310 likes | 345 Views
Farsheed Farjady Dr Marco Ruffini, Professor David Payne, Professor Nick Doran. Techno-Economic Comparison of GPONs and Long-reach PONs. Overview. 1.0 Intro to LR-PON and GPON 2.0 Advantages of LR-PON 3.0 Results 4.0 Summary. GPON Architecture with 21CN backhaul. 32-64 Customers.
E N D
Farsheed Farjady Dr Marco Ruffini, Professor David Payne, Professor Nick Doran Techno-Economic Comparison of GPONs and Long-reach PONs
Overview 1.0 Intro to LR-PON and GPON 2.0 Advantages of LR-PON 3.0 Results 4.0 Summary
GPON Architecture with 21CN backhaul 32-64 Customers 2.5 Gbit/s downstream (1495 nm) Local Exchange ONU Backhaul to metro nodes GPON OLT ONU 1.25 Gbit/s upstream (1310 nm) ONU 20 km max
LONG-REACH PONs (LR-PONs) 10.0 Gbit/s downstream 512 to1024 total split 10.0 Gbit/s upstream Flat Core Network Metro Node LOCAL EXCHANGE (by passed) 100 km OPTICAL AMPLIFIERS
Advantages of LR-PON • Large split 512 to 1024 instead of 32 to 64 • Greater statistical multiplexing advantage. • Reduction in Electronic nodes and sub-systems • Lower cost, lower power consumption - greener network • Optical networks more reliable than copper. • Lower operating costs • 10Gb/s peak rate to customers (~10,000 times DSL rates). • 10 to 20 Mb/s sustained bandwidth (~200 times DSL rates). • Future bandwidth can be ~ 100 times greater via WDM • 5600 Local Exchanges in UK can be reduced to ~100!
Techno-Economic Software Model Fibre cost data to create cash flows curves from Analysys Mason for BSG, 2008: “The costs of deploying fibre-based next-generation broadband Infrastructure”.
100 Mb/s maximum bandwidth Effect of variable take-up rate and
High and Low Exchange Population Exchange Population= 24645 e.g. Swansea Main, Wales Exchange Population= 5164 e.g. Glantawe, Wales
Summary I • The model is a flexible analysis tool for comparing alternative architectures Current version includes: • LR-PON plus flat optical core • Standard GPON with 21cn type backhaul • The model predicts lower cost for LRPON as well as faster time to positive cash flow. • These advantages will be greater when power consumption models are added later in the project.
Summary II • The model can produce: • Cash flow analysis • Component and sub-system costs. • Inventory analysis • Cost by region/geography, geotype or exchange area etc. • It is developed as a strategic analysis tool but could be developed for business case support in the future, if required.
Acknowledgment We wish to thank Welsh Assembly Government for funding this project.