1.03k likes | 1.63k Views
CHAPTER 12 Natural Selection and Adaptation. ADAPTATIONS. ADAPTATIONS. ADAPTATIONS. Most adaptations are complex The appearance of design. ADAPTATIONS. Adaptations have been “designed” by a completely “mindless” process Evolutionary theory does not admit anticipation of future
E N D
ADAPTATIONS • Most adaptations are complex • The appearance of design
ADAPTATIONS • Adaptations have been “designed” by a completely “mindless” process • Evolutionary theory does not admit anticipation of future • Teleological (incorrect) view – processes which invoke goals or end points
Adaptation by Evolution by Natural Selection!!! • Evolutionary theory by Natural Selection must be able to account for the origin of complex adaptations that increase ones fitness • But, Natural Selection must also be able to account for traits that do not increase fitness (e.g. bee sting, anaphylactic shock)
Adaptation • Hitchhiking • linkage to another allele that increases fitness • Stable Equilibrium • natural selection must be acting in such ways to maintain variation; it does not necessarily cause fixation of a single best genotype
Tungara Frog – Conflicting Selection • If males “CHUCK” females will respond favorably YET….. Exposes males to greater risk of predation by bats
Tungara FrogConflictingSelection Tuni Tungara
Natural Selection • Definition of Natural Selection: • Include a trait must vary among biological entities, and there must be a consistent relationship between the trait and one or more components of reproductive success • Short version of Natural Selection: • Any consistent difference in fitness among phenotypically different biological entities (inherited)
Adaptation • Process of becoming adapted Or • To the features of organisms that enhance reproductive success relative to other possible features
Recognizing Adaptation? • Includes a Phylogenetic Component • Fleas (wingless adaptation) • Bristle tails (primitively wingless) • Traits evolve from pre-existing ones so its’ phylogenetic position is important • Preadaptation • a feature that fortuitously serves a new function (the kea in New Zealand)
What is Adaptation? • Our definition • a feature is an adaptation for some function if it has become prevalent or is maintained in a population because of natural selection for that function
Nonadaptive Traits • Trait might be necessary consequence (flying fish) • Evolved by random genetic drift rather than Natural Selection (grouse chick patterns – cryptic but drift in patterns occur among species) • Hitchhiking (linkage of traits) • has not become adaptively altered to a response (big fruits, extinct mammals)
How do we recognize adaptations? • Complexity • Design • Experimental Evidence • Comparative Method – uses phylogeny to compare trait evolution among groups of species • Convergent Evolution – trait which is correlated between lineages (2 different groups evolved the same or similar adaptation independently)
Our View of Evolution up to this point... • Genetic Drift, Inbreeding & Gene Flow act at the same rate on ALL LOCI • NOW.... We will see how selection dictates rates and directions of change
The Difference Natural Selection Makes • Natural Selection is profoundly different from previously described mechanisms which lead to evolution (drift, inbreeding, gene flow) • Sexual reproduction – Allele frequency changes proceed INDEPENDENTLY at different loci
Natural Selection VS. Evolution • Natural Selection is NOT THE SAME as Evolution! • Evolution is a 2-step process: • Origin of genetic variation by mutation and recombination • Followed by change due to an agent (eg. Natural Selection, drift, etc...)
Natural Selection VS. Evolution by Natural Selection • Natural Selection differs from Evolution by Natural Selection • Evolution can occur w/o Natural Selection (e.g. drift) • Natural Selection can occur w/o Evolution (e.g. genotypes differ in each generation by fecundity but their proportions stay the same)
So... What is Natural Selection? • Natural Selection can have no Evolutionary effect unless phenotypes differ in genotypes! • Why? if naturally selected phenotypes are not heritable (genetically based) then Evolution of phenotype cannot occur!
So... What is Natural Selection? • Natural Selection = variation in the average reproductive success among phenotypes • Remember: Without variation there cannot be evolution! • EG: Horse tail / Fly
Modes of Selection • Directional Selection: if 1 phenotype is the fittest (e.g. size) • Stabilizing Selection: if an intermediate phenotype is fittest • Disruptive Selection: if 2 or more phenotypes are fitter than the intermediates between them
Modes of Selectionorange = fittest genotype • Directional Selection A1 A1> A1 A2 = A2 A2 • Stabilizing Selection A1 A1< A1 A2> A2 A2 • Disruptive Selection A1 A1> A1 A2 < A2 A2
So, What is Fitness? • The fitness of a genotype is the average per capita lifetime contribution of individuals of that genotype to the population after one or more generations (more detail on p. 366) • Lets look at an example..
Calculating Fitness • Genotype A 0.05 (=5%) survive to reproduce Average adult has 60 offspring (fraction surv.) X (ave. fecundity)= R R = per capita replacement rate (0.05) X (60) = 3 = RA • Genotype B 0.10 survive and ave. fecundity = 40 (0.10) X (40) = 4 = RB
Calculating Fitness • So, if 20% of population was genotype A and 80% was genotype B • We can calculate the Average Growth Rate per generation of the population R = (0.2)(3) + (0.8)(4) = 3.8
Calculating Fitness Ri = absolute fitness (where “i” refers to a particular genotype, e.g. A or B) R = Average fitness
Calculating Fitness • What we are REALLY interested in is not R.... • We are interested in RELATIVE FITNESS W • W = the value of R relative to that of a reference genotype (this tells us how much more fit one genotype is than another)
Calculating Relative Fitness (W) • The genotype with the highest Ri is assigned 1 • The other genotypes are calculated in relation to this reference • for our example, we assign WB = 1 (because genotype B has highest R) • Then we can calculate WA RA/RB = ¾ = 0.75 = WA
Average Relative Fitness W = (similar to R) = the average fitness of individuals in a population relative to the fittest genotype For our example: (0.2)(0.75) + (0.8)(1.0) = 0.95 = W
Relative Fitness and the Rate of Change The rate of change under selection depends on the RELATIVE FITNESS (NOT THE ABSOLUTE FITNESS)
Calculating Fitness in Asexual Populations • p = NA / N • q = NB / N • N = population size at beginning of generation • After 1 generation NARA & NBRB • So the new frequency of genotype A = p’
Calculating Fitness in Asexual Populations p’ = frequency of genotype A in next generation... p’ = pNRA / (pNRA + qNRB) or p’ = pRA / (pRA + qNRB)
Calculating Fitness in Asexual Populations the change in frequency of p: ∆ p = p’ – p or ∆ p = pq(RA-RB) / (pRA+qRB) lets see an example...
Calculating Fitness in Asexual Populations Our old example: p = 0.2 and q =0.8 lets calculate ∆ p: (0.2)(0.8) (3-4) [0.2 (3)] + [0.8 (4)] ∆ p = -0.16 / 3.8 = -0.042
What did this tell us? RA and RB 6 and 8 or 9 and 12 or 300 and 400 Relative fitness, W, determines the rate of change!!! WA : WB = 0.75 : 1
From Relative fitness to Selection! • Now that we can calculate the relative fitness of genotypes we can then quantify selection per genotype! • si = Selection coefficient • si measures the intensity of selection AGAINST a less fit allele and, thus, tells us something about the Selective Advantage of the more fit allele.
Example of Si • Remember our recurring example: • WA = 0.75 and WB = 1 • we can also write WA = 1 – sA • Therefore the selection coefficient for genotype A would be sA = 0.25 [WA = 0.75 = 1-sA]
Using Si to figure out ∆ p • since WA = 0.75 and SA = 0.25 (remember that we associated p with genotype A) ∆ p = pq([1-sA]-1) p(1-sA+ q1) or -sApq 1-sAp
What did this tell us about Selection? -sApq 1-sAp • ∆ p is negative as long as p, q, and s are positive! this means: genotype A will decrease in frequency because its fitness is lower than genotype B
What did this tell us about Selection? -sApq 1-sAp = ∆ p 2) ∆ p = directly proportional to the NUMERATOR (-spq) This means that the rate of change is greater when both alleles are common with the maximum being p=0.5 and q=0.5 Numerator Denominator
What did this tell us about Selection? -sApq 1-sAp = ∆ p 3) ∆ p = inversely proportional to the denominator which really = W which is the average relative fitness We can express W as: p(1-sA) + q(1) = W Numerator Denominator
What did this tell us about Selection? • As p approaches zero, the evolutionary rate SLOWS down! • Meaning: most individuals in the population are carrying the more fit genotype
Where in Life Cycles Does Selection Act? • Selection can act on multiple points in sexually reproducing populations • Viability Selection • Sexual Selection • Fecundity Selection • Gamete Selection • Compatibility Selection
Evolution by Natural Selection • By the way in which changes in allele frequencies are determined by the components of fitness of each zygotic and each gametic genotype • These components of fitness are combined (multiplied) to represent the overall fitness of each genotype • Remember, previously we multiplied the survival X fecundity = overall fitness