260 likes | 382 Views
Major Barriers to Adoption. CostLack of interoperabilityPrivacy/Security concernsProduct shortfallsExaggerated benefits not realizedProprietary interests of vendors and the healthcare delivery system. Cost. Frolich et al.,Retrospective: Lessons Learned from the Santa Barbara Project and Their I
E N D
1. Health IT What went wrong, how do we avoid repeating mistakes ?
Jack Glode, MD, FACC
2. Major Barriers to Adoption Cost
Lack of interoperability
Privacy/Security concerns
Product shortfalls
Exaggerated benefits not realized
Proprietary interests of vendors and the healthcare delivery system
3. Cost Frolich et al.,Retrospective: Lessons Learned from the Santa Barbara Project and Their Implications for Health Information Exchange, Health Affairs August 2007
The Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange: What Happened, Miller, Health Affairs, August 2007. Lack of a compelling value proposition for potential investors was the main cause of the Santa Barbara Projects demise.
4. Cost Medical Groups Adoption Of Electronic Health Records And Information Systems, Gans, Health Affairs, 2005. ..would translate into about a 10 % reduction in take-home pay each year for most primary care practices ( assuming all IT costs paid by the practice)
5. Cost It Aint Necessarily So: The Electronic Health Record And The Unlikely Prospect Of Reducing Heal Care Costs, Sidorov, Health Affairs,2006. A considerable body of evidence suggests that widespread adoption of EHR increases health care costs the EHR has yet to be quantified or consistently used to reduce malpractice premiums or health care costs
6. Cost QI gains may justify incurring the short-term financial losses- and therefore justify a CHCs investment in an EHR- but only if the CHC rapidly and extensively used the EHR for QI., Robert Miller, PhD,UCSF
7. Cost Whether RHIOs represent small businesses that need viable business models, which requires the ability to generate profits as well as value for participants, or public goods that require public financing is an important unresolved issue. The State of Regional Health Information Organizations: Current Activities and Financing, Milstein, Health Affairs, 2008
8. Interoperability .opposition to portable health information is, by definition, support for proprietary health information. Think what it would be like to be in an emergency room where a doctor cant make lifesaving decisions because your health information is at a competing hospital.we have one chance to get it right, and that means making portable health information our priority-David Brailer
9. Interoperability
EHRs and community-based health information networks have been slow to develop because of a lack of interoperability standards to support electronic data exchange. Steven Redhead, CRS Report for Congress 2005
10. Interoperability The hospitals and some offices are preparing to install potentially different EHR systems, and all want us to be expert users in their systems, Steven Benton, M.D., FACC, Cardiology, 2007
Wyoming has 160 vendors selling these products, with no intention/means of becoming interoperable with competitors
11. Interoperability A key problem today in the realization of EHRs for the patients continuity of care( RUPRI report), is the inability to share patient records across disparate enterprises., Dr. William Jeffrey, Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives, 2006
12. Interoperability Health Information Exchange: Why Centralized Data Banks Wont Work, Rex Gantenbein, Ph.D.
Considerable resistance to centralized database in Wyoming, (John Snow, Final Report to the WHCC)
Provides a target for hackers
Physicians in England are rebelling against a national data warehouse, because of privacy and security concerns
Federated model addresses these concerns (in depth discussion at Dec. 1 Whio meeting)
13. Interoperability UHIN has issued an RFP for an interoperability solution for Utah
Community, patient centric, with emphasis on privacy/security and access to patient information at the point of care,
Must be able to both push information to known entities and to query the system to collect information about a single patient from multiple data sources (with appropriate authorization)
14. Interoperability Competition among hospitals for physicians is a key factor driving adoption of proprietary systems. In contrast, provider and health plan competition and adversarial relationships between providers and plans are viewed as major barriers to communitywide clinical data sharing. Hospital-Physician Portals: the Role of Competition in Driving Clinical Data Exchange, Grossman, Health Affairs,2006
15. Perceived Benefits of Medical IT Eric Poon, MD MPH, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, MA, Lecture at Patient Safety Conference, WHCC, Cheyenne, Wy., April 2006
Myth #1-If providers could just find the capital to buy the hardware and software, wed see clinical IT everywhere.
16. Benefits Debunking Myth #1
Most applications dont work terribly well off-the-shelf (yet)
Need to spend time to customize
Training and leadership can shorten recovery time
17. Benefits Poon Myth #2- Lets install the application with the best features and everyone will just love the EMR
build it and they will come
The docs are smart. Theyll figure out how to use this new toy
18. Benefits Debunking Myth #2
Changing peoples workflow is very hard
Leadership, workflow redesign
No-one can drink from a fire-hydrant
Small can be beautiful
19. Benefits Myth # 3 - Information technology will largely solve the problem of medical errors
Debunking #3
Its all about better team work, communication and rational standardization
IT can facilitate these processes
Installing IT gives you an opportunity to address previous broken processes
Every time you put a new process in place, you create opportunities for errors
20. Benefits Poon- Let the clinical process drive IT, not vice versa
Never skimp on training and support ( role for Whio?)
Leadership and vision
Relentless focus on workflow, (what will work best at the point of care ? What will be counterproductive)
21. Benefits RUPRI WHCC Report- Abandon top down approach and do assessment at local level to determine IT needs, place in clinical context
Docs need help with vendor assessment( role for WHio)
22. Benefits Coupled with a nearly 50% failure rate for EHRs, it is no wonder that many physician practices find the decision so daunting to move forward technologically, Evan Steel,CEO of SRS Software, Healthcare IT News. March 2006
Siderov- Not all reports on CPOE are positive. Its introduction in one pediatric ICU led to an increase in mortality rates that was blamed on delays and increased documentation time, compounded by policies that diminished access to life-saving therapies
AS implemented, EHRs were not associated with better quality(17 quality indicators) ambulatory care, Linder, et al., Arch Intern Med, 2007 (Brigham and Womens and Harvard School , Stanford University)
23. Privacy and Security Federal legislation for privacy and security, Bills in House and Senate were at odds, (see comments by Brailer), Dr Peel of Patient Privacy Rights Foundation says the bill doesnt have much of a chance of passage due to heavy lobbying from companies interested in data mining
GAO says HHS lacks strategy for ensuring HIT privacy 2006
24. Summary Wyoming needs a RHIO to address these issues, providing enlightened leadership, research, vendor evaluation, assisting in implementing measures to improve the healthcare delivery system as recommended in the RUPRI/WHCC report
We cannot rely on grants to sustain these efforts, public-private partnerships must be developed and a solid business case must be established
Interoperability with privacy/security assured must be a top priority
25. Summary Can we connect 160 different applications (vendor products)? System presented on Dec. 1, may be others?
IT must be placed in proper clinical context with careful design to avoid failures of the pastwe should resist exaggerated claims for the benefit of IT in and of itself
Use common sense we need patient information from all sources at the point of care as our first priority, i.e. lab and radiology reports, reliable medication lists, history of illnesses
Once interoperability is established, unlimited IT applications are possible: research, patient registries, disease management, programs to improve population health, improving the continuum of care, education
Special need for Telemedicine to improve the delivery system in rural Wyoming? (RUPRI/WHCC)