1 / 12

Review of the evaluation methods for OP4L project

Review of the evaluation methods for OP4L project. Ines Kožuh prof. dr. Matjaž Debevc. Project meeting OP4L, Salzburg 5.-6. December 2011. Why evaluation?. Summative evaluation product evaluation, quantitive, numeric scores. Formative evaluation more complex, „test run“.

alaqua
Download Presentation

Review of the evaluation methods for OP4L project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reviewoftheevaluationmethodsfor OP4L project Ines Kožuh prof. dr. Matjaž Debevc Project meeting OP4L, Salzburg 5.-6. December 2011

  2. Why evaluation? • Summative evaluation • product evaluation, • quantitive, • numeric scores. • Formative evaluation • more complex, • „test run“.

  3. What will we evaluate?

  4. OP4L learning environment

  5. How will we evaluate?

  6. Evaluation methods

  7. SUMI – Software Usability Measurement Inventory • measuring usability, • mentioned in the ISO 9241 standard as a recognised method of testing user satisfaction, • 50 statements to which the users have to reply that they either Agree, Don't know, or Disagree, • 3 minutes to fill out the questionnaire, • at least 12 users.

  8. SUMI – Software Usability Measurement Inventory

  9. An example of SUMI results

  10. Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) • 81-item instrument, 7-pointLikert Scale, • 6 motivation scales • (31 items measuring value, expectancy, and affective component), • 9 learning strategies • (50 items measuring cognitive and metacognitive strategies, and resource management strategies).

  11. Evaluation • Evaluation will take place in Belgrade, Maribor and Skopje. • In Belgrade already started - first impressions?

  12. Contact University of Maribor, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Smetanova 17, 2000 Maribor www.feri.uni-mb.si Ines Kožuh e-mail: ines.kozuh@uni-mb.si prof. dr. Matjaž Debevc e-mail: matjaz.debevc@uni-mb.si

More Related