1 / 30

Depleted Uranium (DU): More than you want to know . . . But what every health physicist ought to know

Depleted Uranium (DU): More than you want to know . . . But what every health physicist ought to know. Ronald L. Kathren, CHP. Ronald L. Kathren, CHP Professor Emeritus Washington State University at Tri-Cities Presented at a breakfast meeting of the Columbia Chapter

kalea
Download Presentation

Depleted Uranium (DU): More than you want to know . . . But what every health physicist ought to know

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Depleted Uranium (DU):More than you want to know . . . But what every health physicist ought to know Ronald L. Kathren, CHP Ronald L. Kathren, CHP Professor Emeritus Washington State University at Tri-Cities Presented at a breakfast meeting of the Columbia Chapter of the Health Physics Society Richland, WA November 15, 2007 (at the ungodly hour of 7 AM!)

  2. Historical and General Introduction • Human experience with uranium goes back two millennia – the Romans used uranium oxide to impart a yellow color to ceramic glazes • At least as early as the 1400’s, pitchblende, extracted from the Joachimsthal mines, was used to color glass • Uranium was discovered by German chemist Martin Klaproth in 1789; named after planet Uranus

  3. Natural Uranium • A dense (ρ = 18.68 g cm-3), silvery white weakly radioactive and chemically toxic heavy metal • Ubiquitous in the environment (heaviest natural element) • ; NatU contains Three isotopes: U-238 99.27 wt % ~ 50% of activity U-235 0.72 wt % U-234 0.0057 wt % ~ 50% of activity • Several valence states (+4, +5, +6); compounds range fromsoluble(UF6, UCl4) toinsoluble(typically oxides – UO2, UO3, UO4, U3O8 • Pyrophoric – particulates oxidize quickly in air

  4. More History • Uranium metal isolated in 1841 by French chemist Eugene-Melchior Peligot • Radioactivity of uranium was discovered in March 1896 by French physicist Henri Becquerel • Fission of U discovered in 1939 by German chemists Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann; process explained by physicists in exile Lise Meitner and Otto Frisch

  5. Toxicological Studies • First toxicological studies by chemist Christian Gmelin (1824); concluded that uranium was “a feeble poison” • Gmelin’s work confirmed by other researchers over the next several decades • Since about 1860 until discovery of insulin in 1920’s used therapeutically to treat diabetes mellitus

  6. Toxicological Studies II • Extensive studies of U toxicity in Manhattan District confirmed low level of toxicity • Low order of toxicity further butressed by studies of accidental exposures and epidemiologic studies of U workers • Use of DU in Gulf Wars and Kosovo generated new interest and intensive study but many questions still remain

  7. Production of Depleted Uranium • A byproduct of the enrichment process • Two basic methods: Gaseous diffusion Gas centrifugation • U-235 content reduced to 0.2 wt % • Specific activity about 60% of NatU • 88.8% of activity from 238U, 9.9% from 234U and only 1.1% from 235U

  8. Radiological Characteristics of DU

  9. Uses of Depleted Uranium • Pigments • Industrial catalyst • Counterweight for aircraft control surfaces • Ballast for ships • Radiation shielding • Munitions • Armor

  10. Munitions Usage • High density and self sharpening characteristics provide excellent armor piercing capability • High density and strength also make it excellent for tank armor • DU penetrators produce airborne particulates of typically high fired and hence insoluble DU which fall out close to the point of impact and produce localized ground contamination

  11. Toxicokinetics • Oral absorption poor – few per cent • Percutaneous absorption has not been observed in humans • Absorption following inhalation a function of solubility, particle size; ICRP lung model applies • Approximately 70% of absorbed U is excreted in first 24 hours, largely via urine

  12. Biokinetic Models for Uranium • Several biokinetic models for U have been proposed over last 50 years • ICRP Publication 69 (1995) likely most generally used and accepted model • Other models have been proposed; in general are similar to and basically refinements of ICRP model • Models may not fit well – solubility, route of intake are important factors

  13. Inhaled Uranium • Rely on ICRP lung model • Type F Compounds [UF6, UO2F, UO2(NO3)2] – 100% absorption of fraction not excreted via GI tract with half time of 10 min • Type M Compounds (UO3, UF4, UCl4, U3O8) – 10% absorption of fraction not excreted via GI tract with half time of 10 min; remaining 90% of nonexcreted fraction has half time of 140 days • Type S Compounds (UO2, U3O8) – low and slow absorption – of the fraction not cleared via GI tract, 99.9% absorbed via respiratory tract with half life of 7000 days (~ 19 years) • Note: Some compounds such as U3O8 may behave as Class M or Class S under specific circumstances

  14. Ingested Uranium • Gut absorption poor – f1 = 1-2% for soluble U, order of magnitude less for insoluble forms • ICRP uses 0.02 for soluble forms and 0.002 for highly insoluble forms, the latter specified as UO2 and U3O8. • Gut absorption may be affected by food

  15. Percutaneous Absorption • Not likely – no evidence to support transfer through unbroken human skin • May enter blood through cuts and abrasions • Depositions in wounds may remain for years, slowly releasing U and progeny into systemic circulation; kidney concentration builds up with time

  16. Absorption and Distribution • Once absorbed into systemic circulation, most U is quickly excreted via the kidneys • Small fractions are deposited in skeleton, liver and kidney • Depots may have both long and short term residence compartments

  17. Bioassay for DU • Fecal analysis useful for inhaled material, especially after acute accidental intake • In vivo counting useful; reasonable LLD (few mg) for lung counts • Urinalysis (KPA, ICPMS) most practical and has excellent sensitivity • Hair analysis not established technique and subject to interferences and error • Blood concentration insufficiently sensitive and may not be practical

  18. U is a heavy metal and exhibits heavy metal toxicity Low enrichment U (> ~ 15% U-235) is primarily chemically toxic Toxic effects (including death) have been clearly demonstrated in animals but not in humans – sensitivity variable among species Chemical Toxicity

  19. LD50 • Variable depending on animal species; humans seem to have lower sensitivity to U toxicity than animals • No data for humans, but limited human data and extrapolation from animals suggests that the acute LD50 for ingested or inhaled U is at least several grams

  20. Hard to Believe but True: • There has never been a documented death attributable to U ingestion or inhalation in humans • BUT . . . This does not mean that DU is without toxic effects . . . • More study of DU and its possible effects in man is clearly indicated

  21. Chemotoxic Effects: Kidney • Kidney is the most sensitive organ for chemotoxic effect of DU • Histopathology and apparent mild functional changes may occur days after large acute intakes (tens to hundreds of mg) and manifest as injury to renal tubular epithelial cells • Biomarkers of tubular effects include glucosuria, enzymuria, albuminuria, and elevated blood creatinine or NPN/BUN.

  22. Chemotoxic Effects: Kidney • Threshold for renal effects from acute exposure likely ~ 2 μg U/g kidney but 3μg U/g generally accpted as of now • Effects are typically transient but are more serious and longer lasting with higher exposures • Studies of chronic occupational exposure in workers and Gulf War veterans suggests concentrations > 1μg/g kidney may produce mild tubular dysfunction (Thun et al. 1985; Squibb et al. 2005).

  23. Chemotoxic Effects • Effects on other systems -- CNS, cardiovascular, ocular, liver, immune system -- typically not observed in animal studies or in humans, but any such effects may have been overshadowed and masked by far more severe renal effects • No evidence of reproductive system dysfunction or sperm abnormalities in male Gulf War veterans, nor any evidence of excess fetal abnormalities or mortality. Placental transfer equivocal

  24. Chemical Genotoxicity • Has not been seen (or even looked for) in animal studies • A 10 y followup study of Gulf War veterans classified as ‘high exposure’ based on urine biomarkers was equivocal (McDiarmid et al. 2004) • Recent in vitro studies with Chinese hamster cells suggests chromosome breakage and mutagenicity associated with heavy metals including U (Stearns et al 2005) but such studies have not been confirmed nor are they necessarily applicable to human exposures

  25. Radiation from DU • All three U isotopes in DU are alpha emitters (plus associated photons) • Specific activity of DU = 14.9 kBq g-1 (4.1 x 10-7 Ci g-1 ) • Decay chain products emit betas, photons • Surface dose rate from infinite slab of DU is 2.55 mGy h-1, 90% from beta and 10% from photons

  26. External Exposure Considerations • Potential for significant external exposure is small to zero • Dose rate 10 cm from an infinite slab of DU is only ~ 0.1 mGy h-1 • Unless DU is in contact with the skin (or very nearly so) it is virtually impossible to get a dose sufficient to produce any deterministic effect

  27. Internal Exposure Considerations • Risk of deterministic effects from radiation virtually zero as chemotoxicity effects would be overwhelming and possibly fatal irrespective of route of entry • Ditto for carcinogenic risks from ingestion of soluble DU; ingestion of 1 g of soluble DU produces a total stochastic risk of 3.3 x 10-5 including both carcinogenesis and genetic effects.

  28. Risk from Inhaled DU • Inhalation of soluble DU compounds dose not pose significant stochastic or deterministic risk from radiation: the chemical effects are overwhelming • Inhalation ofinsoluble aerosols may pose significant stochastic risk – e.g. inhalation of 1 mg of a 1 μm AMAD Class S aerosol produces a lifetime stochastic risk of 5.6 x 10-6 primarily from lung cancer • Lung cancer risk may be potentiated or increased by other insults such as smoking

  29. Epidemiology • Numerous radioepidemiologic studies have been done over the past three decades of uranium miners, millers, and workers and of populations exposed to high background levels of U • DU studies are under way in military and civilian populations in areas where DU munitions were used

  30. EpidemiologicFindings • Results are at most equivocal and certainly comforting – no study has shown a statistically significant excess for total cancer (so if there are in fact effects they will be minimal) • No study has shown long term kidney or other somatic effects associated with acute or chronic exposure to uranium

More Related