330 likes | 492 Views
Judicial Decision Making. PSCI 2481. Determinants of Judicial Decision Making I. Law (Substantive) Law (Procedural) Facts Personality Attitudes Policy Goals. A Forgery Case: What Punishment Should Be Assigned?. The Convicted Defendant: 28 Year old Mexican American $145 bad check
E N D
Judicial Decision Making PSCI 2481
Determinants of Judicial Decision Making I • Law (Substantive) • Law (Procedural) • Facts • Personality • Attitudes • Policy Goals
A Forgery Case:What Punishment Should Be Assigned? • The Convicted Defendant: • 28 Year old Mexican American • $145 bad check • Working class Family • Father died at age 6 • Prior record (Auto theft as juvenile, DWI, Burglary) • 9th Grade Education • Spotty work record • Married with baby, drinking problem, large bills
The Judges Respond Time served plus probation 3% Jail with no Probation 7% Jail and Probation 65% Prison 25%
Determinants of Judicial Decision Making II • Social Background • Family • Education • Experience • Religion • Age • Gender • Race • Income
Walker v. Birmingham The Setting: 1963 Birmingham, Alabama Still a segregated community (Schools/Motels/Restaurants, etc.) The Key Players: Southern Christian Leadership Conference Rev. Martin Luther King Rev. Wyatt Walker, Rev. Ralph Abernathy Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth Birmingham City Public Safety Commissioner “Bull” Conner
Walker v. Birmingham • April 3rd - Lola Hendricks & Ambrose Hill apply for a parade permit. • April 5th - Rev. Shuttlesworth requests a permit on behalf of the ACMHR • The parade requests are denied. • April 7th - Palm Sunday demonstrations occur. (as do others throughout the week – as the photos show).
Walker v. Birmingham • April 10, 1963 – Injunction Hearing (Judge William Jenkins) • TRO is issued ex parte at the request of the city of Birmingham ordering that parades may not be held on Good Friday (4/12) and Easter Sunday (4/14). • Parades/Marches happen: • Good Friday – led by Rev. Martin Luther King and Rev. Ralph Abernathy • Easter Sunday – led by Rev. Wyatt Walker and Rev. Daniel King • Arrests all around!
(Why is this an important incident?) • Martin Luther King pens his famous “Letter from the Birmingham Jail” during the following week. He is responding to his critics who wonder if he, the SCLC and the ACMHR have adopted the right strategy for winning civil rights for blacks in the South. (If you’ve never read this letter, you should do so.)
Walker v. Birmingham The Trial - April 22, 1963 (Judge William Jenkins!!!) Legal Issues Raised by Defendants: • Injunction (issued ex parte) was invalid. • Case should be in Federal Court on 1st Amendment grounds. • Demonstrations were “walks’ not “parades”. • Conduct was protected by 1st & 14th Amendments. • City parade ordinance was administered in an arbitrary and capacious manner.
Walker v. Birmingham The Trial Court Decision (Announced April 26, 1963) • The demonstrators lost. Ordinance was not “invalid on its face”, was not administered “a&c”, and the temporary injunction was a valid exercise of the court’s authority. • Penalty: $50 & 5 days in jail
Walker v. Birmingham State Supreme Court • Cert granted May 15, 1963 • Appeal filed August 22, 1963 • Decision announced December 9, 1965 (279 Ala. 53; 181 So. 2d 493) (Justice Coleman was known to have “pen paralysis” aka “writer’s block”, esp. when it came to civil rights issues.) • The conviction of the civil rights demonstrators was affirmed.
Walker v. Birmingham US Supreme Court • Cert granted, October 10, 1966 • Oral Arguments, March 13, 1967 • Decision Announced, June 12, 1967 388 US 307 (1967)
Walker v. Birmingham The civil rights demonstrators lost again! (5-4) MajorityMinority Black Warren Stewart Douglas Clark Brennan Harlan Fortas White
Why? (There is a point to this story)
Judicial Backgrounds Chief JusticeEarl Warren (Appointed 1953/DDE) • University of California, Berkeley (Boalt Hall) • Republican (w/ a Democratic ideology?) • California Attorney General (1938-1942) • Freed father’s murderer • California Governor (1942-1953), VP Nominee (1948) • Supported internment of Japanese during WWII • IN THE MINORITY in Walker v. Birmingham
Judicial Backgrounds Justice Hugo L. Black (Appointed 1937/FDR) • Democrat/Southerner (Alabama) • University of Alabama Law School • Judge of the Birmingham Police Court • Senator from Alabama • KKK Member/American Legion • Opposed federal anti-lynching laws • IN THE MAJORITY in Walker v. Birmingham
Judicial Backgrounds Justice William O. Douglas (Appointed 1939/FDR) • Wall Street Lawyer • Columbia Law School • Yale Professor • New Deal Supporter (SEC) • “Law should be an instrument of social change” (a liberal) • IN THE MINORITY in Walker v. Birmingham
Congratulations!!! CU Women’s Soccer gains berth in Big 12 tournament with 1-0 win over Okie State
Judicial Backgrounds Justice Tom C. Clark (Appointed 1949/HHT) • Democrat/WASP • University of Texas Law School • US Attorney General • Enlarged Civil Rights Division but supported Japanese-American relocation during WWII. Criticized by NAACP. • (Anyone remember what Truman said about him?) • IN THE MAJORITY in Walker v. Birmingham
Judicial Backgrounds Justice John M. Harlan II (appointed 1952) • Republican/WASP • Economic Conservative • New York University • Midwesterner • Grandson of Justice John Harlan • IN THE MAJORITY in Walker v. Birmingham
Judicial Backgrounds Justice William J. Brennan, jr. (appointed 1956/DDE) • Democrat/Catholic • Harvard Law School • Labor Law expert (on management side!) • NJ Supreme Court (appted by Republican Governor) • One of Eisenhower’s 2 “mistakes” • IN THE MINORITY in Walker v. Birmingham
Judicial Backgrounds Justice Potter Stewart (appointed 1959/DDE) • Midwesterner • Yale Law School • Neither liberal nor conservative • Satisfactory to Democrats in Eisenhower “lame duck” period • Belief in “narrow” opinions • IN THE MAJORITY in Walker v. Birmingham
Judicial Backgrounds Justice Byron “Whizzer” White (appointed 1962/JFK) • Former CU and professional football player • Yale Law School • Deputy US Attorney General • Prosecuted “Freedom Rider” case in Alabama (to protect civil rights demonstrators he used ex parte injunctions to stop state actions). • IN THE MAJORITY in Walker v. Birmingham
Judicial Backgrounds Justice Abe Fortas (appointed 1964/LBJ) • Democrat/Jewish • Yale Law School • Former student of William O. Douglas • Wall St. Attorney • Close advisor to LBJ • IN THE MINORITY in Walker v. Birmingham
Walker v. Birmingham To Repeat: MajorityMinority Black Warren (D) Stewart (CO) Douglas (D) Clark Brennan (D) Harlan Fortas White
Determinants of Judicial Decision Making III • Interpersonal Factors • Persuasion • Friendship • Leadership
Determinants of Judicial Decision Making IV • Institutional Defense e.g., The Watergate Tapes Case • Pressure from Other Actors e.g., President & Congress
Determinants of Judicial Decision Making V • Public Opinion • Reactions to Public Preferences • Public Preferences influence the Checks & Balances among the 3 branches of government: “A Stitch in Time that Saved Nine”