150 likes | 343 Views
Reframing Organizations , 3 rd ed. Chapter 2. Simple Ideas, Complex Organizations. Simple Ideas, Complex Organizations. Properties of Organizations Organizational Learning Coping with Ambiguity and Complexity Common Fallacies in Organizational Diagnosis. Error in Organizations: KAL 007.
E N D
Chapter 2 Simple Ideas, Complex Organizations
Simple Ideas, Complex Organizations • Properties of Organizations • Organizational Learning • Coping with Ambiguity and Complexity • Common Fallacies in Organizational Diagnosis
Error in Organizations: KAL 007 • Destruction of Korean Airlines Flight 007 • Pilot error, plane off course • Enters Soviet air space • Soviet commanders puzzled • Soviet pilot recognizes 747, doesn’t tell anyone • Plane shot down
Error in Organizations: Skilling and Mark at Enron • Mark: big capital investments in foreign energy assets • Skilling: “asset-light”, buy and sell but avoid owning anything • Mark forced out after major losses in Latin America • Skilling stays, but quits a few months before Enron collapses
Error in Organizations: Helen Demarco • Osborne announces revitalization plan • Demarco and colleagues agree it can’t work but we can’t tell him • “Study” to buy time and develop strategy • Option B: low benefits at high costs • Technical jargon as camouflage • Demarco feels frustration, failure
Properties of Organizations • Organizations are complex • Organizations are surprising • Organizations are deceptive • Organizations are ambiguous
Sources of ambiguity • Not sure what the problem is • Not sure what’s going on • Not sure (or can’t agree) on what we want • Don’t have the resources we need • Not sure who’s supposed to do what • Not sure how to get what we want • Not sure how to know if we succeed or fail
Organizational Learning • Peter Senge • We learn best from experience, but often don’t know consequences of our actions • System maps • Barry Oshry • Asymmetric relationships (top – middle – bottom – customer) • “Dance of blind reflex”
Organizational Learning (II) • Argyris and Schon • Actions to promote learning actually inhibit it • Defenses: avoid sensitive issues, tiptoe around taboos
Coping with Ambiguity and Complexity: Friendly Fire in Iraq • What you see what you expect -- and what you want • US fighter pilots expected enemy helicopters • Aerial combat is fighter pilots’ holy grail • Pilots saw what they expected and what they wanted
Coping with ambiguity: conserve or change? • Advantages of relying on existing frames and routines • Protect investment in learning them • They make it easier to understand what’s happening and what to do about it • …but we may misread the situation, take the wrong action, and fail to learn from our errors • Change requires time and energy for learning new approaches but is necessary to developing new skills and capacities
Blame people Bad attitudes, abrasive personalities, neurotic tendencies, stupidity or incompetence Blame the bureaucracy Organization stifled by rules and red tape Thirst for power Organizations are jungles filled with predators and prey Common Fallacies in Organizational Diagnosis
Conclusion • Complexity, surprise, deception and ambiguity make organizations hard to understand and manage • Narrow frames become rigid fallacies, blocking learning and effectiveness • Better ideas and multiple perspectives enhance flexibility and effectiveness