230 likes | 248 Views
Explore the theories of Heinz Werner and Lev Vygotsky on memory in children, comparing their views on perception, memory acquisition, and the impact of cultural and biological factors.
E N D
Memory and the Child Werner vs. Vygotsky
Heinz Werner (1890-1964) • Born in Vienna, Austria in 1890 • Bright and studious • Loved music and planned to be composer and music historian • Class incident – changed major to psychology and philosophy • Gestalt philosophy • Came to America in 1933 • 1947 – Professor at Clark University Biographical information from: Crain, William. Theories of Development: Concepts and Applications. Fifth Ed. New Jersey: Pearson: Prentice Hall, 2005.
Werner’s Key Terms • Eidetic imagery • The “pure memory image” of something, as if the image in one’s mind is actually the percept itself. • Physiognomic perception • The perception of an object from an emotional viewpoint, as the child is affected by what he sees. It is the attribution of expressive features to any object, even inanimate. • Synesthesia • The combination of more than one sense in perceiving an object. This makes a rich, vivacious perception. • Geometric-technical perception • The tendency to use objective and measurable properties in perception. This is a completely abstract, objective approach to perception. • Microgenetic mobility • The ability of some adults to revert from geometric-technical to physiognomic perception.
Heinz Werner – His Theory • Discontiuous Development • Orthogenic Principle • Organic whole • Differentiation • Hierarchical integration • Self-object differentiation • Physiognomic Perception – younger children • Geometric-technical perception – older children/adults Werner Nature Nurture
Lev Vygotsky (1896-1934) • 1896 - Born and raised in Byelorussia Republic • Exceptionally bright child • 1917 - Graduated from Moscow University • 1917-1924 - Teaching • 1924 - Stunning psychology presentation • 1924-1934 Research and development of theory • Works not published until much later Biographical information from: Dixon-Krauss, Lisbeth. Vygotsky in the Classroom: Mediated Literacy Instruction and Assessment. New York: Longman Publishers USA, 1996. pp.2-3
Vygotsky’s Key Terms • Natural mental behaviors • the elementary, biological abilities of the brain. This and other “lower…mental behaviors,” according to Vygotsky, are shared with some animals. • Cultural mental behaviors • the culturally developed, higher mental actions that are unique to humans. These behaviors are more complex and are self-directed . • Signs - psychological tools – • “artificial, or self-generated, stimuli.”. Objects, behaviors, or other stimuli which people use to augment their natural mental capacities. They give people control over their mental behaviors. Examples: language, reminders. When signs are used, behavior is said to be “mediated behavior.” • Internalization • The progressive transfer from external social activity mediated by signs to internal control. • Semioticmediation • The process by which, through the use of signs, natural mental behaviors are developed into higher, cultural, mental behaviors Definitions from Vygotsky, Mind in Society, Dixon-Krauss, Vygotsky in the Classroom: Mediated Literacy Instruction and Assessment, Bodrova, Tools of the Mind: The Vygotskian Approach to Early Childhood Education., and Crain textbook.
Vygotsky Nature Nurture Lev Vygotsky – His Theory • Sociohistorical theory of development • There are two lines of development: “the elementary processes, which are of biological origin…and the higher psychological functions, of sociocultural origin…The history of child behavior is born from the interweaving of these two lines.”- Mind in Society • A. Leontiev’s study on mediated memory • Younger children – little or no use of signs • School-age children – use of external signs • Adults – internalized use of signs
Werner “As one would expect, the capacity for retention during childhood has been found to increase with age… We know at least one of the principal causal factors: viz., the growing capacity of the child to organize material to be retained.” Vygotsky “In the elementary form something is remembered; in the higher form humans remember something.” Werner and Vygotsky’s views on memory
Guiding Questions • Is it really true that older children, whom Vygotsky would say have culturally acquired better memory skills, but who no longer have the richness of perception and eidetic imagery that Werner says younger children possess, will remember more than the younger children? • Will a structured, logical approach to memory hinder the natural ability of the younger children while assisting the older?
Hypothesis • The kindergartners will do better overall • The kindergartners’ scores will not improve when they are asked to remember. • The third graders’ scores will improve when they are asked to remember
Procedure • 5 Kindergartners and 5 Third Graders • 2 Scenes • Farm Scene • Discussion of objects and details • Not told beforehand to try to remember • Asked how they remembered • Beach Scene • Discussion of objects and details • Told beforehand to try to remember • Asked how they remembered
The Scenes # 2: Beach Scene # 1: Farm Scene
Scoring • Object remembered correctly: +1 point • Detail remembered correctly: +1 point • Incorrect object or detail: -1 point
Conclusions I. K over 3rd overall: • WRONG! II. K wouldn’t improve: • RIGHT! III. 3rd would improve: • WRONG!
Limitations • Distractions • Kindergartners and third graders too close in age • Should have encouraged the children to give more details on their own, when discussing the picture the first time
Other Questions • How much of a difference does it make when things to be remembered are discussed, and not just seen? What about the other senses? • Which played a more significant role in memory: Werner’s development, or Vygotsky’s social conditioning? Or a mixture of both?
Links: • Werner overview: http://danielson.laurentian.caldrdnotes/5106ch05.htm • Vygotsky overview: http://www.geocities.com/lorigranth/>