1 / 3

Comparison of methods

Comparison of methods. Group Projects and Clinical Conferences Margaret Delks BSN, RN, BC NUGR 550 November, 2011. Comparison of Methods. Very similar in areas of evaluation Focus on communication skills, cognitive, and affective domains Usually well accepted and learner satisfier

june
Download Presentation

Comparison of methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparison of methods Group Projects and Clinical Conferences Margaret Delks BSN, RN, BC NUGR 550 November, 2011

  2. Comparison of Methods • Very similar in areas of evaluation • Focus on communication skills, cognitive, and affective domains • Usually well accepted and learner satisfier • Support adult learning theory • Both poor for validity, reliability, efficiency, generalizability • Both difficult to evaluate without well constructed rubric

  3. Comparison of Methods • Neither method is ideal without much consideration of the objectives and desired outcomes • Participation of learners is crucial for optimal evaluation data • Require skill of the educator • Most effective when used in conjunction with other methods • More ideal as teaching methods

More Related