1 / 43

Luminosity Optimisation Overview

Luminosity Optimisation Overview. Philip Burrows (QMUL) Introduction Tools Active component stabilisation Beam-based feedback Beam parameter diagnostics Summary. IP. 1. Introduction. Relative component displacement -> emittance blowup (linac, BDS) mis-steering (FF), esp. final quads

kalin
Download Presentation

Luminosity Optimisation Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Luminosity Optimisation Overview • Philip Burrows • (QMUL) • Introduction • Tools • Active component stabilisation • Beam-based feedback • Beam parameter diagnostics • Summary Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  2. IP 1. Introduction • Relative component displacement -> • emittance blowup (linac, BDS) • mis-steering (FF), esp. final quads • ‘static’ effects: • misalignments … • diffusive effects: • settling, hydrology … • ‘seismic’ motion: • earthquakes, ocean waves … • cultural/facilities noise: • traffic, pumps, water flow… • slow drifts: • temperature, pressure … Luminosity vs. beam offset 50nm: ~ 80% lost Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  3. Available solutions • Optimise site choice + civil/mech. engineering: • minimise (relative) component motion • Active component stabilisation: • compensate via (inertial/optical) feedback • Beam-based feedback/scans: • move beam(s) position/angle via feedback • Integrated system: • some/all of the above working in harmony Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  4. Issues for machine-detector Interface • Stabilisation of final doublets • Intra-train and pulse-pulse beam feedback • Beam parameter diagnostics • Terse summary/overview: hopefully raise issues for discussion Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  5. 2. Tools • Ground motion data/models • Facilities noise models • Linac -> IP beam transport • PLACET+MERLIN • DIMAD+LIAR • integrated Matlab environment: MatMERLIN, MatLIAR • Beam-beam interaction: luminosity, backgrounds • CAIN • GUINEAPIG • Materials/detector simulations: shower tracking GEANT3 -> GEANT4 • EGS Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  6. Site studies + ground motion CDR/TDR: more studies to bound problem? studies of specific sites? (Seryi) Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  7. Facilities Noise Not difficult to find noisy environments! Example: noise at SLD TDR: need to model for real engineered MDI design? Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  8. Engineering approach(Asiri) Select a Location (Representative Site) Good Geology and Quiet Select and Locate Near-Field (Cryo/compressors, pumps) Geotechnical Studies (Soil/Rock Classification) Attenuation Characteristics of Soil/Rock Estimate Near-Field Excitation (At Their Footings) Far-Field Excitation (Ambient Ground Motion Measurement) Estimate Vibration @ Invert of Beam Housing ( Response to Near and Far Fields Sources) Done O(1) for few sites Revisit for cold ILC Reestablish for cold ILC Acceptance Criteria Yes Adopt as a Concept Design Requirement No Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  9. 2. Tools • Ground motion data/models • Facilities noise models • Linac -> IP beam transport • PLACET+MERLIN • DIMAD+LIAR • integrated Matlab environment: MatMERLIN, MatLIAR • Beam-beam interaction: luminosity, backgrounds • CAIN • GUINEAPIG • Materials/detector simulations: shower tracking GEANT3 -> GEANT4 • EGS Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  10. Codes Database Pagehttp://hepwww.ph.qmul.ac.uk/~white/accodes/codedeb.htm Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  11. Example: GUINEA PIG Pagehttp://hepwww.ph.qmul.ac.uk/~white/accodes/guinea.htm Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  12. QMUL High Throughput Cluster (HTC) • 174 x 2 GHz cpus • 40 TB attached storage • GBit ethernet • Peak capacity: • 50k cpu-hours/week • 400k cpu-hours used for • LC simulations (9 mos.) • Another 2-300 ‘boxes’ • by Spring 06 Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  13. Linac to IP Simulation Results Repositoryhttp://hepwww.ph.qmul.ac.uk/lcdata/ Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  14. Output files Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  15. IP 3. Final quadrupole stabilisation • Passive: • ‘cushioned’ magnet supports • support tube connecting opposite sides of IR • Active: • inertial stabilisation • optical anchoring schemes • NB: details linked to final doublet technology (Parker et al), crossing angle … Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  16. Final doublet stabilisation: inertial(SLAC, CERN/CLIC …) SLAC: mockup of final quad girder: Non-magnetic inertial sensor CERN: stabilisation of CLIC quad: Sub-nm achieved > few Hz Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  17. Final doublet stabilisation: optical(UBC, SLAC, CERN, KEK …) Optical anchor concept 10kg mass: 90 -> 5 nm (ground) 4.5 -> 1.5 nm (isolated) UBC prototype Optical anchor system in development: NanoBPM project (ATF) Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  18. ‘Nano’ Project at KEK ATF System test: aim for optical-anchor stabilisation of pair of BPM triplets at nm level, with intra-train beam FB/FF Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  19. Possible ATF optical anchor scheme (Oxford):simulations in progress Urner Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  20. 4. Beam-based feedback • ‘slow’ upstream orbit feedbacks • IP pulse-pulse feedback (5 Hz) • IP intra-train (bunch-bunch) feedback: 3 MHz • Position and angle corrections: • most critical in vertical dimension Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  21. Beam-beam deflection GUINEAPIG simulations (White) Deflection curve depends on: Q, sigma-x, sigma-y, sigma-z … Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  22. Intra-train Beam-based Feedback Concept(same hardware for pulse-pulse FB) • Intra-train beam feedback is last line of defence against relative beam misalignment • Key components: • Beam position monitor (BPM) • Signal processor • Fast driver amplifier • E.M. kicker • Fast FB circuit TESLA TDR: principal IR beam-misalignment correction Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  23. Zero-degree crossing angle (TESLA TDR) FB BPM Upstream kicker(s) Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  24. ‘Large’ crossing angle (NLC) kicker FB BPM Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  25. Angle feedback: upstream in BDS Place kicker at point with IP phase. BPM at phase 90 degree downstream from kicker. Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  26. Angle feedback: locally near IP – crab cavity(IR with crossing angle) • Fast phase adjust • using a second klystron • and fast phase • difference. Needs careful integration into MDI design! Diagram by J. Frisch Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  27. IP Feedback model Linearise Beam-Beam Kick Curve Response Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  28. Feedback Algorithm • Proportional-Integral (PI) Controller: • Subtract uPI(k-1) to get recursive algorithm: • 2 free parameters: gains KP and KI : • KP provides fast response to error signal. • KI cancels steady-state error. • Iterate simulation to obtain optimum parameters to give fast correction and maintain collisions at 0.1sy level. Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  29. Illustration of Intra-train feedback performance (White/QMUL) (TESLA TDR) OPTIMAL LUMINOSITY y angle scan Excellent starting point: need to add further ‘reality’ … y position scan: optimise signal in pair monitor (+4%) y position FB: restore collisions within 100 bunches 1 seed: post-BBA + GM + wakes Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  30. Intra-train beam feedback prototypes and beam tests (QMUL, Oxford, DL, SLAC, KEK …) • FONT1 and FONT2 prototype intra-train FB • systems tested with beam at SLAC/NLCTA. FONT3/FEATHER beam tests at KEK/ATF summer 2005: micron-level stability of 1.3 GeV ATF beam (model of nm- level stability of ILC beam) Cold ILC: robustness, algorithmic control Full delay-loop feedback on: Latency 53ns Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  31. Continuing feedback hardware development • Short-term: FONT3 at ATF: aim for micron-level stability of 1 GeV beam • Long-term: • demonstrate robust intra-train FB system for ILC, based on digital signal processing, and ideally test with beam: • requires long bunchtrain with 337 ns bunch spacing • 2005-6: 3 (or 4) bunches x 100 ns at ATF would allow first tests: • stabilise last bunch at 100 nm level as part of Nano project • also feed-forward studies ring -> extraction line? > 2006: 20 bunches x 337ns at ATF/ATF2 would allow FB algorithm development Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  32. Backgrounds (QMUL) Feedback system incorporated into GEANT IR model Need to ensure: FB system performance OK, FB material does not cause additional backgrounds in detector. Considering experimental background tests at SLAC/ESA Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  33. Pulse-pulse IP beam deflection feedback(Hendricksen) Input GM models A, B, C: Linac->IP tracking + 5 Hz FB (TESLA) <Luminosity> Need for intra-train FB Need to integrate simulation of FBs: upstream slow, active stabilisation, 5Hz, intra-train … Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  34. SLC optimised ‘dither’ feedback at IP(Phinney) Deflection scans: 5 knobs/beam : x/y waist, x/y dispersion, coupling Old method: scan of beam size vs. single knob: New method: optimise lumi w. dither FB on each knob Poor resolution, lumi loss Increased lumi, eased ops. Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  35. 5. IP beam parameter diagnostics • Sigma x • Sigma y • Sigma z • Sigma x' • Sigma y' • x offset • y offset • x' offset • y' offset • x-waist shift • y-waist shift • Bunch rotation • N particles/bunch • Banana shape • … … • Luminosity What do you want to know?! Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  36. Available diagnostics • Transverse emittance: sigma x, sigma y, sigma x’, sigma y’ • laserwire etc. beam size monitors (probably upstream) • Bunch length: sigma z • electro-optic, ODR, Smith-Purcell etc. monitors • Bunch charge: • toroids • Beam position/angle offsets: • beam-beam deflections • Luminosity • Pair/beamstrahlung monitors Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  37. Beam diagnostics possibilities in IR limited Lumi mon. (Bhabhas) Forward BSR mon. IP BPM (beam deflections) Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  38. Beam parameters from beamstrahlung?(Stahl, White) Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  39. Observables/BeamParams List • Sigma x • Sigma y • Sigma z • Sigma x' • Sigma y' • E • E spread • x Offset • x' offset • y offset • y'' offset • x-waist shift • y-waist shift • Bunch rotation • N particles/bunch • Amount of y+y’ type-1 banana • Amount of y+y’ type-2 banana • Amount of y+y’ type-3 banana • E_tot • r moment • 1/r moment • Thrust Direction • Thrust Value • Angular Spread • E_out/E_in • L-R Asymmetry • T-B Asymmetry • Diagonal Asymmetry • N/E_tot • Forward + backward • calorimeters Each variable where appropriate exists for the mean of e- + e+ bunch and difference in obs/par between them. Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  40. Parameter Reconstruction • Compute Taylor matrices through multiple GP runs varying beam params-> use Grid computing at QM to do in finite time (have to stick to 2nd order calculations realistically). • For parameter reconstruction: Solve x for given f(x) using multi-parameter fit. Prob. no unique solution- choice of fit technique likely to be important. Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  41. Single-parameter analysis: sanity check Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  42. Initial results (Gaussian beams) (Stahl) Seems to be promising; MUCH more study needed … Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

  43. Summary of collision optimisation/MDI issues • Active position stabilisation of final quads? • -> properly engineered design incl. laser tubes etc. • (through detector) • IP beam deflection feedback essential: intra-train and 5Hz • -> FB BPM, kicker, cables … need integrating into MDI design • -> understand background environment better • Crab cavity could be used for angle feedback? • -> needs integrating into real MDI design • Fast bunch-by-bunch lumi measurement vital input to FB • -> develop realistic prototypes of fast BSR/pair monitor • BSR/pair monitor offers potential for beam parameter determination • -> more simulation work needed • Need to develop integrated FB + scanning strategy: • -> intra-train + 5 Hz + dither + upstream slow + feedforward … Philip Burrows MDI Workshop, SLAC 6-8/01/05

More Related