1 / 9

Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis

Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis. BCFHPS 2011 October 3, 2011. Context. ‘Challenging’ gap between funding available and funding necessary No appetite for across the board cuts Widespread feeling that ‘we are at the bone’ in terms of potential efficiency gains. First step.

joshwa
Download Presentation

Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis BCFHPS 2011 October 3, 2011

  2. Context ‘Challenging’ gap between funding available and funding necessary No appetite for across the board cuts Widespread feeling that ‘we are at the bone’ in terms of potential efficiency gains

  3. First step Advisory Panel Pooling of expertise Based on existing structures

  4. Second step Criteria At the heart of the process Provide the formal linkage between strategy and decision-making

  5. Third step Process guidelines Sequencing of events Description of roles and responsibilities

  6. Fourth step Proposals development Investment and disinvestment proposals Must be ‘implementable’ Impacts are from a ‘system’ perspective

  7. Fifth step Proposals evaluation Starting point is proposal Validation of information on expected impacts

  8. Sixth step Resource allocation recommendations First task, bridging any budgetary gap Second, marginal analysis

  9. Last step Appeal process and decision making Fairness considerations Feedback between decisions and recommendations

More Related