360 likes | 757 Views
Morphometric and Osteological Methods in Ichthyology. Brian Sidlauskas National Evolutionary Synthesis Center Durham, NC bls16@duke.edu. Three main types of morphological study. Study of discrete character variation among species Phylogenetics Species delimitation
E N D
Morphometric and Osteological Methods in Ichthyology Brian Sidlauskas National Evolutionary Synthesis Center Durham, NC bls16@duke.edu
Three main types of morphological study • Study of discrete character variation among species • Phylogenetics • Species delimitation • Quantification of shape and size variation • Species delimitation • Age and growth studies • Studies of character evolution • Phylogenetic comparative methods
Phylogeny Reconstruction Laemolyta taeniata Systematics of Anostomidae (Characiformes) Sidlauskas and Vari 2008, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
Anostomidae & Chilodontidae (~140 spp.) High Morphological Diversity Image credits: B. Chernoff, T. Clark, J. Gery, M. Sabaj, B. Sidlauskas
Leporinus cf. ecuadorensis Anatomical differences reveal evolutionary patterns Fifth upper pharyngeal tooth plate Schizodon fasciatus Rhytiodus argenteofuscus
Leporinus mormyrops Leporinus fasciatus Illustrations by Tamara Clark
123 morphological characters variable among ingroup or informative as to anostomid monophyly Additional 35 informative among outgroups 29 multistate, all unordered strict consensus of 1312 trees CI = 0.425 RI = 0.805 Parsimony From Sidlauskas and Vari, 2008
Leporellus most basal • Leporinus paraphyletic (and difficult to resolve with morphology) • Hypomasticus (in Leporinus) monophyletic • Abramites within Leporinus • Rhytiodus with Schizodon • Laemolyta monophyletic and sister to Anostominae sensu Winterbottom (1980) • Anostominae very strongly supported • Monophyly of Pseudanos uncertain • Anostomus paraphyletic • New genus Petulanos Parsimony From Sidlauskas and Vari, 2008
1 2 3 4 4 5 6 7 8
Consensus Phylogeny from Supermatrix Analysis ANOSTOMOIDEA Synthesis of 463 morphological characters from 14 studies 171 Species Analyzed using Parsimony Ratchet via PaupRat (Sikes and Lewis, 2001) and PRAP (Müller 2004) CURIMATOIDEA From Sidlauskas, in press, Evolution
Species Discovery and Delineation B A From Sidlauskas et al. 2005, Copeia
Schizodon scotorhabdotus new species Schizodon isognathus Schizodon knerii From Sidlauskas et al. Copeia 2007
Leporinus sp. nov. 1? (Brazil, Southern Amazon tributaries) Leporinus sp. Nov. 2? (Suriname) Leporinus cylindriformis, holotype (Brazil, Main Amazon channel)
Traditional and Geometric Techniques Often Yield Complementary Answers Traditional Linear Morphometrics Geometric Morphometrics
PCA for comparing individuals and testing group membership CVA for recognizing difference between known groups From Sidlauskas, Vari and Mol, in prep
Highland fishes measurably more streamlined than lowland fishes • Differing allometric trajectories • Consistent with induction by growth in fast water Sidlauskas, Chernoff and Machado-Allison 2006, Ichthyological Research
Measuring Morphological Diversity Curimatidae Curimatella alburna • 21 skull landmarks • 171 species, ca. 1200 specimens • Analyzed with geometric morphometrics From Sidlauskas, 2007, Evolution
Phylomorphospaces • Relative Warp Analysis of skull shapes yields positions of species in morphospace • Phylogeny links species • Squared-change parsimony or likelihood infers position of internal nodes and morphometric distances (Euclidean) between them. • Species sorted into diet classes based on literature accounts (Herbivore, Invertivore, Detritivore, etc.) and color coded • Reconstruction of diet at internal nodes Relative Warp 2 Relative Warp 1 Sidlauskas, in press, Evolution
Plotting phylogenies into a morphospace Sidlauskas in press, Evolution
Significance Testing via Simulation • Simulate morphological evolution • Many possible phylogenies • constant tempo and mode (e.g. single rate Brownian motion) • Reconstruct distribution of possible phylomorphospaces • Determine how often one generates two clades that differ as greatly as the observed • If A/Cobserved > A/C simulated 95% of the time, then reject the null hypothesis of equal tempo or mode • Otherwise, real world consistent with two random outcomes of the same process Unequal tempo?: P from 0.29 to 0.65 Unequal modes?: P from 0.01 to 0.05