1 / 27

Theories of Vision: a swift overview

Theories of Vision: a swift overview . 16-721: Advanced Machine Perception A. Efros, CMU, Spring 2006. Most slides from Steve Palmer . Tale of Martians with an old PC. Categorization of Theories. “ Why do things looks as they do?” -- Kurt Koffka (1935) Nativism vs. Empiricism

kaelem
Download Presentation

Theories of Vision: a swift overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Theories of Vision: a swift overview 16-721: Advanced Machine Perception A. Efros, CMU, Spring 2006 Most slides from Steve Palmer

  2. Tale of Martians with an old PC

  3. Categorization of Theories • “Why do things looks as they do?” -- Kurt Koffka (1935) • Nativism vs. Empiricism • “Because we were born(evolved) to see them that way” vs. • “Because we have learned to see them that way” • Atomisn vs. Holism • “because of the way each pixel appears” vs. • “because of the way the entire scene appears” • Organism vs. Environment • “Because we are the way we are” vs. • “Because the world is the way it is”

  4. Structuralism © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  5. Structuralism Trained Introspection Atomism Organism Chemistry Empiricism © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  6. Proposed by Wilhelm Wundt, the father of modern Psychology. Structuralism Structuralism: Perception results from the association of basic sensory atoms in memory via repeated, prior joint occurrences. Derived from philosophy of British Empiricists (e.g., Locke, Berkeley, Hume, and Mills). © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  7. Redness at (x1,y1) Greenness at (x3,y3) Yellowness at (x2,y2) Retinal mosaic Structuralism Sensory Atoms © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  8. Structuralism Perceptual Complexes Retinal mosaic © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  9. Red apple at (x0,y0) Structuralism Perceptual Complexes Retinal mosaic © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  10. Structuralism Chemical Analogy Perceptions are made of basic sensory experiences just as molecules are made of basic atoms. © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  11. Gestaltism Naive Introspection Holism Organism EM Fields Nativism © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  12. Max Wertheimer Wolfgang Köhler Kurt Koffka Gestaltism Gestaltism: Perception results from the interaction between the intrinsic structure of the stimulus and the intrinsic structure of the brain. © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  13. Gestaltism Principles of Gestalt Theory Holism: The whole is different from the sum of its parts. Prägnanz: The percept will be as “good” as the prevailing conditions allow, I.e. simplest explanation • Nativism: • Not a total rejection of learning, but rejection of • Its primacy.

  14. Gestaltism Holism: The whole is different from the sum of its parts. Emergent properties: Features of a configuration that are not features of its components, e.g.: • length • orientation • curvature • closure • connectedness © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  15. What is this? square & circle? square & pacman? squigit & pacman? Gestaltism Prägnanz: the percept will be as “good” as the prevailing conditions allow etc…. © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  16. Field of a single positive charge Field of a pair of positive charges Field of a positive & a negative charge Gestaltism Field Theoretic Analogy Repulsion Attraction © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  17. Ecological Optics Mechanical Resonance Ecological Analysis Holism Nativism Environment © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  18. Ecological Optics Ecological Optics: Perception is the direct apprehension of the visible environment by extracting invariants in the dynamic ambient optic array and the affordances of objects. James J. Gibson: Ask not what’s inside your head, but what your head’s inside of! (Ecological optics is a theory of stimulus structure.) © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  19. Ecological Optics Direct Perception: Perception is not mediated by processes like unconscious thinking Perception of the 3-D world is NOT ambiguous for an actively exploring organism. © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  20. Tile floor Geometric surface Wheat field Ecological Optics Texture Gradients are gradual changes in the size & shape of texture elements in an image when a plane recedes in depth. © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  21. Bird flying Plane landing Ecological Optics Motion Gradients are gradual changes in the speed and direction of elements in optic flow within the dynamic ambient optic array. © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  22. Constructivism Logical Inference Likelihood Analysis (both) (both) (both) © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  23. Constructivism Constructivism: Perception is the result of unconscious inferences about the scene most likely to have caused the retinal image or event. Hermann von Helmholtz originated the idea of unconscious inference and the likelihood principle. © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  24. Constructivism Unconscious Inference: the process of recovering environmental information by logically combining retinal information with heuristic assumptions. Tilted room illusion: If you assume that the walls and floor of the room are vertical and horizontal, then you must be tilted —and you feel that way! © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  25. Constructivism Tilted room illusion © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  26. What is this? etc…. square & circle? square & pacman? squigit & pacman? Constructivism Prägnanz vs. Likelihood What governs what we see: goodness or probability? © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

  27. Conclusions So which theory is correct? Probably none of them! Or maybe all of them, to some degree! It’s good to keep them in mind, when Designing your algorithms! © Stephen E. Palmer, 2002

More Related