310 likes | 445 Views
Auditor of Public Accounts Update. Bill Cole, Deputy Auditor Auditor of Public Accounts May 8, 2006. Program Topics. NCAA Audits and Schedules Financial Reporting Standards Update. NCAA Audits and Schedules. FY05 – First year of new agreed-upon procedures
E N D
Auditor of Public AccountsUpdate Bill Cole, Deputy Auditor Auditor of Public AccountsMay 8, 2006
Program Topics • NCAA Audits and Schedules • Financial Reporting • Standards Update
NCAA Audits and Schedules • FY05 – First year of new agreed-upon procedures • More coordination between Athletics, Finance, Foundations, and Auditors • Schedule classification issues
NCAA Audits • Finance should work closely with Athletics on the NCAA schedule • Foundations should be contacted early to provide “on behalf of” payments • Report deadline remains at January 15
NCAA Schedule • Entrance Conference done with Financial Reporting and Athletics • Schedules need to be done more timely in order to meet deadlines • Auditors may be performing some work in advance of year end
NCAA Schedule EADA = NCAA = AETrue or False ?
NCAA Schedule Answer:False, the federally required EADA schedule should reconcile to the NCAA schedule which should reconcile to the Auxiliary Schedule as shown in the financial statements.
Other Clarifications • Overhead Recovery • direct vs. indirect allocation • Facilities & Administrative Support? • Administrative Support • scholarships • academic advising
On behalf payments Foundation Support Donations in exchange for ticket sales Cars Business use Personal use Other Clarifications
Financial Reporting • Management’s Discussion and Analysis • Securities Lending and SNAP • Statement of Cash Flows Issues • Implementation of GASB 40 • Financial Statement Auditing Issues
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) • Include better comparisons and analysis • Show variances in statement summaries • Eliminate outdated information • Have available for audit review more timely
MD&A Example One The notable changes in revenues include an increase in grants and contracts of $3.5 million and other operating revenues of $3.2 million. Both student tuition and fees and auxiliary revenues are presented net of scholarship allowances. In both categories, the amount of revenue dedicated to scholarships increased, giving the appearance of decreasing revenues. The increase in student tuition and fee scholarships was approximately $1 million while the auxiliary enterprise increase in scholarships was approximately $1.3 million.
MD&A Example Two Operating revenues increased 4.0 % for fiscal year 2005. This is due primarily to a 4.8 % increase in total tuition and fee revenues. This reflects tuition and fee rate average increases of 5.3 %. Similarly, room and board rates increased an average of 6% accounting for most of the increased auxiliary enterprise revenue. Revenue for sponsored programs increased 7.2%. The federal government continues to provide substantial amounts for research programs, but that funding increased at a lower rate than the 14.3% in the prior year.
Securities Lending and SNAP • Securities lending does not have an effect on cash flow therefore SHOULD NOT run through the Statement of Cash Flows. • Show Collateral Held for Securities Lending as a separate line item on SNA and do not include in SCF cash total.
Securities Lending and SNAP • The State Non-Arbitrage Program (SNAP) is treated as an investment and should run through the Statement of Cash Flows. • Bond proceeds should be shown as a gross amount even if it is immediately invested in SNAP.
Statement of Cash Flows Issues • Timeliness of preparation • Documentation of preparation • Reasonableness of amounts to other amounts in the statements • Expenditure matrix • Purchases of capital assets • Bond proceeds and payments
Implementation of GASB 40 • Effective for Fiscal Year 2005 • New disclosures for credit risk and interest rate risk • Compare disclosures among Universities • Footnote amounts may not agree to SNA, but should be reconciled
Financial Statement Auditing Issues • Financial statement preparation process needs to documented • Internal control • Sarbanes – Oxley • Succession planning
Financial Statement Auditing Issues • Statements and Footnotes • Clear trail from accounting system to statements • Adequate documentation available from the start of the audit • Use of the fluctuation analysis as part of the financial statement preparation process • Invested in net assets, net of related debt
Financial Statement Auditing Issues • Scheduling and Specialties • Research & Development – summer and fall • Student Financial Aid – summer and fall • Payroll and Revenue – interim work • Acquisitions and Capital Assets – specialists’ schedules
Standards Update • Impairment of Capital Assets GASB 42 • Proposed changes to SAS 60 • Proposed changes to SAS 61
Impairment of Capital Assets (GASB 42) • Effective for FY06 • Capital assets should be considered impaired if both of the following conditions exist: • The decline in service utility is large in magnitude • Event or change in circumstance is outside normal life cycle
Impairment of Capital Assets (GASB 42) • Impairment can be caused by physical damage, legal or environmental factors, technological changes, changes in manner of use and construction stoppage. • Write down the value of impaired assets to their current value • May include buildings not in use or in a lesser use
Proposed Changes to SAS 60 • Proposed changes will increase the span of the control-related matters that should be reported by an independent auditor • Material Weakness is expanded and Reportable Condition becomes Significant Deficiency • An audit adjustment is an indicator of a Material Weakness
Material Weaknesses Strong indicators of a material weakness in internal controls: • Ineffective internal control over financial reporting. • Restatement of previously issued financial statements. • Audit adjustments to current financial statements. • Ineffective internal audit function.
Material Weaknesses • Ineffective regulatory compliance function. • Identification of fraud by senior management. • Failure by management to correct a previous significant deficiency. • An ineffective control environment with various control deficiencies.
Proposed Changes to SAS 61 • Proposed changes will require auditors expand their communications with the Board of Visitors or Audit Committee • May require the use of closed sessions without management present • May require discussion of the scope of the audit in advance of the field work
New Communicated Matters • How the auditor will address risk of material misstatement • Auditor’s approach to relevant internal control • Materiality in planning and executing an audit • Use of internal audit work and how external and internal auditors work together
DOA Directive Comptroller’s Directive No. 1-06, “Financial Statement Template Preparation for Higher Education Institutions” should become available this Month.