240 likes | 366 Views
Graduate Enrollment Planning Update March 2006. 2000 2005 Change MS 647 910 40.6% PhD 281 377 34.2% Total 928 1287 38.7% Campus 718 851 18.5% Distance 210 438 108% Total 928 1289 38.7%. Graduate Enrollment Trends. 2005 Graduate Student Composition. Total Graduate Percentage
E N D
20002005Change MS 647 910 40.6% PhD 281 377 34.2% Total 928 1287 38.7% Campus 718 851 18.5% Distance 210 438 108% Total 928 1289 38.7% Graduate Enrollment Trends
2005 Graduate Student Composition Total GraduatePercentage Domestic Distance 2.5% Domestic On-campus 35.1% International On-campus 62.4% Masters Domestic Distance 3.3% Domestic On-campus 37.7% International On-campus 59% Doctoral Domestic Distance 0.9% Domestic On-campus 29.9% International On-campus 69.2%
2004 Strategic Planning:Graduate Student Enrollment Survey of Departments 1. How many total graduate students can your department support with existing academic resources (personnel and operations) and what are your current goals? # of Students 2004-05 Goal # MS (Thesis) MS (Non-thesis) Ph.D. Total 2. How many and what percentage of UMR UG graduates would you prefer to have in your graduate program? # % No preference (X) MS (Thesis) MS (Non-thesis) Ph.D. Total 3. What are the top 10 universities from which you would prefer to attract graduate students? 4. What is your desired ratio for international:U.S. domestic graduate students? International:USA MS (Thesis) MS (Non-thesis) Ph.D. Total 5. What is your desired ratio for on-campus:off-campus graduate students? On-Campus (Rolla) : Off-Campus (including online) MS (Thesis) MS (Non-thesis) Ph.D. Total
Graduate Student Capacity with Current Resources • MS (thesis): 436 • MS (non-thesis): 616 • PhD: 465 • TOTAL: 1517 for existing programs • NEW GOAL: 1750 with new programs and expanded distance offerings • 1025 on-campus graduate students • 725 distance graduate students NOTE: This survey did not include projections/goals for the new MBA, geotechnics, biomaterials, materials science & technology, technical communication, and 19 new graduate certificates.
UMR Comparator Institutions • California Institute of Technology • Carnegie Mellon University • Colorado School of Mines • Drexel University • Georgia Institute of Technology • Illinois Institute of Technology • Massachusetts Institute of Technology • Michigan Technological University • New Jersey Institute of Technology • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute • South Dakota School of Mines • Stevens Institute of Technology • Worcester Polytechnic Institute
UMR Competitor Institutions • UM-Columbia • Washington University, St. Louis • St. Louis University • University of Illinois Champagne Urbana • University of Kansas • Kansas State University • Oklahoma State University
Top 10 Colleges/Universities for Graduate RecruitmentFrom Graduate Student Enrollment Planning SurveySpring 2004 Aerospace Engineering 1. Purdue Univ. 6. Indian Institute of Technology, India 2. Iowa State Univ. 7. Beijing Univ. of Aero & Astro, China 3. Univ. of Kansas 8. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ., China 4. SIU-Carbondale 9. USTC, China 5. Rose-Hulman Institute 10.National Institute of Technology, India Biological Sciences No Preference Ceramic Engineering - Did not rank in any order Iowa State Univ. (MSE) Truman State Univ. (chemistry, physics, biology) Univ. of Illinois (MSE) SMSU (chemistry, physics, biology) Alfred Univ. (MSE) Rutgers Univ. (MSE) Penn State Univ. (MSE) Coe College (physics, chemistry) UM-Columbia (physics, chemistry, engineering)
Colleges/Universities for Graduate Recruitment Chemistry 1. Saint Louis Univ. 6. MIT 2. UM-Columbia 7. CalTech 3. UMSL 8. Washington Univ. 4. UMKC 9. Univ. of Kansas 5. SMSU 10. Truman State Univ. Civil Engineering 1. UT-Austin 6. Kansas State Univ. 2. Purdue 7. Univ. of Kansas 3. UM-Columbia 8. Univ. Wisconsin-Madison 4. Univ. of Illinois 9. Univ. of Arkansas 5. Iowa State Univ. 10. Penn State 6. Univ. of Iowa 11. Georgia Tech
Colleges/Universities for Graduate Recruitment Computer Engineering 1. Rose-Hulman 6. Univ. of Illinois 2. Harvey Mudd College 7. Univ. of Wisconsin 3. Arkansas Tech 8. Milwaukee School of Engineering 4. Marshall Univ. 9. Gannon Univ. 5. Purdue 10. Arkansas State Electrical Engineering 1. Rose-Hulman 6. Univ. of Illinois 2. Harvey Mudd College 7. Univ. of Wisconsin 3. Arkansas Tech 8. Milwaukee School of Engineering 4. Marshall Univ. 9. Gannon Univ. 5. Purdue 10. Arkansas State
Colleges/Universities for Graduate Recruitment Computer Science 1. Univ. of Iowa 6. Grinnell College 2. Iowa State Univ. 7. Michigan Tech 3. Kansas State Univ. 8. Buena Vista Univ. 4. Univ. of Kansas 9. Harding Univ. 5. Univ. of Wisconsin 10. Truman State Univ. Engineering Management 1. Stanford 6. UM-Columbia 2. MIT 7. Purdue 3. Univ. of Illinois 8. Rose-Hulman 4. Univ. of Texas 9. USC 5. UM-Roll 10. Washington Univ.
Colleges/Universities for Graduate Recruitment Geological Engineering 1. Purdue 2. Colorado School of Mines 3. Texas A & M 4. Univ. of Texas 5. Michigan Tech Geology & Geophysics No preference; do not consider such a rating important. Information Science & Technology Small private, regional colleges; did not specify. Manufacturing Engineering 1. UM-Rolla 5. Zhejiang Univ. 2. SIU-Edwardsville 6. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 3. IIT Schools, India 7. National Taiwan Univ. 4. Tsinghua Univ. 8. National Cheng-Kung Univ.
Colleges/Universities for Graduate Recruitment Mechanical Engineering 1. Purdue 6. Indian Institute of Technology, India 2. Iowa State Univ. 7. Tsinghua Univ., China 3. Univ. of Arkansas 8. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ., China 4. SIU-Carbondale 9. USTC, China 5. Rose-Hulman 10. National Institute of Technology, India Metallurgical Engineering 1. Colorado School of Mines 6. Michigan Tech 2. Univ. of Texas-El Paso 7. Indian Institute of Technology, India 3. Montana Tech 8. Any Big 10 University 4. New Mexico Tech 9. Any Big 12 University 5. South Dakota School of Mines Mining Engineering No preference. Petroleum Engineering No preference. Physics Only get students from small Midwestern schools; Fort Hays State has been good. Systems Engineering Did not specify colleges/universities, but companies.
Graduate Studies Info Needs 1. What are the numbers of GRAs (domestic/international) in each department? 2. What are the numbers of GTAs (domestic/international) in each department? 3. What budgeted G.O. Dollars go to support GTAs? 4. What budgeted G.O. Dollars go to support GRAs? 5. How does UMR compare with regional competitor institutions in support with GTAs, GRAs, Fellowship dollars? 6. How does UMR compare with comparator institutions in support with GTAs, GRAs, Fellowship dollars? 7. Can UMR be competitive if it paid a graduate student fee waiver and reduced the student stipend so the student wouldn’t be taxed by the IRS? We’ve debated this in the past. I suspect it’s time to revisit this. 8. What is the number of graduate students that UMR would (could) need to attract, pay their fee waiver and increase overall revenue? What is the break-even point? 9. What is a suitable target for non-thesis masters students in each department given the current negative campus attitude about non-thesis masters?
UMR PhD Graduation History 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 A&S 24 8 16 17 20 12 18 10 16 9 17 11 Domestic 24 4 9 10 14 3 10 6 2 2 2 5 International 0 4 7 7 6 9 8 4 14 7 15 6 SOMEER 6 15 15 12 11 9 13 9 6 11 13 14 Domestic 6 10 5 6 4 5 4 3 5 7 6 8 International 0 5 10 6 7 4 9 6 1 4 7 8 SOE 36 37 34 30 30 23 15 23 23 31 31 41 Domestic 36 17 12 14 11 14 3 4 4 12 8 5 International 0 20 22 16 19 9 12 19 19 19 23 36 Total 66 60 65 59 61 44 46 42 45 51 61 66
UMR Masters Degree Graduation History 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 A&S 67 57 55 49 51 41 58 45 37 37 50 59 Domestic 67 39 30 28 19 22 20 19 13 16 18 27 International 0 18 25 21 32 19 38 26 24 21 32 32 SOMEER 26 30 30 21 23 21 35 43 43 47 65 56 Domestic 26 21 22 17 16 16 28 37 31 37 47 51 International 0 9 8 4 7 5 7 6 12 10 18 5 SOE 212 233 219 262 264 229 224 278 286 327 381 310 Domestic 212 172 188 215 208 179 156 201 199 207 214 206 International 0 61 31 47 56 50 68 77 87 120 167 104 SMIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 15 Domestic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 9 International 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 Total 305 320 304 332 338 291 317 366 366 414 502 440
Graduate Stipends for UMR Comparator/Competitor Institutions UniversityInst HealthEngr StipendSci StipendEngr StipendSci StipendTuition & Fees TA TA RA RA Remitted/GA Carnegie Mellon Uni (15-20 hrs) No $16,050 $19,800 $16,050 $19,800 $0 Georgia Tech (10 hrs) Yes (20%) $7,632 $10,350 $11,688 $11,688 $918 MIT (20 hrs) Yes (100%) $17,750 $0 $17,175 $14,800 $200 Texas A&M-College Stat (20-hrs) Yes $15,000 $13,500 $15,000 $0 $0 Univ IL - Urbana-Champ (20-hrs) Yes (100%) $16,717 $0 $16,717 $0 $0 University of Iowa (10- hrs) Yes (90%) $7,665 $20,500 $7,665 $20,500 $0 Cornell Univ (20-hrs) Yes (100%) $19,000 $15,000 $19,000 $15,408 $0 Univ of Kansas (20-hrs) Yes (75%) $10,045 $15,272 $9,302 $13,862 $286 Worcester Polytechnic Inst (20-hrs) - $14,400 $14,400 - - - South Dakota School of Mines - - - $17,000$17,000 $0 Drexel University - - $15,000 $15,000 - - Michigan Technological University Yes $10,252 $10,252 - - - RED=Full Year/Data Collected from TCHE 2004 Survey
What Graduate StudentsGenerate Tuition Revenue? • MS vs PhD • By Program • Campus vs Distance Education