200 likes | 252 Views
Explore the political discernment versus environmental concerns, the influence of special interest groups over public interest, and the complexities of creating and implementing sustainable environmental policies. Delve into the shifting support for environmental issues, economic prioritization, legislative challenges, and media narratives shaping public perception. Discover the paradoxes in environmental policy, the impact of climate change, and the evolving landscape of environmental legislation in the political realm.
E N D
“SUSTAINIBILITYPROJECT”Gregory C. MorrisColumbus State18 April 2011
Innovation of Environmental Policy. • Special Interest Groups v Public Interest. • Political Discernment v. Environmental Concerns.
Environmental Policy Creation and implementation of legislation to ensure sustainability.
1st Issue • Political Discernment versus Environmental Concerns. How does the environment rank in the realm of politics?
Support for Environment received its strongest support during the 1970’s. • Support has declined in recent decades.
Economic issues often take priority over environmental issues. • Environment does not cause urgency.
Legislation is reactive NOT proactive. • Gradual changes cause a “stuck in the mud” effect.
In the political realm one type of green does not equal another type of green!
2nd Issue 2) Special Interest v. Public Interest. Why does special interest appear to have more influence?
Special Interest - Have built in advantages: • Better organized. • Unification. • Benefits for elected officials.
Policy Paradox Africa is allowed to increase carbon emissions. Carbon disrupts the climate.
Policy Paradox CAA/CWA increased standards for quality. But the implementation of the standards has been reduced.
Policy Paradox Political division over environmental issues worsen even though people agree that there the environment is important.
Environmental Legislation • Fragmented • Incremental • Lack of Enforcement
MEDIA 1960’s- Only Economic Concerns. “Economic Poison” Industry favored 82%.
MEDIA Pro-Environment messages- Negative 80%. “Doom and Gloom”
NIMBY Not In My Back Yard. Environment Impact: • Individuals • Families
Future Legislation Moving Target: • Technology • Tougher Strategies. • Climate Change (Global Warming.
Future Legislation • Pluralism- Issues and Parties involved. • Polarized Congress. • Educated Public.