240 likes | 398 Views
Building a Stronger, More Predictable Humanitarian Response System. Humanitarian Reform Support Unit, OCHA. Is Humanitarian Reform Needed?. Some Findings from the 2005 Humanitarian Response Review. “Well-known, long-standing gaps” “Limited linkages” between UN and non-UN actors
E N D
Building a Stronger, More Predictable Humanitarian Response System Humanitarian Reform Support Unit, OCHA
Some Findings from the 2005 Humanitarian Response Review • “Well-known, long-standing gaps” • “Limited linkages” between UN and non-UN actors • Coordination erratic and dependent on personalities • Insufficient accountability (particularly for IDPs) • Donor policies inconsistent
Changing Environment for humanitarian operations • Proliferation of humanitarian actors • Changing role of the UN (less direct implementation, more standard-setting and facilitation) • Competitive funding environment • Increased public scrutiny of humanitarian action
GOALS: • Adequate capacity and predictable leadership in all sectors • Improved coordination • Adequate, timely and flexible financing • Effective partnerships between UN and non-UN actors
Whose reform? Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Composed of NGO consortia, Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, IOM, World bank and UN agencies
Goal 1Humanitarian Reform Adequate capacity and predictable leadership in all sectors
Predictable Leadership in Humanitarian Response:Global Leads (already established) Agriculture FAO Education UNICEF Food WFP Refugees UNHCR
Predictable Leadership in Humanitarian Response:New Global “Cluster” Leads Technical areas • Nutrition UNICEF • Water/Sanitation UNICEF • Health WHO • Emergency Shelter: IDPs (from conflict) UNHCR Natural disasters IFRC ‘Convenor’ Cross-cutting areas • Camp Coord/Mgmt: IDPs (from conflict) UNHCR Natural disastersIOM • Protection: IDPs (from conflict)UNHCR Natural disasters/civilians from conflict (non-IDPs)HCR/OHCHR/UNICEF • Early Recovery UNDP Common service areas • Logistics WFP • Telecommunications OCHA/UNICEF/WFP
Responsibilities of global cluster leads • Normative • Standard setting and consolidation of ‘best practice’ • Build response capacity • Training and system development at local, regional and international levels • Surge capacity and standby rosters • Material stockpiles • Operational Support • Emergency preparedness • Advocacy and resource mobilization
Global Cluster Appeal: 2006Improving Global Humanitarian Response Capacity Appeal for USD 39 million Launched in March 2006 Received so far: USD 22 million (Nearly 60%)
Responsibilities of sector leads at the country level Ensure the following: • Inclusion of key humanitarian partners • Establishment of appropriate coordination mechanisms • Coordination with national/local authorities, local civil society etc. • Participatory and community-based approaches • Attention to priority cross-cutting issues (age, environment, gender, HIV/AIDS etc) • Needs assessment and analysis • Emergency preparedness • Planning and strategy development • Application of standards • Monitoring and reporting • Advocacy and resource mobilization • Training and capacity building • Provision of assistance and services as a last resort
Goal 2Humanitarian Reform Improved coordination
Strengthening the Humanitarian Coordinator System • Improving humanitarian coordination and leadership
Strenthening the HC System A comprehensive strategy for: • Selecting • Mentoring • Training • Appointing and • Holding accountable individuals that can deliver effective leadership in humanitarian emergencies
Actions to strengthen the HC system Establish broad-based humanitarian country teams Develop a pool of HCs (from UN and non-UN) for short-term and/or immediate deployment RC/HC “score card” Develop new training packages
Goal 3Humanitarian Reform Adequate, timely and flexible financing
Actions to improvehumanitarian financing • Good Humanitarian Donorship (GHD) initiative (being piloted in Burundi and DRC) • Establishment of CERF • Other initiatives
Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) Created to help ensure timely, adequate and flexible funding Two Windows: • Rapid Response • Under-Funded Emergencies For more information about CERF, visit http://cerf.un.org
CERF • General Assembly Resolution A/RES/60/124 decided to upgrade the CERF to US$ 500 million (US$ 50 million Loan component plus US$ 450 million Grant component). • Fully funded CERF represents 4% of global humanitarian funding (USD 500 million out of USD 13 billion) • NOT a substitute for donor contributions to the CAP
CERF contributions and allocations (Jan – Nov 2006) • Contributions/pledges - US$ 297 m • Rapid Respons allocations - US$ 112 m • Underfunded emergency allocations - US$ 76m • Total allocations - US$ 188m
Goal 4Humanitarian Reform Effective partnerships between UN and non-UN actors
Building more effective partnerships • IASC Country Teams now a requirement in all countries with HCs • Ongoing UN/non-UN dialogue, began with Geneva meeting in July 2006 • Humanitarian Community Partnership Teams to be piloted in 3 countries