180 likes | 189 Views
This senior thesis explores the lighting depth in the Science Building at Buffalo State College. It focuses on enhancing the lighting in working spaces, the atrium, and outdoor areas, while adhering to energy-saving criteria and design intent.
E N D
AE Senior Thesis2010 Buffalo State CollegeScience Building – Phase 1 Marie Ostrowski - Lighting/Electrical - April 14, 2010
INTRODUCTION • Project Overview • College within the State University of New York system • School of Natural and Social Sciences • New Science Building Phase 1 Addition - 96,000 ft2 • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Criteria: • Maintain Architect’s theme + Design Intent • Establish energy consumption/savings • Evaluate alternative motor controller arrangement Buffalo State College BSC Campus source: www.maps.google.com N Courtesy of Cannon Design source: www.buffalostate.edu
LIGHTING DEPTH pts • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary Director’s Office * Genetics Teaching Lab Facade Atrium *Not presented
LIGHTING DEPTH – WORKING SPACE GENETICS TEACHING LAB F13 F14 F15 F16 F17 • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Goals • Flexible, efficient space • Criteria • LPD ≤ 1.4 W/ft2 • 50 fc at task plane (36”) • Uniformity at Task Surfaces • Materials: Furniture Flooring Walls Ceiling
LIGHTING DEPTH – WORKING SPACE 2) 1 ) • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Performance: • LPD = 1.29W/ft2 • Maximum ceiling luminance = 550 cd/m2 2 ) 3) 2 ) Average Illuminance: 33.75 fcSwitched Ambient, Board + Perimeter On 3) Average Illuminance: 22.98 fcSwitched Ambient, Board On Average Illuminance: 52.64 fcAll ambient and perimeter on
LIGHTING DEPTH – OUTDOOR SPACE FACADE L1 F11 F12 • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Goals • Expose interior corridor walls, create depth with varying light levels • Criteria • LPD : • 30 W/lin. Ft. (Entrance) • 1 W/lin. Ft. (Walkway) • 0.2 W/sq. ft (Façade) • 5fc at the entrance and walkway • Materials: • Alternating aluminum and clear glass panels
LIGHTING DEPTH – OUTDOOR SPACE • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Performance: • LPD complies with 26W to spare considering the 5% unrestricted allowance • Average walkway illuminance 3.7fc
LIGHTING DEPTH – ATRIUM atrium F6 F7 F8 M1 • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Goals • Highlight height of space, create a sense of movement, mimic rectilinear geometries • Criteria • LPD : • 0.6 W/ft2 (Level 1) • 0.5 W/ft2 (Level 2 + 3) • Horizontal Illuminance: 10fc • Materials: A B A B Existing Walls Corridor Walls Ceiling Floor/Accent Wall
LIGHTING DEPTH – ATRIUM atrium F6 F7 F8 M1 • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Goals • Highlight height of space, create a sense of movement, mimic rectilinear geometries • Criteria • LPD : • 0.6 W/ft2 (Level 1) • 0.5 W/ft2 (Level 2 + 3) • Horizontal Illuminance: 10fc • Materials: A B A B Existing Walls Corridor Walls Ceiling Floor/Accent Wall
LIGHTING DEPTH – ATRIUM atrium F6 F7 F8 M1 • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Goals • Highlight height of space, create a sense of movement, mimic rectilinear geometries • Criteria • LPD : • 0.6 W/ft2 (Level 1) • 0.5 W/ft2 (Level 2 + 3) • Horizontal Illuminance: 10fc • Materials: A B A B Existing Walls Corridor Walls Ceiling Floor/Accent Wall
LIGHTING DEPTH – ATRIUM • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Performance: • LPD • Level One = 0.62 • Level Two = 0.28 • Level Three = 0.35 • Complies Overall • Average Illuminance • One: 12.84 fc • Two: 12.54 fc • Three: 18.67 fc
DAYLIGHTING EXISTING SYSTEMS Available Daylight • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary
DAYLIGHTING • Proposed redesign • Electric Light Integration • - Open Loop Switching • - Three Zones • Energy Savings Summary • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary
ACOUSTICAL BREADTH • ACOUSTICS • Carpeting vs. Tile Flooring • Existing • Level One Replaced w/ Carpeting • All Atrium Flooring Replaced w/ Carpeting • Comparison at 1,000 Hz • Target Range: 1.3-1.9 s • Results: • RT = 1.75 • RT = 1.36 • RT = 1.16 • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary
LED STUDY LED Luminaire Options • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • 21 luminaires arranged perpendicular to tables • 2) 16 luminaires parallel and in between lab tables Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Average Illuminance: 44.4 fc Payback Period: 16 years Average Illuminance: 41.5 fc Payback Period: 7 years
ELECTRICAL DEPTH • Motor Controller Center Design • Existing Distribution • Direct Replacement: Motor Loads = 2867.9 A • Removing Chillers: Motor Loads = 1341.9 A • -reduces size of incoming feeder bus • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary
PROJECT SUMMARY • summary • LIGHTING: Illuminated spaces to satisfy IESNA standards and ASHRAE power requirements • DAYLIGHTING: Reduced annual energy consumption by over 50% with integrated photosensor system • ACOUSTICS: Validated improvements with alternative flooring; not critical to implement • LED STUDY: Alternative general illumination system for labs insufficient • ELECTRICAL: MCC designed for mechanical penthouse is not practical • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary
Acknowledgements Thank you to: AE FacultyCannon Design Family Classmates + Friends thank you