Download
1 / 8
80 likes | 234 Views
. Rationale. Young people are both impacted by societal problems and a source of such problems, and both traditional and modern systems may offer very little to support young people through these dilemmas, all of which combine to make young people vulnerable, particularly given the effects of global
E N D
2. Brief presentation of the UN Country Team, the RC role, and initiatives in the area of common premises/common services etc. Brief presentation of the UN Country Team, the RC role, and initiatives in the area of common premises/common services etc.
3. It is widely acknowledged that development practices put a heavy burden on partner countries in the form of differing, rules, regulations, and requirements. Instead of strengthening national systems for audit, procurement, etc., development partners thereby effectively undermine existing capacities, by keeping officials occupied with the fulfillment of often complicated and bureaucratic procedures.
The UNDG member agencies have committed to make the use of national systems possible in the areas of
sector reporting
monitoring and evaluation
annual performance reviews
progress reports
procurement
Agencies are currently working on translating these commitments into their respective guidance, rules and regulations (often requiring approval by the Executive Boards).
Furthermore, the UNDG will include a systematic review of national systems in the CCA (or make sure that gaps have been identified through other analytic work in cases where no CCA has been prepared), as basis for the decision on whether to rely on these in subsequent programme cycles or to address eventual capacity gaps systematically through targeted support to national counterparts
Finally, the UNDG has committed to make information on resources available to partner countries, so that they can take these into account for their own planning purposes, and report them (e.g., in an annex to the national budget, which shows ODA or similar). This does not mean the UNDG agencies channel their funds through the national budget, but that they are committed to maximum possible transparency. It is widely acknowledged that development practices put a heavy burden on partner countries in the form of differing, rules, regulations, and requirements. Instead of strengthening national systems for audit, procurement, etc., development partners thereby effectively undermine existing capacities, by keeping officials occupied with the fulfillment of often complicated and bureaucratic procedures.
The UNDG member agencies have committed to make the use of national systems possible in the areas of
sector reporting
monitoring and evaluation
annual performance reviews
progress reports
procurement
Agencies are currently working on translating these commitments into their respective guidance, rules and regulations (often requiring approval by the Executive Boards).
Furthermore, the UNDG will include a systematic review of national systems in the CCA (or make sure that gaps have been identified through other analytic work in cases where no CCA has been prepared), as basis for the decision on whether to rely on these in subsequent programme cycles or to address eventual capacity gaps systematically through targeted support to national counterparts
Finally, the UNDG has committed to make information on resources available to partner countries, so that they can take these into account for their own planning purposes, and report them (e.g., in an annex to the national budget, which shows ODA or similar). This does not mean the UNDG agencies channel their funds through the national budget, but that they are committed to maximum possible transparency.
4. It is widely acknowledged that development practices put a heavy burden on partner countries in the form of differing, rules, regulations, and requirements. Instead of strengthening national systems for audit, procurement, etc., development partners thereby effectively undermine existing capacities, by keeping officials occupied with the fulfillment of often complicated and bureaucratic procedures.
The UNDG member agencies have committed to make the use of national systems possible in the areas of
sector reporting
monitoring and evaluation
annual performance reviews
progress reports
procurement
Agencies are currently working on translating these commitments into their respective guidance, rules and regulations (often requiring approval by the Executive Boards).
Furthermore, the UNDG will include a systematic review of national systems in the CCA (or make sure that gaps have been identified through other analytic work in cases where no CCA has been prepared), as basis for the decision on whether to rely on these in subsequent programme cycles or to address eventual capacity gaps systematically through targeted support to national counterparts
Finally, the UNDG has committed to make information on resources available to partner countries, so that they can take these into account for their own planning purposes, and report them (e.g., in an annex to the national budget, which shows ODA or similar). This does not mean the UNDG agencies channel their funds through the national budget, but that they are committed to maximum possible transparency. It is widely acknowledged that development practices put a heavy burden on partner countries in the form of differing, rules, regulations, and requirements. Instead of strengthening national systems for audit, procurement, etc., development partners thereby effectively undermine existing capacities, by keeping officials occupied with the fulfillment of often complicated and bureaucratic procedures.
The UNDG member agencies have committed to make the use of national systems possible in the areas of
sector reporting
monitoring and evaluation
annual performance reviews
progress reports
procurement
Agencies are currently working on translating these commitments into their respective guidance, rules and regulations (often requiring approval by the Executive Boards).
Furthermore, the UNDG will include a systematic review of national systems in the CCA (or make sure that gaps have been identified through other analytic work in cases where no CCA has been prepared), as basis for the decision on whether to rely on these in subsequent programme cycles or to address eventual capacity gaps systematically through targeted support to national counterparts
Finally, the UNDG has committed to make information on resources available to partner countries, so that they can take these into account for their own planning purposes, and report them (e.g., in an annex to the national budget, which shows ODA or similar). This does not mean the UNDG agencies channel their funds through the national budget, but that they are committed to maximum possible transparency.
5. It is widely acknowledged that development practices put a heavy burden on partner countries in the form of differing, rules, regulations, and requirements. Instead of strengthening national systems for audit, procurement, etc., development partners thereby effectively undermine existing capacities, by keeping officials occupied with the fulfillment of often complicated and bureaucratic procedures.
The UNDG member agencies have committed to make the use of national systems possible in the areas of
sector reporting
monitoring and evaluation
annual performance reviews
progress reports
procurement
Agencies are currently working on translating these commitments into their respective guidance, rules and regulations (often requiring approval by the Executive Boards).
Furthermore, the UNDG will include a systematic review of national systems in the CCA (or make sure that gaps have been identified through other analytic work in cases where no CCA has been prepared), as basis for the decision on whether to rely on these in subsequent programme cycles or to address eventual capacity gaps systematically through targeted support to national counterparts
Finally, the UNDG has committed to make information on resources available to partner countries, so that they can take these into account for their own planning purposes, and report them (e.g., in an annex to the national budget, which shows ODA or similar). This does not mean the UNDG agencies channel their funds through the national budget, but that they are committed to maximum possible transparency. It is widely acknowledged that development practices put a heavy burden on partner countries in the form of differing, rules, regulations, and requirements. Instead of strengthening national systems for audit, procurement, etc., development partners thereby effectively undermine existing capacities, by keeping officials occupied with the fulfillment of often complicated and bureaucratic procedures.
The UNDG member agencies have committed to make the use of national systems possible in the areas of
sector reporting
monitoring and evaluation
annual performance reviews
progress reports
procurement
Agencies are currently working on translating these commitments into their respective guidance, rules and regulations (often requiring approval by the Executive Boards).
Furthermore, the UNDG will include a systematic review of national systems in the CCA (or make sure that gaps have been identified through other analytic work in cases where no CCA has been prepared), as basis for the decision on whether to rely on these in subsequent programme cycles or to address eventual capacity gaps systematically through targeted support to national counterparts
Finally, the UNDG has committed to make information on resources available to partner countries, so that they can take these into account for their own planning purposes, and report them (e.g., in an annex to the national budget, which shows ODA or similar). This does not mean the UNDG agencies channel their funds through the national budget, but that they are committed to maximum possible transparency.
6. It is widely acknowledged that development practices put a heavy burden on partner countries in the form of differing, rules, regulations, and requirements. Instead of strengthening national systems for audit, procurement, etc., development partners thereby effectively undermine existing capacities, by keeping officials occupied with the fulfillment of often complicated and bureaucratic procedures.
The UNDG member agencies have committed to make the use of national systems possible in the areas of
sector reporting
monitoring and evaluation
annual performance reviews
progress reports
procurement
Agencies are currently working on translating these commitments into their respective guidance, rules and regulations (often requiring approval by the Executive Boards).
Furthermore, the UNDG will include a systematic review of national systems in the CCA (or make sure that gaps have been identified through other analytic work in cases where no CCA has been prepared), as basis for the decision on whether to rely on these in subsequent programme cycles or to address eventual capacity gaps systematically through targeted support to national counterparts
Finally, the UNDG has committed to make information on resources available to partner countries, so that they can take these into account for their own planning purposes, and report them (e.g., in an annex to the national budget, which shows ODA or similar). This does not mean the UNDG agencies channel their funds through the national budget, but that they are committed to maximum possible transparency. It is widely acknowledged that development practices put a heavy burden on partner countries in the form of differing, rules, regulations, and requirements. Instead of strengthening national systems for audit, procurement, etc., development partners thereby effectively undermine existing capacities, by keeping officials occupied with the fulfillment of often complicated and bureaucratic procedures.
The UNDG member agencies have committed to make the use of national systems possible in the areas of
sector reporting
monitoring and evaluation
annual performance reviews
progress reports
procurement
Agencies are currently working on translating these commitments into their respective guidance, rules and regulations (often requiring approval by the Executive Boards).
Furthermore, the UNDG will include a systematic review of national systems in the CCA (or make sure that gaps have been identified through other analytic work in cases where no CCA has been prepared), as basis for the decision on whether to rely on these in subsequent programme cycles or to address eventual capacity gaps systematically through targeted support to national counterparts
Finally, the UNDG has committed to make information on resources available to partner countries, so that they can take these into account for their own planning purposes, and report them (e.g., in an annex to the national budget, which shows ODA or similar). This does not mean the UNDG agencies channel their funds through the national budget, but that they are committed to maximum possible transparency.
7. It is widely acknowledged that development practices put a heavy burden on partner countries in the form of differing, rules, regulations, and requirements. Instead of strengthening national systems for audit, procurement, etc., development partners thereby effectively undermine existing capacities, by keeping officials occupied with the fulfillment of often complicated and bureaucratic procedures.
The UNDG member agencies have committed to make the use of national systems possible in the areas of
sector reporting
monitoring and evaluation
annual performance reviews
progress reports
procurement
Agencies are currently working on translating these commitments into their respective guidance, rules and regulations (often requiring approval by the Executive Boards).
Furthermore, the UNDG will include a systematic review of national systems in the CCA (or make sure that gaps have been identified through other analytic work in cases where no CCA has been prepared), as basis for the decision on whether to rely on these in subsequent programme cycles or to address eventual capacity gaps systematically through targeted support to national counterparts
Finally, the UNDG has committed to make information on resources available to partner countries, so that they can take these into account for their own planning purposes, and report them (e.g., in an annex to the national budget, which shows ODA or similar). This does not mean the UNDG agencies channel their funds through the national budget, but that they are committed to maximum possible transparency. It is widely acknowledged that development practices put a heavy burden on partner countries in the form of differing, rules, regulations, and requirements. Instead of strengthening national systems for audit, procurement, etc., development partners thereby effectively undermine existing capacities, by keeping officials occupied with the fulfillment of often complicated and bureaucratic procedures.
The UNDG member agencies have committed to make the use of national systems possible in the areas of
sector reporting
monitoring and evaluation
annual performance reviews
progress reports
procurement
Agencies are currently working on translating these commitments into their respective guidance, rules and regulations (often requiring approval by the Executive Boards).
Furthermore, the UNDG will include a systematic review of national systems in the CCA (or make sure that gaps have been identified through other analytic work in cases where no CCA has been prepared), as basis for the decision on whether to rely on these in subsequent programme cycles or to address eventual capacity gaps systematically through targeted support to national counterparts
Finally, the UNDG has committed to make information on resources available to partner countries, so that they can take these into account for their own planning purposes, and report them (e.g., in an annex to the national budget, which shows ODA or similar). This does not mean the UNDG agencies channel their funds through the national budget, but that they are committed to maximum possible transparency.
8.
KEY MESSAGE
These four thematic areas represent the broad areas that all 13 UN agencies work in. It will be the framework for planning and resource allocation and mobilisation from 2008-2012.
The four priority areas are aligned with the Pacific Plan and other regional plans/policies.
Four priority areas
Growth; sustained resource base for MDG achievement
Governance; invest in MDG based strategies, policies and plans
Services; protect the rights of the most vulnerable
Environment; manage and safeguard the foundation
Cross Cutting Themes
Gender Equality – aiming at specific impacts
Rights based approaches;
Partnership for development
Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness
Pacific Technical architecture
KEY MESSAGE
These four thematic areas represent the broad areas that all 13 UN agencies work in. It will be the framework for planning and resource allocation and mobilisation from 2008-2012.
The four priority areas are aligned with the Pacific Plan and other regional plans/policies.
Four priority areas
Growth; sustained resource base for MDG achievement
Governance; invest in MDG based strategies, policies and plans
Services; protect the rights of the most vulnerable
Environment; manage and safeguard the foundation
Cross Cutting Themes
Gender Equality – aiming at specific impacts
Rights based approaches;
Partnership for development
Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness
Pacific Technical architecture
