250 likes | 420 Views
Session 2 – The Gap Theory. Also known as the ruin restoration theory (and other names) . Review of lesson one. God created everything in six days and rested on the seventh day (Six thousand years ago). Adam and Eve sinned and the human race and creation are subject to the curse of sin.
E N D
Session 2 – The Gap Theory Also known as the ruin restoration theory (and other names) Review of lesson one God created everything in six days and rested on the seventh day (Six thousand years ago) Adam and Eve sinned and the human race and creation are subject to the curse of sin The first world became wicked and was destroyed by a worldwide flood (Forty four hundred years ago)
What is the Gap Theory? Genesis 1:1 “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” The Gap Theory then inserts a gap here Genesis 1:2 “2The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.” This is an attempt to fit millions of years inside the Bible During this gap several things are supposed to take place
Order of events in the Gap Theory God created the heavens and the earth in Genesis 1:1 like the Bible says There was a preadamic civilization that lives on the first earth During the first earth, Lucifer rebelled and was cast out of heaven, and the first earth was destroyed because of it from Lucifer's flood After the first earth was destroyed, we come back in Genesis 1:2 when God is recreating the world that we live in now Does the Bible support this view?
Where did the Gap Theory come from? This idea of the gap theory can be traced back to the rather obscure writings of the Dutchman Episcopius (1583–1643) It was first recorded from one of the lectures of Thomas Chalmers. Chalmers (1780–1847) was a notable Scottish theologian and the first moderator of the Free Church of Scotland, and he was perhaps the man most responsible for the gap theory. Rev. William Buckland, a geologist, also did much to popularize the idea.
Although Chalmers’ writings give very little information about the gap theory, many of the details are obtained from other writers, such as the nineteenth century geologist Hugh Miller, who quoted from Chalmers’ lectures on the subject. The most notably influential nineteenth century writer to popularize this view was G. H. Pember, in his book Earth’s Earliest Ages,5 first published in 1884. Numerous editions of this work were published, the 15th edition appearing in 1942. The 20th-century writer who published the most academic defense of the gap theory was Arthur C. Custance in his work Without Form and Void.
Bible study aids such as the Scofield Reference Bible, Dake’s Annotated Reference Bible, and The Newberry Reference Bible also include the gap theory and have influenced many to accept this teaching. The basic reason for developing and promoting this view can be seen from the following very telling quotes: Dake’s Annotated Reference Bible: “When men finally agree on the age of the earth, then place the many years (over the historical 6,000) between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2, there will be Scofield Study Bible: “Relegate fossils to the primitive creation, and no conflict of science with the Genesis cosmogony remains.” no conflict between the Book of Genesis and science.”
“Evidences” for the Gap Theory “Was” or “Became” Genesis 1:2 “The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was” Genesis 1:2 for a Gap theorist “And the earth became without form, and void” By reinterpreting the word “Was” as “Became” you give the impression that there was something existing before Genesis 1:2 (The preadamic civilization according to the Gap Theory) Is this reinterpretation justifiable?
Genesis 1 and 13 grammatical comparison Genesis 1:1: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” Genesis 13:1: “Then Abram went up from Egypt, he and his wife and all that he had, and Lot with him, to the South.” Narrative begins in both of these verses
Genesis 1:2 “The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was[a] on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.” Genesis 13:2 “Abramwas very rich in livestock, in silver, and in gold.” Side step and description of object/person from the previous verse Technically known as - Waw disjunctive/ parenthetical clause
Genesis 1:3 “Then God said, “Let there be light”; and there was light.” Genesis 13:3 “And he went on his journey from the South as far as Bethel, to the place where his tent had been at the beginning, between Bethel and Ai,” Continuation of narrative (Waw consecutive) Grammatically the verses follow the same pattern, and we know in Genesis 13 that there is no gap between the verses
Problem: The Hebrew word that is used ‘hayah’ is best translated to “was” and not “became”. In all the standard translations of the Old Testament that is the way the verse is translated. In some occasions with an unusual situation if the context requires it the word can be translated ‘Become’, but the context in Genesis 1:2 and most other places do not support that translation The earliest available manuscript of Genesis 1:1–2 is found in the Greek translation of the Old Testament, called the Septuagint (LXX), which was prepared about 250–200 B.C. The LXX does not permit the reading of any ruin-reconstruction scenario into these verses
Tohu and Bohu The words tohu and bohu, usually translated “formless and void,” are used in Genesis 1:2. Gappists claim that these words imply a process of judgmental destruction and that they indicate a sinful, and therefore not an original, state of the earth. Tohu and bohu appear together in two passages outside of Genesis 1:2 (Isaiah 34:11 and Jeremiah 4:23) Gappists often look at these passages to show that those words refer to judgment and destruction
Though the expression “tohu and bohu” in Isaiah 34:11 and Jeremiah 4:23 speaks of a formlessness and emptiness resulting from divine judgment for sin, this meaning is not implicit in the expression itself but is gained from the particular contexts in which it occurs. It is not valid therefore to infer that same meaning from Genesis 1:2, where the context does not suggest any judgment. An analogy would be a blank computer screen It could be blank from being erased, or just being started!
tohu appears alone in a number of other places and in all cases simply means “formless.” The word itself does not tell us about the cause of formlessness; this has to be gleaned from the context. Isaiah 45:18 (often quoted by gappists) is rendered in the KJV “he created it not in vain [tohu], he formed it to be inhabited.” In the context, Isaiah is speaking about Israel, God’s people, and His grace in restoring them. He did not choose His people in order to destroy them, but to be their God and for them to be His people.
Isaiah draws an analogy with God’s purpose in creation: He did not create the world for it to be empty. He created it to be formed and filled. Gappists miss the point altogether when they argue that because Isaiah says God did not create the world tohu, it must have becometohu at some later time. Isaiah 45:18 is about God’s purpose in creating, not about the original state of the creation. Just as a ball of clay begins formless and void, the creation began that way! And over the six days, we see the potter create a world from the formless clay.
Asah and Bara? Gap Theorists to differentiate between the words Create (Bara) and made (Asah) inside your Bible Genesis 1:1 uses the word Bara to talk about the whole heaven and earth, while Genesis 1:16 uses the word Asah to address God making the planets (Out of what was already created) This idea has several problems though when we examine scripture here in Genesis chapter one, and in other areas of the Bible.
Problem: Bara and Asah are used interchangeably Genesis 1:26-27 “26Then God said, “Let Us make (Asah)man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” 27 So God created (Bara) man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.” They are used interchangeably in the same verse!
The detrimental verse to this idea Genesis 1:1 (NKJV) says: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” Exodus (NKJV) 20:11A “Forin six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them” Both of these verses are referring to the same thing (God creating the heavens and the earth) but use different words
Did God say to replenish the earth? Genesis 1:28 ”And God blessed them, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it” Problem: Words can change meaning over the course of time, God promised to preserve his word but he did not promise to preserve our English language The word replenish did not mean “To fill again” until about 1632, before that it simply meant to fill something… Even today you can find two definitions in you’re dictionary
Do the events during the Gap match scripture? When did Lucifer fall from heaven? Two texts speak to Lucifer falling from heave: Isaiah 14:12-15 “How you are fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How you are cut down to the ground, You who weakened the nations! For you have said in your heart: ‘I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God; I will also sit on the mount of the congregation On the farthest sides of the north; I will ascend above the heights of the clouds, I will be like the Most High.’ Yet you shall be brought down to Sheol, To the lowest depths of the Pit.
The less popular text discussing Lucifer's fall gives us a hint as to when the fall occurred Ezekiel 28:13-15 “Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created.Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire. Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee.”
Look at the order of events inside the verse “Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God… till iniquity was found in thee.” Lucifer was in Eden (made on day six) until iniquity was found in him This is the only order of events that makes sense in light of other verses: Genesis 1:31 ”And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.” Everything would not be “very good”
Lucifer's Flood? The gap theory does away with the evidence for the historical event of the global flood. If the fossil record was formed by Lucifer’s flood, then what did the global Flood of Noah’s day do? On this point the gap theorist is forced to conclude that the global Flood must have left virtually no trace. To be consistent, the gap theorist would also have to defend that the global Flood was a local event. We will deal with the Biblical evidence for the worldwide flood in a different session of this class
Death before sin? If Lucifer's flood created the fossil record, that means death and disease already existed before Adam and Eve fell This is the biggest doctrinal problem in the Gap Theory, if it was true, death existed before sinned enter the world
Are we on the second earth? Revelation 21:1 “And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away” There is no scriptural support for the Gap Theory! And much scripture opposing it! Memorization verse: Revelation 21:1 “And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away”