nm spatial resolution)

joshua-franklin
Download Presentation

Introduction to Atom Probe Tomography

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Introduction to Atom Probe Tomography Brian P. Gorman bgorman@mines.edu Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, CSM

  2. Internal Interface Characterization • Need to know: • Chemical abruptness • Structural roughness (nm spatial resolution) • Grain Boundary and Dopant structure (ppm chemical information in nm spaces) • How? • SIMS – nm scale chemical profiling in z-direction except with significant surface roughness, 50nm best resolution x-y, ppb detectability • TEM - Å level spatial resolution, ~1at% best chemical resolution with EDS, EELS • Atom Probe - Å level spatial resolution, 10ppm chemical resolution, data needs reconstruction

  3. Why Atom Probe? Atom Probe

  4. Pulsed High VoltagePulsed Laser Removes Atoms, 1 at a time Layer by Layer Atom Probe Tomography 2D Detector Determines x,y coordinates of atom Data are collected and interpreted Needle-Shaped Specimen 3-Dimensional Reconstructed Model of Specimen z is determined from sequence of evaporation events Time of Flight Determines Atom Type

  5. Atom Probe Detectability Limits • Are there atoms in the field of view? • 100nm diameter FOV is ~100,000atoms / surface • Can we detect each atom? • Cross-wire delay line detector has ~50% collection efficiency • We then capture ~50,000 atoms / surface • Can theoretically detect one atom count above the background, or 1017 to 1018 atoms/cm3

  6. Detectability Limits

  7. Local Electrode Atom Probe (LEAP) • Advantages of putting the counter electrode within close proximity of the specimen • Wider field of view • Lower extraction voltages • MUCH higher acquisition rates

  8. FIB / TEM / LEAP Analysis

  9. LEAP Data Interpretation STEM APT • FIB prepared Al specimens illustrate Ga phase segregation in STEM-HAADF • LEAP illustrates Ga segregation to GBs

  10. APT Process • Specimen Preparation • Dependent upon material evaporation field, electrical properties, thermal properties, cost, throughput • Field Evaporation / Data Collection • Voltage vs. laser pulsing, laser power, pulse fraction, base Temperature, flight path • Reconstruction and Data Analysis • Need to know evaporation field or tip shape (TEM cross correlation), many reconstruction correction algorithms, interpret mass spectrum • Data analysis takes ~3x longer than specimen preparation and collection

  11. Specimen Preparation • Traditionally: • AP primarily used for metallurgical specimens • Electropolishing needle geometries used extensively • Currently: • Focused Ion Beam / SEM • In-situ liftout of site-specific areas • FIB used to final polish 100nm specimens

  12. Atom Probe Specimen Preparation • Deposit a 200 nm thick Pt bar in the FIB • Dimensions: 2 microns wide, 30 – 40 microns long • Start with e-beam Pt (~50nm), then switch to ion beam to minimize Ga damage (~250nm total thickness)

  13. Liftout – Blanket Wafers Second wedge First wedge Cantilever Attach Nanomanipulator Liftout

  14. FIB Specimen Prep II • Site specific sample preparation – 65nm CMOS transistors Acknowledgement UFL and INTEL

  15. Si Microtip Arrays Position sample wedge here Sample wedge Pt weld Microtip post Top-down image of microtip Side-view of LEAP microtip coupon Attach sample to wedge

  16. Slice Sample and Retract Wedge Slice sample from wedge Remainder of wedge is retracted Wedge is aligned to the next microtip and the process is repeated

  17. Atom Probe Liftout B. P. Gorman et al., Microsc. Today, 16 (2008) 42.

  18. Final Sharpening • Want: 100 - 200 nm diameter, >50m long specimen • Have: ~10m2 specimen on post • Annular milling patterns used to remove outer material and leave specimen in the center Ga+

  19. Ion-Solid Interaction Considerations: Ga into Si SRIM 2003 Simulations 30keV 0° incidence 3.7 sputtered Si / incident Ga 30keV 89° incidence 22 sputtered Si / incident Ga

  20. Ion-Solid Interaction Considerations: Ga into Si SRIM 2003 Simulations 5keV 0° incidence 1.4 sputtered Si / incident Ga 5keV 89° incidence 7.1 sputtered Si / incident Ga

  21. FIB Specimen Preparation and Implant Measurement • Lower FIB energy results in less Ga implantation • Ga implantation is minimal at 2kV • K. Thompson, et. al., Ultramic., 107 (2007) 131

  22. Final Preparation of Tip

  23. FIB / TEM / LEAP Prep • Specimens milled directly down alpha tilt axis of TEM and in line with AP detector

  24. Instrumentation for FIB TEM and LEAP Removable Tip Grid Holder

  25. APT Designs • Straight flight path (LEAP 4000 XSi) • Highest field of view (>200 nm diameter), repetition rate (1 MHz laser pulse), detection efficiency (~57%) • Lower mass resolution • Reflectron – energy compensated (LEAP 4000 XHR) • Highest mass resolution • Slightly lower field of view, repetition rate (250 kHz), detection efficiency (~35%) • Laser pulse vs voltage pulse

  26. Laser Pulsed Local Electrode Atom Probe • Advantages of laser pulsing • Low electrical conductivity materials • Improved interface transitions Voltage pulse Laser pulse Eevap T

More Related