1 / 3

Classical versus Implicit Large Eddy Simulation – Differences, Similarities and Capabilities

Classical versus Implicit Large Eddy Simulation – Differences, Similarities and Capabilities. ICFD Workshop 14 th September, 2006. Programme. 13.45 ‘Non-linear and implicit LES: Applications and connections’ (P. Tucker)

julian-snow
Download Presentation

Classical versus Implicit Large Eddy Simulation – Differences, Similarities and Capabilities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Classical versus Implicit Large Eddy Simulation – Differences, Similarities and Capabilities ICFD Workshop 14th September, 2006

  2. Programme 13.45 ‘Non-linear and implicit LES: Applications and connections’ (P. Tucker) 14.30 ‘Computing turbulent flow dynamics with implicit LES’ (F. Grinstein) 15.15 ‘Implicit LES of low and high- speed flows using high- resolution, high-order methods’ (D. Drikakis) 16.00 TEA 16.15 Open Forum Discussion 17.00 CLOSE 10.20 Introduction (A. Hutton) 10.30 ‘Grid-independent LES as a pivotal point for computational error assessment’ (B. Geurts) 11.15 ‘A framework to assess and compare LES method variants: A study of the Smagorinsky model’ (J. Meyers) 11.45 ‘LES – Addressing the near-wall problem’ (M. Leschziner) 12.30 LUNCH

  3. Open Forum Discussion – Classical versus Implicit LES • Differences – Similarities • Common ground – unifying framework even? Or • Very little overlap – distinct methods? • Capabilities • Strengths – Weaknesses • Valid areas of application • What, if anything, can each community learn from the other • What next? • Any downstream value in bringing the communities together at a follow-up forum?

More Related