90 likes | 105 Views
Progress in Environmental Policy Reform in EECCA Introductory Remarks Multi-stakeholder meeting Brussels 13-14 March 2007. Brendan Gillespie Head, EAP TF Secretariat OECD. Progress Mixed. 200 positive examples; 12 countries; 15 policy areas
E N D
Progress in Environmental Policy Reform in EECCAIntroductory RemarksMulti-stakeholder meetingBrussels13-14 March 2007 Brendan Gillespie Head, EAP TF Secretariat OECD
Progress Mixed • 200 positive examples; 12 countries; 15 policy areas • No acceleration of progress since Kiev; some regression • Long time required for convergence with CEE • Challenge is to scale-up, broaden and deepen environmental reform, and establish a stronger set of incentives for environmental improvement
Weak Drivers • Weak market incentives for efficiency; affordabilityan important concern • Weak public and political demand for stricter environmental requirements • Weak international drivers: • Trade and investment • Lower donor support compared to CEE and SEE
Economic Context • Per capita income: • 4 countries>USD3,000 (RF, Kaz, Tur, Bel) • 4 more>USD1,000 • 4 countries<USD1,000 • 7 countries qualify for IDA • 40% of population in poverty, particularly in rural areas; 70% in Tajikistan • 7% average growth 2003-06, but have not recovered 1989 income levels yet; GDP less than half 1989 levels in Georgia and Moldova
Growing Diversity • Income • Access to resources • Size • Environmental challenges • Politics • Yet: all EECCA countries inherited the Soviet administrative tradition • So: what is the scope for treating environmental policy reform at national, sub-regional and EECCA-wide levels?
Environmental ministries and agencies • General challenge of public sector reform • Systemic challenges in environmental institutions • Leadership and strategic objectives • “permanent revolution” • Process not results-orientation • Weak link of information to policy • Shortages of strategic skills • Environmental policy tools • EIA/SEA • Permitting • Standards • Market-based instruments and finance • Compliance assurance
Integrating environment into sectoral policies • Poor understanding of economic benefits of environmental policies, or costs of inaction • Weakens the ability to make an economic case for the environment • And to develop “win-win” strategies • Failure to address the political economy of environmental reform: issues of winners and losers • Opportunities for using SEA?
Working with stakeholders • Need to transform relations with industry and provide incentives for better environmental performance • Modern, realistic policy instruments • Shift from revenue-raising to incentives • Carrots as well as sticks • Representative business associations needed for dialogue with government • Government cooperation with NGOs • Should move beyond culture of resistance • Remove obstacles to NGO activity • NGOs need to establish a stronger financial and political base
Working with donors • Bilateral assistance lower than in 2001; EC increasingly most important donor • IFI loans have increased since 2003 • 50% of bilateral and 75% of multilateral assistance went to RF and KAZ • Questions about aid effectiveness linked with shift to budget support • Underlines the importance of: • Integrating environment into national strategies • Identifying areas of mutual interest • Better donor coordination