1 / 29

Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Intervention Evaluation

Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Intervention Evaluation. Shanna Shulman, PhD Melanie Besculides, DrPH. Acknowledgments. Mathematica team: Anna Katz Charlotte Hanson Henry Ireys Keith Rathbun Lisa Trebino Eileen Curley Irene Forsman, Federal Project Officer

jvela
Download Presentation

Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Intervention Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Intervention Evaluation Shanna Shulman, PhD Melanie Besculides, DrPH

  2. Acknowledgments • Mathematica team: Anna Katz Charlotte Hanson Henry Ireys Keith Rathbun Lisa Trebino Eileen Curley • Irene Forsman, Federal Project Officer • Karl White, National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management • Program staff

  3. Presentation Road Map • Background • Methods • Overview of findings • Barriers and strategies • Program implementation themes • Future directions • Conclusion

  4. Conceptual Framework for the Program Newborn Screening FurtherEvaluation Intervention Intervention Goal S S Screening beforehospital dischargeor within one month Audiologic diagnosis by three months Early interventionby six months Speech,language, social skillsdevelopmenton par withpeers at schoolentry Birth Family-to-family support Newborn Medical home

  5. Program Evaluation Background • 90% of infants screened for hearing loss • 30-50% receive follow-up screening • MPR Evaluation: • Program’s progress in achieving goals • Barriers and strategies for improvement

  6. Evaluation Focus • Diagnosis • Early intervention • Medical home • Family-to-family support

  7. Evaluation Methods • Literature review • Survey of state and territorial program coordinators • Site visits to 8 state programs (AZ, CA, MA, MN, NE, PA, TN, WY): • UNHSI staff • Hospital staff • AAP Chapter Champion • Audiologists

  8. Findings • Screening is almost universal • Gaps in follow-up remain: • Diagnostic evaluation by 3 months • Link to early intervention • Link to medical home • Link to family-to-family support

  9. Barriers to follow-up • Service system capacity • Provider knowledge • Family challenges in obtaining services • Information gaps

  10. System Capacity: What Is Lacking • Equipment to perform screenings • Audiologists to perform evaluation • Intervention services focused on infant/toddler hearing • Family-to-family support services

  11. Strategies for Lack of Equipment • Seek grants to purchase equipment • Maintain alternate screening opportunities

  12. WA ME MT ND VT MN OR NH MA ID WI NY SD RI WY MI CT PA NJ IA NE NV OH DE IN IL UT CO WV VA KS MO CA KY NC TN AZ OK AR SC NM GA AL MS TX LA FL AK HI Rate of Audiologists per 10,000 Births MD DC Fewer than 2 audiologists per 10,000 births 2 – 2.99 audiologists per 10,000 births 3 – 3.99 audiologists per 10,000 births More than 4 audiologists per 10,000 births

  13. Strategies for Lack of Audiology Services • Conduct outreach and training • Work to increase reimbursement (commercial and public)

  14. Strategies for Lack of EI, Family-to-Family Services • Implement training, specialized curricula • Tap community resources • Partner with other organizations • Hire regional parent coordinators

  15. Provider Knowledge: Barriers • Lack of protocols for standardized screening and presentation of results • Low volume of patients decreases quality of screening, follow-up, and evaluation services • Lack of provider knowledge about UNHSI and key partners • “Wait-and-see” attitude among PCPs

  16. Strategies for Lack of Protocols and Low Patient Volume • Provide TA to screening hospitals • Make follow-up appointment before discharge • Concentrate screening in small group • Provide ongoing training, particularly for low-volume areas

  17. Strategies for Lack of Knowledge, Attitudes • Outreach and training • Single point of contact to link families to services • Education, colleague-to-colleague training

  18. Family Barriers to Obtaining Services • Pre-authorization requirements, lack of insurance • Need to go to unfamiliar location for evaluation • Lack of transportation to audiologist • Transient living situations and language barriers

  19. Strategies to Help Families Get Services • Facilitate pre-authorization or enrollment in public assistance programs • Establish relationship with audiology center

  20. Strategies to Help Families Get Services • Partner with existing programs • Develop education materials in other languages • Use translation services • Hire bilingual staff

  21. Information Gaps: Barriers • Poor communication among hospitals, PCPs, audiologists, and program • Data systems not accessible to providers • Privacy laws impede agency sharing

  22. Strategies to Improve Communication • Train hospital staff on importance of relaying complete information • Use existing data sources to complete missing data fields • Use specialized software, metabolic screening cards, or electronic birth certificates to convey results

  23. Strategies to Improve Use of Data • Use web-based systems to facilitate real-time transmission of results, contact information, and track follow-up • Establish data-sharing procedures • Secure family permission for data sharing

  24. 1. Program Implementation Varies by State • Legislation • Infrastructure • Privacy laws

  25. 2. More Mature Programs Are Farther Along • Established reporting relationships • Internal data and tracking capabilities • Relationships with early intervention and family-to- family support services • Effective follow-up strategies • Cross-agency communication

  26. 3. Program Priorities on the Right Track • Improving data and tracking systems • Enhancing provider knowledge • Increasing EI service system capacity • Improving family services

  27. 4. Infant Hearing Loss Is Low Incidence • Volume matters • Providers require ongoing training • Coordinating entity is important

  28. Future Program Directions • Improve data systems to support surveillance and follow-up • Build additional capacity • Develop family-to-family support services • Promote importance of early detection

  29. As Things Stand • Programs poised to take action • Model of collaboration in public health

More Related