1 / 25

Evaluation Results of OP4L Learning Environment and Services in Slovenia

Evaluation Results of OP4L Learning Environment and Services in Slovenia. Maribor, May 2012. Ines Kožuh, prof. dr. Matjaž Debevc. Bar, Montenegro, 25 th – 26 th June. Research detailes. Company LOGO.

kalei
Download Presentation

Evaluation Results of OP4L Learning Environment and Services in Slovenia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation Results of OP4L Learning Environment and Services in Slovenia Maribor, May 2012 Ines Kožuh, prof. dr. Matjaž Debevc Bar, Montenegro, 25th – 26th June

  2. Research detailes Company LOGO • The aim of our study: test OP4L learning environment and its services, assess students‘ relationship with collaborative learning • evaluation: • before testing OP4L learning environment • after testing OP4L learning environment

  3. Participants Company LOGO • Computer Science students -1st year (Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science), • volunteers signed consent form, • 62 participants • all male, • age in years (Mdn = 20, Mean = 20.73, Min = 19, Max = 25), • experience in programming.

  4. Participants Company LOGO • experience in programming (5 levels)

  5. Procedure Company LOGO • Three weeks in May 2012 • Two classroom meetings: • 1st meeting: before testing, instructions were given, questionnaires were filled in, • 2nd meeting: after testing, questionnaires were filled in, • The task: • brainstorming, • submission of proposed idea, • programming, • submission of the program, • assessment of the program.

  6. Measures Company LOGO • Quantitative research metod (questionnaires), • Evaluation before testing OP4L: • A questionnaire on the habits of using Facebook, Facebook chat and Web resources, • Evaluation after testing OP4L: • A questionnaire on the habits of using Facebook, Facebook chat and Web resources (the same as before testing), • A questionnaire on the experience in OP4L learning environment, • A questionnaire on collaborative learning and using Facebook in favor of collaborative learning, • A questionnaire on the usability of OP4L learning environment (SUS), • Motivated strategies on learning questionnaire (MSLQ).

  7. Measures Company LOGO • Likert-type questions and open-ended questions • questionnaires were put online.

  8. Statistical analysis Company LOGO • Descriptive statistics, • definition of statistically significant relationships (Spearman‘sRho coefficient), • Kruskal-Wallis Test (differences among independent samples), • SPSS 20.0.

  9. ResultsHabitsof using Facebook,chat and Web resources Company LOGO • Comparison of the results before and after the study

  10. ResultsHabitsof using Facebook,chat and Web resources Company LOGO 52 8 2

  11. ResultsHabits of using Facebook,chat and Web resources Company LOGO 32 18 10 2

  12. ResultsExperience in OP4L learning environment • Assessment of OP4L services: • Recommended peers (idea vs. usage) • Recommended readings (idea vs. usage) • idea – from pedagogical and functional point of view • usage – from pedagogical and functional point of view, technical operation

  13. Results Experience in OP4L learning environment Company LOGO 3.8347 3.7806 3.3742 3.2231

  14. Results Usability of OP4L learning environment (SUS) Company LOGO • SUS score = 67.38 Source: A. Bangor, P. Kortum, J.A. Miller, The System Usability Scale (SUS): An Empirical Evaluation, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24, (2008), 6, pp. 574‒594.

  15. ResultsOpinions on usability of OP4L learning environment Company LOGO • Bad responsiveness of the system. • Too many clicks were needed to be able to come to the task. • Problems with submitting and assessing the tasks. • Communication with others was too complicated.

  16. Results Correlations between usability and OP4L services Company LOGO **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

  17. ResultsCollaborative learning and using FB in learning Company LOGO • assessment of collaborative learning, • assessment of using Facebook in learning,

  18. Results Correlations among three variables Company LOGO **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

  19. Results Dispersion of data for two variables Company LOGO

  20. ResultsDifferencesamonggroups in knowledgeofprogramming Company LOGO

  21. ResultsMSLQ – Motivational strategies Company LOGO N = 58 students

  22. ResultsMSLQ – Motivational strategies Company LOGO N = 58 students

  23. ResultsMSLQ – Learning strategies Company LOGO N = 58 students

  24. ResultsMSLQ – Learning strategies Company LOGO N = 58 students

  25. Contact Company LOGO University of Maribor, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Smetanova 17, 2000 Maribor www.feri.uni-mb.si Ines Kožuh e-mail: ines.kozuh@uni-mb.si prof. dr. Matjaž Debevc e-mail: matjaz.debevc@uni-mb.si

More Related