50 likes | 79 Views
Costing and Cost Effective Analysis. Group I. Project E. Number of people benefited – 500,000 Cost Benefit Ratio - 100 DALY’s averted – 10,000 Politically Appealing . Project D. Number of people benefited - 20 Cost Benefit Ratio - 4000 DALY’s averted – 1000
E N D
Project E • Number of people benefited – 500,000 • Cost Benefit Ratio - 100 • DALY’s averted – 10,000 • Politically Appealing
Project D • Number of people benefited - 20 • Cost Benefit Ratio - 4000 • DALY’s averted – 1000 • Focused and importance given to special focused groups • Second cost benefit ratio
Project A • Number of people benefited – 100,000 • Cost Benefit Ratio - 5000 • DALY’s averted - 1000 • Emphasis on Primary Health Care • Community Appealing
Conclusions Appropriate selection of the projects was due to : • 12, 000 DALY’s were averted • Allotted amount was utilized fully • Benefited 600,020 people • Project F was very cost ineffective since it averted only 40 DALYs and only 20 beneficiaries • Eliminated Project C since it spends 10 million and one only averts only 2000 DALY’s • We selected the most cost effective projects