1 / 16

MIRI Dither Patterns

MIRI Dither Patterns. Christine H Chen. Dithering Goals. Mitigate the effect of bad pixels Obtain sub-pixel sampling Self-calibrate data if changing scattered light and/or thermal emission background is significant

julian-cooper
Download Presentation

MIRI Dither Patterns

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MIRI Dither Patterns Christine H Chen

  2. Dithering Goals • Mitigate the effect of bad pixels • Obtain sub-pixel sampling • Self-calibrate data if changing scattered light and/or thermal emission background is significant • It is anticipated that dithering will enhance the majority of science observations (although some programs will require no dithering)

  3. MIRI Observing Modes • Direct Imaging • Full array • Subarray • Coronagraphic Imaging • Low Resolution Spectrograph (LRS) • Medium Resolution Spectrograph (MRS)

  4. MIRI Direct Imaging Specifications • Available Filters: 5.6, 7.7, 10.0, 11.3, 12.8 15, 18, 21, and 25.5 m • Plate Scale: 0.11/pixel • Critically sampled at 7 m • Field of View: 75x112 (680x1024 pixels) • Geometric Distortion: <0.9% at array corners Gordon & Meixner 2008

  5. Time-Variable Thermal Background • Telescope thermal emission is expected to dominate the background for  >15 m • Thermal background is expected to change due to variable telescope illumination as telescope is slewed • Self-calibration of deep fields with time-variable pedestals has been demonstrated using NICMOS HDF-N and NDF-S data (Arendt, Fixsen, & Mosley 2002) • Propose using 12-point Reuleaux and 311-point random cycling patterns to optimize self-calibration

  6. Reuleaux Triangle • Reuleaux polygon is a curve of constant width; the distance between two opposite, parallel, tangent lines to its boundary is constant • The Reuleaux triangle optimizes the figure of merit (Arendt Fixsen, & Mosley 2000), samples a wide range of spatial frequencies in a uniform manner, and is therefore well-suited to the Fixsen least-squares flat field technique • The 36-point Reuleaux triangle has been use in detailed characterization of the IRAC PSF (Marengo et al. 2008)

  7. The Random Cycling Pattern • Predetermined table of 311 dither positions • The x- and y- offsets from the array center are randomly drawn from a Gaussian distribution with a specified FWHM • Observer specifies beginning position and end position in dither pattern • Every contiguous 4 offset positions contain 1/2 pixel offsets in each direction

  8. Subpixel Sampling • Since MIRI is not badly undersampled, 0.5 pixel subsampling should be adequate for the majority of science observations • Reuleaux and Cycling patterns have 0.5 pixel offsets built-in to provide some subpixel sampling • The measured geometric distortion (<0.9% in the corners) implies that 10 pixel offsets in the center of the array will correspond to 10.1 pixel offsets in the corners of the array • A 4-point box pattern (0,0),(0,2.5),(2.5,0),(2.5,2.5) will be offered that can be used alone or in conjunction with either the Reuleaux or Cycling Patterns A. Fruchter

  9. JWST Observatory Offsetting Accuracy • Offsets smaller than 0.5 (270 pixels) do not require use of new guide stars • Commanded offsets <10 pixels will have adequate source placement precision (11 mas) for interlacing from 1/2 pixel sub-sampled images at the center of the array • Observatory will possess 7 mas jitter while pointed at a fixed position Anandakrishnan et al. 2006

  10. Proposed Direct Imaging Dither Patterns

  11. MIRI LRS Specifications • Wavelength range: 5-10 m nominal (2-14 m expected) • Slit Dimensions: 0.65.5 (5x45 pixels) • Spectral Resolution: R=100 at 7.5 m • Spatial Plate Scale: 0.11/pixel • Spectral Plate Scale: 2 pixels/resolution element • Critically sampled (spatially) at 7 m Gordon & Meixner 2008

  12. Background Subtraction • Simultaneous measurements of the sky are needed to perform background subtraction • PSF size: (1.22/D=) 0.54 at 14 m, ~1/10th slit length, suggesting that 2 dither positions separated by 1/3 of the slit length should be adequate for background subtraction

  13. Proposed LRS Observing Modes • Point Source/Staring Mode • Two dither positions with source near the center of the slit • Extended Source/Mapping Mode • Observer specified dither pattern • Number of slit positions parallel and perpendicular to the slit • The size of the offset in each direction

  14. JWST Observatory Offsetting Accuracy • Offsets smaller than 0.5 (270 pixels) do not require use of new guide stars • Observatory will possess 7 mas jitter while pointed at a fixed position • Commanded dither offsets of 1/3 slit length will place the source onto the detector with 17.1 mas precision (20% precision) adequate for 1/2 pixel subsampling Anandakrishnan et al. 2006

  15. Summary • Direct Imaging (full array) • Subpixel sampling: 4 point box • Self-Calibration: 12 point Reuleaux triangle and random cycling • LRS • Extended Source/Mapping mode • Point Source/Staring Mode

  16. Observatory Pointing Efficiency • The slew time for offsets up to 3.6 (33 pixels) will be 10 sec independent of slew size (4-point box, 12-point Reuleaux, and small Cycling patterns) • Larger slews will take exponentially longer times (medium and large Cycling patterns) Mitchell 2008 Angle (degrees)

More Related