40 likes | 148 Views
Borg-Warner. Three Categories of Issues Mandatory: TCE, matters about which parties must bargain Permissive: Non-TCE, matters about which parties may bargain, but may not insist Unlawful: Matters about which the parties may not bargain recognition clause? Rationale
E N D
Borg-Warner • Three Categories of Issues • Mandatory: TCE, matters about which parties must bargain • Permissive: Non-TCE, matters about which parties may bargain, but may not insist • Unlawful: Matters about which the parties may not bargain • recognition clause? • Rationale • Wording of Act, parties only required to negotiate over TCE
Borg-Warner (cont.) • Role of Board is to determine if impasse involves TCE • if so, may not get involved. • If not, may get involved as matter involves a potential 8(a)(5) violation • No M-P Distinction in Canada
Statutory Interpretation, Section 8(d) • Majority • Statute requires bargaining only over TCE • May not insist on matters over which the other party is not required to bargain • Dissent • Statute requires bargaining over TCE but does not prohibit bargaining over legal non-TCE
Does it make sense to say, as does the majority, that one party may propose a provision but not “insist” on it (HNB, pp. 637-38)? Does it make sense to say, as does the dissent, that one party may “insist” on a provision about which the other party is not legally required to bargain (OHN, pp. 630-40)? Majority vs. Dissent