1 / 17

Belgrade review process – Novelties

Belgrade review process – Novelties. Development and use of the Belgrade review tool (widening the scope of the consultation NGOs, academia, research) A first attempt in implementing the Aarhus convention requirements See: http://ewindows.eu.org/belgrade07. Languages.

jsmiley
Download Presentation

Belgrade review process – Novelties

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Belgrade review process – Novelties • Development and use of the Belgrade review tool (widening the scope of the consultation NGOs, academia, research) • A first attempt in implementing the Aarhus convention requirements • See: http://ewindows.eu.org/belgrade07

  2. Languages Click on the chapter title to leave comments Login with your CIRCA username and password

  3. Entering a chapter On-line commenting Off-line commenting

  4. Some advantages of online commenting • Automatic translation of comments and answers (Russian <-> English); • Comments listed chronologically with Username and date; • Comments immediately visible to all; • Statistics generated on: countries, organisations, languages, number of comments, relevance as per Author evaluation.

  5. Belgrade review process – Events Two dedicated consultation meetings funded under EU TACIS activity: • EECCA NGOs &others 16-17 Nov; • Special session UNECE/WGEMA 27-29 Nov; See : http://ewindows.eu.org/belgrade07/eecca/tacis/tacis_06/fol179451/fol351404

  6. General comments Key messages – general acceptance & suggestions for new ones (Biodiversity, waste and SCP) Issues of high relevance: CC, Energy, Transport , Air, Water, Chemicals, Waste and SCP Issues of low relevance: marine, agriculture, biodiversity Data and information issues: - further data checking Transport & Air; - additional information to be provided by participants (mainly project-based results) - case studies/good practices: many identified (to be provided )

  7. Comments /topics Highlighted issues/cross cutting linkages: • CC vs. poverty; vs. desertification; Green investment schemes: innovative • Energy vs. poverty; vs. modernization • Energy: focus on effectiveness of production and use • Energy: focus renewable (including future prospects) • Energy: nuclear a questionable issue – attention!

  8. Comments /topics Highlighted issues/cross cutting linkages: • Transport vs. poverty and remittances (gap between regulation and implementation); • Transport by pipelines and possible impact of future trends; • Air quality (also indoor) and health/poverty

  9. Comments /topics • Health – Chernobyl case – sensitive in the use of information source (WHO criticised) • Linkages: • Outdoor & indoor air quality and health impact • Transport, leaded fuel & health impact (better reflected) • Institutional aspects, lack of cooperation and coordination between gov.bodies on env.health education (OECD connection)

  10. Comments /topics • Health impact - cross cutting aspects across various reports due for 2007 (OECD, UNEP/EEA, WHO) • ESD – showing similar evolution as the env. development (need for working together and sharing responsibility) • ESD: 3 main instruments: education, awareness raising (targeted to emerging issues and various social groups) and training/re-training • ESD – pillar to Aarhus implementation • ESD section- to be produced as a joint effort

  11. Comments /topics Chemicals (additional information needed) • More focus on POPs than heavy metals • Reflect better the situation due to military industry/ space centers/uranium deposits sites • Reflect sub-regional situation of chemical industry in EECCA Soil • better info needed on radioactive pollution; • better linkage with other chapters/sections

  12. Comments /topics Biodiversity • More focus on protected areas: targets, efficiency of protection measures using indicators; relationship with agriculture; funding available • Focus on threatened endemic species rather than invasive species

  13. Comments /topics Water(additional data and info needed) • More focus on drinking water (especially in rural areas), floods, mountain ecosystems; • A key message should address investments needs in rural areas; • Consider the national order of priority : (a) water supply, (b) water treatment, (c) sludge management; Agriculture - consequence of migration from rural to urban and need for land reforms;

  14. Comments /topics Waste, use of natural resources, SCP • Very relevant topic; better nuance the key messages and strengthen conclusions; • On waste - challenges on both policy options as well as awareness & technology & management; • More on trade & environmental impacts ; • Future of the NAPs on SCP???

  15. From consultation…to dissemination From June 2007 the Belgrade review tool will be use for dissemination of the report • In English • In Russian

  16. Belgrade 07 Belgrade 07 From June 2007

More Related