1 / 18

Agenda for This Week

Agenda for This Week. Chapter 15. Analytical Hierarchy Process – Part 2. Step 2 - Synthesization. CRITERIA. Next… divide each element by column total. Step 2 - Synthesization. Relative priorities. CRITERIA. Normalized pairwise comparison matrix. Summary - Synthesization.

julianna
Download Presentation

Agenda for This Week

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Agenda for This Week

  2. Chapter 15 Analytical Hierarchy Process – Part 2

  3. Step 2 - Synthesization CRITERIA Next… divide each element by column total

  4. Step 2 - Synthesization Relative priorities CRITERIA Normalized pairwise comparison matrix

  5. Summary - Synthesization Summary of Relative Priorities for Rent, Size, Proximity and Criteria .266 .080 .654 .125 .750 .125 .737 .186 .077 .702 .101 .197 Rent Size Proximity Criteria

  6. AHP - Steps 1. Make pairwise comparisons  2. Synthesize judgments  3. Check for consistency

  7. AHP – Step 3 • A key step in the making of several pairwise comparisons is considering the consistency of the pairwise judgements. • Example: If A compared to B = 3 and B compared to C = 2 then A compared to C should = 3x2 = 6. If it wasn’t, some inconsistency would occur. • With AHP, we can measure the degree of consistency; and if unacceptable, we can revise pairwise comparisons

  8. Consistency – Step 3 • Step 1: Multiply pairwise comparison matrix by relative priorities • Step 2: Divide weighted sum vector elements by associated priority value • Step 3: Compute average (denoted lmax) of the values from Step 2. • Step 4: Compute consistency index (CI) • Step 5: Compute consistency ratio (CR)

  9. Consistency – Step 3 Step 1: Multiply pairwise comparison matrix (for rent) by relative priorities 4 1 7 1 1/4 3 1/3 1/7 1 .266 + .08 + .654 =

  10. Consistency – Step 3 Step 1: Multiply pairwise comparison matrix (for rent) by relative priorities .32 .08 .56 .265 .066 .795 .215 .093 .653 .80 .239 2.008 + + = Weighted Sum Vector

  11. Consistency – Step 3 Step 2: Divide weighted sum vector elements by associated relative priority value .80/.266 = 3.019 .239/.08 = 2.988 2.008/.654 = 3.075

  12. Consistency – Step 3 Step 3: Compute average (denoted lmax) of the values from Step 2. lmax = (3.019 + 2.988 + 3.075) / 3 = 3.027

  13. Consistency – Step 3 Step 4: Compute consistency index (CI) (where n = # items being compared) CI = (lmax - n) / (n-1) = (3.027 - 3) / 2 = .0135 This is called the Consistency Index

  14. Consistency – Step 3 Step 5: Compute consistency ratio (CR) CR = CI / RI RI = random index (CI of randomly generated pairwise comparison matrix) Value of RI is based on n n 3 4 5 6 7 8 RI 0.58 0.90 1.12 1.24 1.32 1.41

  15. Consistency – Step 3 Step 5: Compute consistency ratio (CR) CR = CI / RI = CR = .0135 / .58 = .023 Standard Rule states: If CR <= .10, consistency is acceptable!

  16. AHP - Steps 1. Make pairwise comparisons  2. Synthesize judgments  3. Check for consistency 

  17. Summary - Synthesization Summary of Relative Priorities for Rent, Size, Proximity and Criteria .266 .080 .654 .125 .750 .125 .737 .186 .077 .702 .101 .197 Rent Size Proximity Criteria

  18. Final Step • Develop Overall Priority Ranking • Overall Apartment 1 Priority .702(.266) + .101(.125) + .197(.737) = .344 • Overall Apartment 2 Priority .702(.08) + .101(.75) + .197(.186) = .169 • Overall Apartment 3 Priority .702(.653) + .101(.125) + .197(.076) = .486 Rent Size Proximity

More Related