480 likes | 622 Views
Leadership for Achievement. August 7, 2009. Building Blocks. The PDCA Instructional Process is grounded in three sets of ideas: Effective Schools Total Quality Management Malcolm Baldrige Criteria For Performance Excellence. TQM .
E N D
Leadership for Achievement August 7, 2009
Building Blocks • The PDCA Instructional Process is grounded in three sets of ideas: • Effective Schools • Total Quality Management • Malcolm Baldrige Criteria For Performance Excellence
TQM • Defined as “an operational theory of management and set of process tools for implementation.” • Do it right the first time! • Continuous Improvement Cycles (PDCA) • Don’t fix blame, fix the system!
Who’s To Blame? The college professor said: Such rawness in a student is a shame, lack of preparation in high school is to blame.
Who’s To Blame? Said the high school teacher: Good heavens!That boy’s a fool.The fault of course is with the middle school.
Who’s To Blame? The middle school teacher said: From stupidity may I be spared. They sent him in so unprepared.
Who’s To Blame? The primary teacher huffed: Kindergarten blockheads all.They call that preparation—why, it’s worse than none at all.
Who’s To Blame? The kindergarten teacher said: Such lack of training never did I see. What kind of woman must that mother be.
Who’s To Blame? The mother said: Poor helpless child. He’s not to blame. His father’s people were all the same.
Who’s To Blame? Said the father at the end of the line: I doubt the rascal’s even mine. Anonymous
“Effective Schools” Philosophy • Characteristics Of Effective Schools: • Strong instructional leadership • High expectations of student achievement for ALL students • Pervasive and broadly understood instructional focus • Safe and orderly school climate conducive to teaching and learning • Measures of pupil achievement as a basis of program evaluation
TAAS Velasco Elementary DEMOGRAPHICS: Economically Disadvantaged 80.4% African American 19.6%LEP36.5% Hispanic 59.8%Mobility 25.6% White 20.1%
TAAS Freeport Intermediate DEMOGRAPHICS: Economically Disadvantaged 62.9% African American 10.4%LEP 4.2% Hispanic 51.3%Mobility 20.2% White 37.8%
TAASBrazosport High School DEMOGRAPHICS: Economically Disadvantaged 54.1% African American 12.1%LEP6.6% Hispanic 50.2%Mobility 25.8% White 35.7%
1. Data Disaggregation 2. Timeline Development 8. Monitoring 7. Maintenance 3. Instructional Focus 4. Assessment 5. Tutorials 6. Enrichment PDCA Instructional Model
From Theory To Practice What the PDCA Cycle offers… • A proven track record for success • A step-by-step methodology for improving schools • A process built on the foundation of Effective School Characteristics • An alignment of planning, instruction, and assessment • An emphasis on the core curricula of reading, writing, and mathematics
Plan Disaggregate Data
Benefits • Gives teachers flexibility in how to teach by focusing on what to teach. • Emphasizes key skills for every student. • Allows students to retain skills in order to build higher skills.
Benefits (continued) • Aligns planning, instruction, assessment, and support toward student performance. • Removes subjectivity and replaces it with a focus on results. • Test scores validate standards instruction. • It is a proven approach that achieves results.
G O A L S S t u d e n t A c h i e v e m e n t S y s t e m P e r f o r m a n c e Random Acts Of Improvement = Programs
Aligned Acts Of Improvement In an aligned system… … improvement efforts are integrated and results-oriented
Results Does It Work?
Chicago Public SchoolsEight Step Schools Low Income Families Citywide 85% PDCA Schools 96% Cather School 2006-08 Cardenas School 2006-08 Citywide Average All Non-PDCA Schools 2006-08 Tilton School 2006-08 Finkl School 2006-08 Average for Ten Schools Before PDCA 1999-2005 Faraday School 2006-08
Highlights of SuccessMount Clemens (MI) Community Schools MEAP Results 2005 Grade 5 Social Studies
Highlights of SuccessMount Clemens (MI) Community Schools MEAP Results 2005 Mount Clemens Middle School, Grade 7
It is perfectly all right to teach students curricula over which they will not be tested, but in this day of accountability for results, it’s fool hardy to test students on curricula they have not been taught and taught to mastery...
Teaching one thing and testing another tends to discriminate against the socioeconomically poor and disadvantaged students, since they are the most dependent on the school as the source for their academic learnings. —Dr. Larry Lezotte