120 likes | 259 Views
P rocurement E valuation & R eengineering T eam. February 7, 2012. PERT Charter. Support DOE/NNSA Procurement Executives and the Contractor Supply Chain Council Procurement System Reviews Procurement Process Improvements Procurement Knowledge Management Procurement Training
E N D
ProcurementEvaluation &ReengineeringTeam February 7, 2012
PERT Charter • Support DOE/NNSA Procurement Executives and the Contractor Supply Chain Council • Procurement System Reviews • Procurement Process Improvements • Procurement Knowledge Management • Procurement Training • Procurement Performance Measurement and Management • “Other” related business management initiatives, studies, and other projects, as assigned
Procurement System Reviews • PERT Peer review process • Provide independent verification and validation of the contractor’s procurement system and self-assessments • Provide input to DOE-CO for procurement system recertification • Identify and share best practices • “Forward looking, pragmatic, advisory” instead of “prescriptive, legalistic, audit- and compliance-driven”
Procurement Process Improvements • Evaluate current trends in procurement • Share current effective processes • (site and review team) • Identify “best practices” during peer reviews • Arrange for demonstrations of “best practices” at annual PERT meeting • Display on PERT website.
Procurement Performance Measurement and Management • DOE Balanced ScoreCard (BSC) Performance Measurement Program for Purchasing and Personal Property Management Systems • Established December 17, 1997 • Measures/Metrics developed by PERT • Last updated for FY2012 • Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies (CAPS) DOE/NNSA procurement performance benchmarking • Prior to FY2012 conducted biennially • Now annually • Latest questionnaire 58 questions (with sub questions)
“Other” related business management initiatives, studies, and other projects, as assigned • Cost Improvement Reporting Template/Guidelines • Standardized Contract Format - Standard Research Subcontract (Educational Institution and Non-Profit Organizations)
PERT Opportunities, Challenges and Goals in 2012Opportunities • Improve recognition for PERT participation and sites successful review • Training and recruitment of new PERT review team members • Transformation to risk based review with focus on process improvements and efficiencies • Evaluate and revise PERT Review criteria
PERT Opportunities, Challenges and Goals in 2012Challenges • Budget Constraints • Travel, training, • Succession Planning • Skill mix of teams, subject matter experts • Membership on and support for multiple committees (PERT, ICPT, SCMC, CSCC) • Overlapping objectives, competing /conflicting priorities • Site management commitment to PERT Participation • Time commitment for PERT reviews • IT support demands
PERT Opportunities, Challenges and Goals in 2012Goals • Revise final report transmittal letter to acknowledge noteworthy practices and recognize effort in preparing for and completing review • Focus on increasing the pool of individuals qualified as PERT Review team lead and team member • Establish standard for participation on PERT Review • Develop training for new PERT Review team members • Review and revise as necessary • Website • Criteria • Handbook • Clarify applicability of Peer Review Process and review frequency of PERT reviews