1 / 10

Energy-Efficient Signal Processing and Communication Algorithms for Scalable Distributed Fusion

Energy-Efficient Signal Processing and Communication Algorithms for Scalable Distributed Fusion. Wireless Sensor Networks for Fusion. Sensor networks for surveillance and reconnaissance target detection and tracking environmental applications.

Download Presentation

Energy-Efficient Signal Processing and Communication Algorithms for Scalable Distributed Fusion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Energy-Efficient Signal Processing and Communication Algorithms for Scalable Distributed Fusion

  2. Wireless Sensor Networks for Fusion Sensor networks for • surveillance and reconnaissance • target detection and tracking • environmental applications

  3. Signal Processing and Communication Challenges System constraints • limited energy (and bandwidth) resources per sensor • need for power-efficient processing algorithms and communication protocols • limitations in sensing and on-board processing equipment • limitations in type and rate of processing • interested in ensembles of measurements (e.g., maximum, average) • need for algorithms that obtain the fusion objective, not all individual measurements • large networks; changes in network topology • real-time knowledge of global topology impractical  locally constructed algorithms Additional requirements • scalability • fault-tolerance • algorithms that can compute (reduced) fusion objective over reduced topologies

  4. Objectives Desired Tasks • computation of statistics of the measurements over very large networks of wireless sensors • maximum, average, locally-averaged (in space) signal estimates Algorithmic Objectives • algorithms for data processing and relaying across the network • locally constructed, yet reliable • exploit compression benefits via distributed local fusion • designed for energy-efficient on-board processing

  5. Hierarchical Networks • Setting • hierarchical protocol for data communication and fusion • Advantages • bandwidth efficient • readily scalable hierarchy • Disadvantages • unequal distribution of resources • often power usage inefficiency • sensitivity to fusion node failures  robustness asymmetry

  6. Ad-hoc Networks • Setting • two-way local communication between closely located (“connected”) sensors • each sensor node receives messages send by connected nodes • each sensor broadcasts messages to connected nodes • Advantages • robust, readily scalable • space-uniform resource usage • transmit power efficient • Issues • need for networking

  7. Ad hoc Networks for Fusion Related work • ad hoc networks, amorphous computing Distinct features in fusion problem • interested in underlying signal in data (e.g, target location), not data • info about signal “spread” over many nodes • multiple destinations Remarks • Advantages: data compression in fusion, inherent scalability • Key problem: communication loops (contamination of information)

  8. Computation of Global Maximum Objective • Compute maximum among measurements Approach • sequence of local maximum computations • Sensor State=current maximum estimate • communication step: • Each node broadcasts its state • fusion step: • New state at its node= maximum of all received states Result: • Each node state converges to the global maximum (in finite number of steps) provided network is connected

  9. Computation of Weighted Averages Remarks • not all local averaging rules yield global average (data contamination) Approach • Locally constructed fusion rules can be designed [Scher03] which asymptotically compute • weighted averages of functions of the individual measurements (e.g. average, power, variance of measurements) Advantages • distributed, robust, readily scalable • address non-contributing node problem in distributed fashion

  10. Project Objectives Remarks • Finite delays and limitations in available energy and on-board processing  finite-time approximate computations Analysis and Optimization • Design energy-efficient methods for approximate computation of maxima, averages and other measurement statistics • Determine trade-offs on-board processing and communication power, delays and quality of computation • Non-contributing nodes need for power-efficient data relaying

More Related