1 / 7

Policy Framework Status

Policy Framework Status. aaaarch mtg, irtf, Aug. 2, 2000 Ed Ellesson co-chairs of policy framework wg: Ed Ellesson: ed_ellesson@tivoli.com John Strassner: johns@cisco.com. Overview. Objectives Influences Framework Policy Core Information Model Status. Objectives.

justinp
Download Presentation

Policy Framework Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Policy Framework Status aaaarch mtg, irtf, Aug. 2, 2000 Ed Ellesson co-chairs of policy framework wg: Ed Ellesson: ed_ellesson@tivoli.com John Strassner: johns@cisco.com

  2. Overview • Objectives • Influences • Framework • Policy Core Information Model • Status

  3. Objectives • Facilitate logically central administration by humans for a given policy domain • Drive policy-based configuration of collections of systems/devices • Must map to lower level configuration models • Must scale to thousands of managed entities • Produce effect of cooperation • among multiple heterogeneous managed entities • aggregated behavior with desired end-to-end characteristics • Protocol, device and vendor independence

  4. Influences • IETF • Policy Framework Working Group Participants • DiffServ, IntServ, IPSEC, RAP/COPS/PIB, RSVP, IPSP, LDAPext, SNMP/MIB, DHCP, etc. • New potential influences: MPLS, VPN’s • DMTF • CIM 2.3 Schema and earlier • WG’s: Network, User, SysDev, SLA, User, Applications, etc. • DEN • pre-standard ad-hoc committee

  5. Framework • Picture is in common with rap: • Management Tool • Policy Repository (Focus of policy wg is here) • Policy Decision Point • Policy Enforcement Point • Levels of Abstraction • SLA (Service Level Agreements) • SLO (Service Level Objectives) • Policy (Rules) • Configured Device Level

  6. Basic Policy Classes

  7. Policy Deliverables/Status • Policy Core Info Model (-07) in last call in IESG • PCIM mapped to directory representation to be updated and advanced dependent on above (-07) • First worked example (QOS) Policy in -01 draft • QOS device model in -01 draft, and being reconciled with mibs/pibs/conceptual model • Policy terminology draft being distributed for review by policy-related wg’s • Non-chartered drafts in other areas: mpls, ipsec, vpn’s, sls • framework draft on hold for terminology agreement

More Related