1 / 13

Classification of Protein Localization Patterns in 3-D

Classification of Protein Localization Patterns in 3-D. Meel Velliste Carnegie Mellon University. Introduction. Need a Systematics for Protein Localization Need Microscope Automation Feature based classification of Localization Patterns Pioneering work done with 2D images

kalei
Download Presentation

Classification of Protein Localization Patterns in 3-D

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Classification of Protein Localization Patterns in 3-D Meel Velliste Carnegie Mellon University

  2. Introduction • Need a Systematics for Protein Localization • Need Microscope Automation • Feature based classification of Localization Patterns • Pioneering work done with 2D images • Now exploring classification of 3D images

  3. Ten Major Classes of Protein Localization

  4. Features • Derive Numeric Features based on: • Morphology • Texture • Moments feature1 feature2 ... featureN Image1 0.3489 0.1294 ... 1.9012 Image2 0.4985 0.4823 ... 1.8390 ... ... ImageM 1.8245 0.8290 ... 0.9018

  5. Classification • Tried: • Classification Trees • kNN • BPNN • BPNN was the most successful with 84% correct classification rate This is a cyto-skeletal protein

  6. Results of 2-D Classification Overall accuracy = 84%

  7. Motivation for 3-D Classification • Cells are 3-dimensional objects • 2-D images take a slice through the cell • Resultant images are largely dependent on the z-position of the slice • Losing a lot of 3-D structural information

  8. The Approach • Acquire a set of 3-D images for the same 10 classes as used in the 2-D work (have 5 now) • Calculate equivalent features to what was used with the 2-D images • Compare performance

  9. 3-D Classification • Used a subset of the same Morphological features as used with 2-D patterns: • Number of Objects • Euler Number • Average Object Size • Standard Deviation of Object sizes • Ratio of the Largest to the Smallest Object Size • Average Distance of Objects from COF • Standard Deviation of Object Distances from COF • Ratio of the Largest to Smallest Object Distance

  10. 3-D Classification Results Overall accuracy = 84% (95% with GPP=Giantin)

  11. 2-D Results — Same 8 Features Overall accuracy = 84% (95% with GPP=Giantin)

  12. Conclusion • Further work needed to determine if there is any advantage to using 3D images over 2D images • Need to design new features to take advantage of extra information in 3D images

  13. Acknowledgements • Elizabeth Wu - acquired the 3-D image set • Michael V. Boland & Robert F. Murphy - pioneering work on 2-D images

More Related