1 / 12

Admissions Process Review

Admissions Process Review. Dr Tammy Long Head of the Admissions Process Review (seconded) Stakeholder Reference Group. Purpose.

brede
Download Presentation

Admissions Process Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Admissions Process Review Dr Tammy Long Head of the Admissions Process Review (seconded) Stakeholder Reference Group

  2. Purpose • The Admissions Process Review will map future models of admissions that could deliver improved efficiencies for members, increased certainty for applicants, better services and outcomes for applicants and an improved student experience • The review will consider synergies with student finance applications and the possibility of extending UCAS members outside of the UK

  3. Principles of the Review (I) In line with UCAS’ strategic objectives, the principles are to deliver an admissions model that: • Removes unnecessary transactions and delivers member efficiencies • Is able to cope with a greater diversity of applicants • Delivers fair admissions and access • Delivers an efficient and effective process for applicants as well as a positive experience for applicants engaging with the process

  4. Principles of the Review (II) • Considers synergies with student finance and other external agencies • Can cope with different modes of delivery e.g. part-time, different intensities of study, different start dates • There is a net benefit to members, stakeholders and UCAS

  5. Scope • Members from all UK countries • Full-time & part-time undergraduates • Full-time & part-time postgraduates taught • Home, EU and international applicants • CUKAS, GTTR • Employer engagement • Private institutions (profit and not-for- profit) • FE institutions delivering HE • Home and EU providers • Student finance • IAg process • Rules of engagement: timing

  6. Approach • Steering Group set up by UCAS Board • Project team set up in UCAS – with secondees • Wider stakeholder group will be involved in and have input into research and consultation • Members and stakeholders will be consulted during the project • Any proposals will be tested, developed and refined with members, stakeholders and applicants • Review recommendations will be for consultation and agreement by the HE sector

  7. Approach • Phase 1 : Agree the principles of the review • Phase 2 : Set the context • Phase 3 : Member voice • Phase 4 : Applicant voice • Phase 5 : Development of new options

  8. Member engagement activities (I)

  9. Member engagement activities (II)

  10. Applicant engagement activities

  11. Stakeholder engagement activities

  12. Questions?How to contact us:admissionsprocessreview@ucas.ac.uk

More Related