110 likes | 135 Views
Overview. Collaboration Rich Interfacing Technically feasible Vision Agreed upon Funding?. Users. Groups. WBS. Articles. Org. Articles/PBS. WBS. CATIA. CDS. Indico. PPT. PLM. Documents. Meetings/ Conferences. Project Planning Data. Engineering Documents. Other CAD….
E N D
Overview • Collaboration • Rich • Interfacing • Technically feasible • Vision • Agreed upon • Funding?
Users Groups WBS Articles Org Articles/PBS WBS CATIA CDS Indico PPT PLM Documents Meetings/ Conferences Project Planning Data Engineering Documents Other CAD… CAD (Original format) CAD (JT Neutral format) CAE… Shared Data Layer E R P MTF D7i Asset Tracking
Users Groups WBS Articles WBS Articles/PBS Org CATIA CDS Indico PPT PLM Documents Meetings/ Conferences Project Planning Data Engineering Documents Other CAD… CAD (Original format) D7i Asset Tracking CAD (Neutral format) CAE… Shared Data Layer E R P Equipment
General Scenarios emerging Scenario 1. Integrate existing tools as-is Scenario 2. SmarTeam + EDMS + integration Scenario 3 TeamCenter + EDMS + integration
Current Coherency: Can I guarantee the design of dependent components won’t evolve? Idea Plan Design Build Install Operate Maintenance : Can I trace defects to the original design? Casual 3D “gaseous phase” Assembly : Can I guarantee all the parts of an assembly will fit together? 2D 2D workflow Traceability : Can I trace the prototype to the design?
Future Defects traced to earliest possible stage Idea Plan Design Build Install Operate Casual 3D “gaseous phase” 3D visualisation of assembly in workflow provides for rapid & early error detection 2D All Items/ Assembly declared even in prototype phase 3D model workflow Assembly Impact analysis 2D plans Invalidates assemblies if dependent components altered
Assembly 2 Assembly 1 Flange
CATIA & SmartTeam Read-any format, but produce one format only ITER, IN2P2, Orsay Same vendor Smaller Budget Weaker 3D viewer Weaker dependency tracking Works if CERN is integrator CATIA & TeamCenter Read-any & support any (via JT) DESY, Fermi, INFN… Multicad viewer Strong dependency tracking Neighbourhood tracking Covers agile functionality Works if CERN integrator or collaborator Big Budget EDMS Scenarios
EDMS / CDS EDMS CDS Talks & Seminars Work in Progress Design Documents Committee Documents Drawings Preprints Books Overlap Proceedings Engineering Data Change Requests Publications Photos Measurements Reports Highly visible to top Management as they tend to be Management Meeting documents…
Costs • Operating • PPT, CDS, EDMS : 0.2 -> 0.5 FTE each for a given project • Integration • 2 FTE for 1 year • Setup • Negligible if same server & config as existing • PDM • DESY “1-2m Euro”, Stark “1m$ -> company 1000 people” • 3 FTE : product, system, webservices • 2 FTE : Training, Support & QA • Licenses : Server + end-user + consulting • Time (DESY , Fermi ~ 2 years) • Consulting (DESY – 2.5 UGS x 6 months for startup)
ILC observations • Design already quite advanced • Major players DESY & Fermi using IDEAS • DESY ILC Teamcenter operational • CERN • 1 year before operational • (DESY 1 yr + half year * 2.5 UGS consulting, Fermi 2 years still not oper and they have x-UGS recruits!)