170 likes | 909 Views
Overview. Development of AHRQ QI Using ED DataPatient Safety Indicators (PSI)Prevention Quality Indicators (PQI)AHRQ QI Development MethodologyAdapting the AHRQ QI to the EDPotential QI ED IndicatorsPatient Safety EventsAvoidable ED visitsData IssuesSummary. 2. Development of AHRQ ED QI. Purpose of this New TaskDevelop a set of quality indicators that is applicable to the emergency department settingIncorporate set into the publicly available AHRQ QI software Implement the establishe31919
E N D
1. Development of Emergency Department Quality Indicators (QI) Kathryn M. McDonald
Center for Health Policy / Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University
September 14, 2009
2. Overview Development of AHRQ QI Using ED Data
Patient Safety Indicators (PSI)
Prevention Quality Indicators (PQI)
AHRQ QI Development Methodology
Adapting the AHRQ QI to the ED
Potential QI ED Indicators
Patient Safety Events
Avoidable ED visits
Data Issues
Summary
3. Development of AHRQ ED QI Purpose of this New Task
Develop a set of quality indicators that is applicable to the emergency department setting
Incorporate set into the publicly available AHRQ QI software
Implement the established AHRQ QI measurement development process
Adapt existing AHRQ QI to ED setting
Conduct a review of new candidate indicators
4. Existing AHRQ QIs:Patient Safety Indicators (PSI) Death in low mortality DRGs
Decubitus ulcer
Failure to rescue
Foreign body left during procedure *
Iatrogenic pneumothorax *
Selected infections due to medical care *
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma
Postoperative hip fracture
Postoperative physiological and metabolic derangement
Postoperative PE or DVT
5. Patient Safety Indicators (cont.) Postoperative respiratory failure
Postoperative sepsis
Postoperative wound dehiscence *
Technical difficulty with procedure *
Transfusion reaction *
Birth trauma – injury to neonate
OB trauma – vaginal delivery with instrument (w/ and w/o 3rd degree lacerations)
OB trauma – vaginal delivery without instrument (w/ and w/o 3rd degree lacerations)
6. Existing AHRQ QIs:Prevention Quality Indicators Bacterial pneumonia
Dehydration
Urinary tract infection
Perforated appendix
Low birth weight
Angina without procedure
Congestive heart failure Hypertension
Adult asthma
COPD
Diabetes cx - short term
Diabetes cx - long term
Uncontrolled diabetes
Lower extremity amputation
7. Measure Development and Validation Process
8. Starting Point #1: Adapting the AHRQ QI Developing emergency department PSI shall involve several challenges. Conceptually patient safety issues may manifest themselves at different points in time and in different settings:
Within the ER visit, or
In an admission to the same hospital (promising area of focus) or
Outside of the ER of interest or the same hospital (e.g, home, another ER, another hospital)
Development effort might consider the relationship between the PQIs and potential PSIs in the ED context
For example, a patient that presents at the emergency department with a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and then gets admitted as an inpatient. This patient will flag as a PQI at the ED level and at the inpatient admission level.
However, another patient that presents with a UTI and then is sent home, but returns the following day and needs to be admitted might be considered a patient safety problem.
Our development effort will consider these issues and relationships to develop indicators of two types – potentially preventable ED visits, and potentially preventable patient safety events.
9. Starting Point #2: Conceptualizing Quality Issues What types of adverse events might occur during an ED admission/encounter?
Conditions worsens while waiting (related to ED crowding)
Occult GI bleeds, sepsis, hypoglycemia, atypical heart attacks
Cardiac arrest in waiting room, death of asthma patient
Air embolism from IV lines
Medication error
Wrong medication to wrong patient (e.g., with too many patients in one treatment room)
Incorrect dose (e.g. patient not weighed, transcription errors)
Medication give when patient has known allergy
Drug interaction reaction (e.g., coumadin with certain common antibiotics)
Inadequate monitoring (e.g., hypogylcemia after insulin, resp distress with narcotics)
Hemolytic reaction due to administration of incompatible blood or blood products
Falls
From Stretcher, Bed, Bathroom, Wet floor
10. Patient Safety Events What types of adverse events might occur during an ED admission/encounter or soon after?
Alarm malfunctions
Not audible to or not seen by nurses
IV Pump issues
Back up battery failures stops meds, unintentional change of settings, inadequate monitoring
Patient specimen errors
Patients not fully registered or identified when specimen leaves ED, leading to lags in results communications, or assigning results to wrong patient
Infection control failures
Incorrect diagnosis & “bounce back”
Patient returns to ED for abdominal pain (missed AAA)
X rays interpreted as negative, fracture dx on later read or when patient returns
Death in a psychiatric patient admitted to psych ward within 72 hours of ED visit (missed organic causes)
Missed injuries (Traumatic brain injury)
11. Potentially Avoidable Visits What ED encounters are potentially preventable by high quality outpatient care?
Diabetic Complications
Hyperglycemia
Infections
Asthma
Acute respiratory event
Bronchitis
Hypertension
Hypertensive urgency
Hemorrhagic stroke
Colds, Flu & Invasive Pneumococcal Disease
Poor hand hygiene
Lack of primary care
Missed Flu shot
Missed Pneumococcal Vaccine
12. Potentially Avoidable Visits What ED encounters are potentially preventable by public health interventions?
Falls
Hip Fractures, Long bone fractures, Pediatric (e.g., due to poor window guards)
Brain injury secondary (not wearing helmets)
Fireworks injuries
Dehydration
ETOH intoxication
Overdose/substance abuse
Sexually transmitted diseases
Obstetric complications
Motor vehicle collision
Drowning
Carbon monoxide poisoning (poorer quality furnaces)
Accidental hypothermia (homeless sleeping in cold)
Food poisoning (poor restaurant sanitation)
13. Potentially Avoidable Visits What ED encounters are potentially preventable with health care system changes?
Primary care provider told patient to go to ED over the phone when office practice is closed
Weekend
Night Time
Inadequate care outside ED for Aging population
Unable to provide self care, and inadequate support available
Incontinence issues
Care given due to lack of adequate insurance for non-ED care
Ingrown toe nails with infection
Vaginitis
Urethritis
Otitis Media
Running out of home oxygen
Possibly due to lack of primary care doctor
Sore throat
Urinary tract infection
14. Potentially Avoidable Visits What ED encounters are potentially preventable with improvements to post-surgical care processes?
Unable to care for self post-operatively (return visit)
Outpatient Surgery Complications
Wound dehiscence from outpatient surgery
Post op Infections
Hemorrhaging
Other post op complications
15. Data Source & Issues State Emergency Department Datasets (SEDD)
Treat and release encounters from 27 states
Encounters resulting in subsequent admission to the same hospital from 41 states
How do records for the subsequent admissions relate to corresponding hospitalization records in the SID datasets?
Diagnosis and Procedure Codes
May be that ED diagnosis codes are dropped or incorporated into a longer list when the patient is admitted
May be no effective method to evaluate the quality of ED care for patients who were hospitalized from the ED
These issues will be evaluated in detail
16. Summary: Project Philosophy Emergency medicine is particularly sensitive to guidelines and quality measures from other specialties (e.g., cardiology, infectious disease, pediatrics).
The EM community is not always included in guideline and quality measure development at the initial stages, even though they are affected most.
Therefore, a focus on ED quality needs to starts with the EM community (doctors, nurses, department managers).
Use existing data sources available from AHRQ
Therefore, this project’s indicators will not cover all important ED quality concern (e.g., ambulance diversions from overcrowding)
Start with existing AHRQ measures and development approaches
17. Acknowledgments Funded by AHRQ
Support for Quality Indicators II (Contract No. 290-04-0020)
Mamatha Pancholi, AHRQ Project Officer
Jeffrey Geppert, Project Director, Battelle Memorial Institute Sciences
Data used for analyses:
State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD), 2002-2006. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality