150 likes | 445 Views
Grouting Considerations for Natural Cementation in Sands. Presented by Brian Martinez. Considerations. The Ideal Chemical Grout and Microbial-Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) Strength of Grout pH Considerations Gel Time Grouting Technology Complications Solutions Concluding Remarks.
E N D
Grouting Considerations for Natural Cementation in Sands Presented by Brian Martinez
Considerations • The Ideal Chemical Grout and Microbial-Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) • Strength of Grout • pH Considerations • Gel Time • Grouting Technology • Complications • Solutions • Concluding Remarks
The Ideal Chemical Grout • Low-viscosity solution • Stable under normal temperatures • Nontoxic, non-corrosive, non-explosive • Common, inexpensive materials • Insensitive to salts and other chemicals • Controlled for varying gel times • Appreciable acceptance of dilution • Permanence • Stable pH • High strength (Karol. Chemical Grouting and Soil Stabilization. 2003)
How does MICP Fit? • Low-viscosity solution (Close to water) • Stable under normal temperatures • Nontoxic, non-corrosive, non-explosive • Common, inexpensive materials • Insensitive to salts and other chemicals • Controlled for varying gel times • Appreciable acceptance of dilution • Permanence (Occurs naturally) • Stable pH • High strength
High Strength • Comparable to gypsum cemented sands • How does the strength vary? • Composition • Temperature • pH • Synerisis (DeJong et al. Microbial Induced Cementation to Control Sand Response. 2006)
Stable pH • Commercial grouts need stable pH • MICP needs 9>pH>8.3 (alkaline) • How do other parameters relate to pH? • Strength • Permeability • Composition • Gel Time (DeJong et al. Microbial Induced Cementation to Control Sand Response. 2006)
Gel Time • Time solution takes to precipitate calcite and cement the soil • Optimal gel time? • Composition • Strength • Permeability • pH • Grouting Technology (Karol. Chemical Grouting and Soil Stabilization. 2003)
Hayward Baker Geotechnical Construction Grouting Technology • Permeation • Point Injection • Complications • Dilution • Pumping rates • Ground water flow • Stratification • Solutions • Short gel times • More is better • New ideas? (Karol. Chemical Grouting and Soil Stabilization. 2003)
Complications Dilution Ground Water Flow Stratification (Karol. Chemical Grouting and Soil Stabilization. 2003)
Solutions: Short Gel Times • Time efficient • Cost effective • Unifies grout in stratified soils (Karol. Chemical Grouting and Soil Stabilization. 2003)
Solutions: More is Better • Grout Curtains • Systematic planning • Injection grid (Karol. Chemical Grouting and Soil Stabilization. 2003)
Solutions: New Ideas • Obtaining a uniform grout zone • Using groundwater flow Sand Grout Drawdowns
Concluding Remarks • Strength test have proven MICP to be beneficial for field use • Further testing for relationships between: • Strength • Permeability • pH • Gel Time • Sensitivity • Grouting techniques to improve for centrifuge testing
References DeJong, J., Fritzges, M., Klaus Nusslein. Microbial Induced Cementation to Control Sand Response to Undrained Shear. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering-ASCE. November 2007 Karol, Reuben. Chemical Grouting and Soil Stabilization. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, NY 2003. Hawyard Baker Geotechnical Engineering Construction. 2003. 12/1/2006 – 12/5/2006. http://www.haywardbaker.com