450 likes | 665 Views
2001 Winter Presentation. Site Location. Site View. Site History. 1923. Boston Improved Sewage. 1972. 1968. Site Constraints. Peninsula, surrounded by water Area of in-filled land Winter snow. Engineering Constraints. Soil Properties Compactable Soil 4000 psf bearing capacity
E N D
Site History 1923 Boston Improved Sewage 1972 1968
Site Constraints • Peninsula, surrounded by water • Area of in-filled land • Winter snow
Engineering Constraints • Soil Properties • Compactable Soil • 4000 psf bearing capacity • Capacity, silt/clay and sand mixture • 20’ water table • Loading • Live Load 50 psf • Dead Load 70 psf • Wind Load 35 psf • Roof Load 28 psf
Architect’s Vision “With a clear understanding of the historical influences of site, the land, the harbor, the history of Boston…” air light water sewage A Machine Of Flow movement
Architectural Design 1 (Redesign) • Keep the integrity of the DOME • Allow open center to remain • Evaluate programmatic functionality • Relocate sloped floor rooms to basement level for ease of constructability of slabs
Composite steel design Regular column grid Easy installation Steel moment frame Engineering Design 1 Steel (Redesign) Typical Beam: W14X26 c=1” Moment Frame: W16X36
Total = $3,145,000 Design 1 Steel Estimate (Redesign)
Engineering Design 1 Precast (Redesign) • 12” masonry wall • 24” deep precast concrete girders
Total = $3,231,000 Design 1 Precast Estimate (Redesign)
Finish Dates: Steel - 09/28/16, Precast - 10/05/16 Durations: Steel – 8 mo & 4 wks, Precast – 9 mo Design 1 Schedules Precast Steel
Architectural Design 2 • Concepts • Flow like the waves of the bay • Structure like the hull of a boat • Gesture towards the historic influence of the site • Open walls towards the oak trees • Individuality between faculty and students
Architectural Design 2 Auditorium Classrooms, seminar rooms, labs Student offices Faculty offices, facilities, administration
Engineering Design 2 Steel • Gravity System • Composite steel design • No truss for auditorium Typical Beam W14X30 Typ Girder W24X55 Typ Col W12X40 Auditorium beam w24X76
Engineering Design 2 Steel • Steel bracing • Tube 3X3X1/4 • Foundation layout • Strip & spread footings
Total = $2,722,000 Design 2 Steel Estimate
Engineering Design 2 Precast Concrete gravity system • Load bearing wall, 2-way slab • 48’ post-tensioned girders
Engineering Design 2 Precast • 12” masonry walls • Load path • Foundation layout • 3’ wide strip footing
Total = $2,800,000 Design 2 Precast Estimate
Finish Dates: Steel - 09/14/16, Precast - 09/21/16 Duration: Steel – 8 mo & 2 wks, Precast – 8 mo & 3 wks Design 2 Schedules Precast Steel
Architectural Design 3 • Concepts • Box in a box • Simple, double structure • Advantageous use of sloped classroom and auditorium floors • Flow of light to below grade level • Exterior wood structure to gesture towards trees
Architectural Design 3 Auditorium Classrooms, seminar rooms, labs Student offices Faculty offices, facilities, administration
Engineering Design 3 Steel Inside Frame Plan Gravity System Steel Bracing Tube 3x3x1/4
Engineering Design 3 Steel Outside Frame Plan Flat Roof Steel Knee Brace Frame
Total = $3,083,000 Design 3 Steel Estimate
Engineering Design 3 Wood Inside Frame Plan Wood Wall Lateral System Gravity System
Engineering Design 3 Wood Outside Frame Plan Pre-fabricated wood truss with knee brace Prefab wood truss 2"X6" Column 12"DIA Knee brace 2"X6" Joist 2"X4" Steel Brace 12"X2"
Engineering Design 3 Wood Outside Structure Load Path Gravity Load Lateral Load
Engineering Typical Connection Wood With Steel Plate & Bolts Steel Bracing
Total = $2,978,000 Design 3 Wood Estimate
Finish Dates: Steel - 08/24/16, Wood - 09/07/16 Durations: Steel – 7 mo & 3 wks, Wood – 8 mo & 1 wk Design 3 Schedules Wood Steel
Equipment Selection Truck Crane Mini Excavator Skid Steer Loader
Decision Matrix Explanation of design rankings: 1=Best…6=Worst Lowest point total wins
Design Choice • Design 3 • Best combination of strengths vs. weaknesses were 3W & 3S from matrix • Wood/Steel Hybrid • Combine the attractiveness/interest of 3W with the cost and schedule benefits of 3S • Keep wood exterior structure of 3W, but incorporate the steel interior structure of 3S
Team Dynamics/Interaction “The most challenging and the most successful part of this whole process is the perpetual learning of our own and each others discipline and how we must collaborate in order to succeed.” “The structural system is not the only aspect of the building. We need to think about the others' intentions and constraints. Compromising between different intentions is very important in developing a successful project.” “The greatest thing we will take away from this class is learning how to successfully work in a challenging situation with diverse people on a project with little contact.”
Lessons Learned • Cross-Discipline Knowledge • Vocabulary • Interests/Concerns • Teamwork • Tolerance • Dependence/Collaboration • Organization/Work Habits • Technology • New Applications
2001 Winter Presentation Questions?