1 / 31

Hover Widgets: Using the Tracking State to Extend the Capabilities of Pen-Operated Devices

Hover Widgets: Using the Tracking State to Extend the Capabilities of Pen-Operated Devices. Tovi Grossman Ken Hinckley Patrick Baudisch Maneesh Agrawala Ravin Balakrishnan. Dynamic Graphics Project Dept of Computer Science University of Toronto www.dgp.toronto.edu.

kailey
Download Presentation

Hover Widgets: Using the Tracking State to Extend the Capabilities of Pen-Operated Devices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hover Widgets: Using the Tracking State to Extend the Capabilities of Pen-Operated Devices Tovi Grossman Ken Hinckley Patrick Baudisch Maneesh Agrawala Ravin Balakrishnan Dynamic Graphics Project Dept of Computer Science University of Toronto www.dgp.toronto.edu Adaptive Systems and Interaction Research Group Microsoft Research www.research.microsoft.com

  2. Pen-Based Interfaces • Great for notes, sketches • Lack of shortcuts problematic

  3. Pen-Based Interfaces • Great for notes, sketches • Lack of shortcuts problematic • Round trip problem

  4. Localized User Interfaces • Gesture Interaction • Tivoli (Moran, Chiu, Melle. UIST ’97) • SKETCH (Zeleznik, Herndon & Hughes. SIGGRAPH ’96) • DENIM (Newman, Lin, Hong & Landay. HCI ’03) • Menu Interaction • Marking Menu (Kurtenbach & Buxton. CHI ’93) • Flow Menu (Guimbretière & Winograd. UIST ’03) • Scroll ring (Smith & schraefel. Moscovich & Hughes. UIST ’04) • Hybrid • Scriboli (Hinckley, Baudisch, Ramos, & Guimbretière. CHI ’05)

  5. Localized User Interfaces • Gesture Interaction • Ink confused with gesture • Explicitly switch with button • Menu Interaction • Activated with button

  6. Localized User Interfaces

  7. Localized User Interfaces

  8. Localized User Interfaces

  9. Design Challenge • Localized user interface • Clearly distinct from ink input • No button required

  10. Tracking menus Fitzmaurice G., Khan A., Pieke R., Buxton B., Kurtenbach G.UIST 2003

  11. Hover Widgets • Gesture in tracking state • Widget fades in • Click on widget

  12. Hover Widgets

  13. Design Considerations • Shape

  14. Design Considerations • Shape • Recognition

  15. Design Considerations • Shape • Recognition • Visualization

  16. DEMO

  17. Experiment

  18. Independent Variables • Technique (Hover Widget, Icon) • GridN (4, 8, 12) • Distance (300, 600, 900, 1200)

  19. Results • Reduced Movement Time

  20. Results • Reduced Movement Time • Increased Accuracy

  21. Summary • New distinct command layer • Button free • Localized UI • Reduce time • Minimal shift of attention

  22. Future Work • Customize & adapt

  23. Future Work • Customize & adapt • Large displays

  24. Acknowledgements • Members of The Microsoft Research Adaptive Systems & Interaction group • Members of the Microsoft Research Visualization and Interaction Group • Members of the University of Toronto Dynamic Graphics Lab • David Thiel • Study Participants

  25. Questions?

  26. Using the Tracking State • Tool tips

  27. Using the Tracking State • Tool tips • Input panel gesture

  28. Pilot Study

  29. False Activations

  30. Visualization

  31. Learning

More Related