350 likes | 464 Views
Mechanical devices for cardiac massage: must-have or luxury? . Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai , MD Sapienza University of Rome , Italy giuseppe.biondizoccai@uniroma1.it. Learning goals. Why do we need mechanical devices for cardiac massage Which devices are available What are their pros
E N D
Mechanical devices for cardiac massage: must-have or luxury? Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, MD Sapienza University ofRome, Italy giuseppe.biondizoccai@uniroma1.it
Learninggoals • Why do weneedmechanicaldevicesforcardiac massage • Whichdevices are available • What are theirpros • What are theircons • Evidence • Case study
Learninggoals • Why do weneedmechanicaldevicesforcardiac massage • Whichdevices are available • What are theirpros • What are theircons • Evidence • Case study
The qualityofmanualchestcompressionisvariable, and when low isdeadly Abellaet al, Circulation 2005
Manualchestcompressionmayneverbedoneadequately in selectedsettings
Learninggoals • Why do weneedmechanicaldevicesforcardiac massage • Whichdevices are available • What are theirpros • What are theircons • Evidence • Case study
Learninggoals • Why do weneedmechanicaldevicesforcardiac massage • Whichdevices are available • What are theirpros • What are theircons • Evidence • Case study
Reliability and force Steenet al, Resuscitation 2002
Reliability and force Cardiacarrest LUCAS Manualcompression Agostoni et al, Int J Cardiol 2008
Compression and decompression Steenet al, Resuscitation 2002
Learninggoals • Why do weneedmechanicaldevicesforcardiac massage • Whichdevices are available • What are theirpros • What are theircons • Evidence • Case study
Trauma Larsenet al, Resuscitation 2007
Coronarypressuremaybetoo low Larsenet al, Resuscitation 2010
Defibrillationmaybedelayed Putzer et al, Am J EmergMed 2013
Learninggoals • Why do weneedmechanicaldevicesforcardiac massage • Whichdevices are available • What are theirpros • What are theircons • Evidence • Case study
Non-randomized trial Axelssonet al, Resuscitation 2006
RCT ofAutoPulse Hallstromet al, JAMA 2006
RCT ofCardioPump ACD-CPR and ITD Aufderheideet al, Lancet 2011
Learninggoals • Why do weneedmechanicaldevicesforcardiac massage • Whichdevices are available • What are theirpros • What are theircons • Evidence • Case study
Case study Age: 40 years Gender: male Comorbidities: type 1 diabetes mellitus Diagnosis: acute myocardial infarction Prehospital events/management: VF treated with DC shock, followed by PEA; manual chest compression, repeat IV adrenaline boluses, tracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation Hospital events/management: systemic thrombolysis with alteplase attempted without success; LUCAS deployment and transfer to the cath lab Biondi-Zoccaiet al, HSR Proc Intensive Care CardiovascAnesth2011
Baselinecoronaryangiography Biondi-Zoccaiet al, HSR Proc Intensive Care CardiovascAnesth2011
Predilation on leftmain-circumflex Biondi-Zoccaiet al, HSR Proc Intensive Care CardiovascAnesth2011
Leftmain-anteriordescendingstenting Biondi-Zoccaiet al, HSR Proc Intensive Care CardiovascAnesth2011
Coronaryangiographyafterstenting Biondi-Zoccaiet al, HSR Proc Intensive Care CardiovascAnesth2011
Take home message • Despiteongoingresearchforseveraldecades, manualchestcompressionremains the gold standard meanstoperformcardiac massage. • Mechanicaldeviceshaveseveraladvantages in comparisontomanualchestcompression. • High-qualityevidenceisstilllacking and a selecteduseofthesedevicesis the safestapproachuntilongoingtrials (e.g. CIRC, LINC and PARAMEDIC) are complete.
Manythanksforyourattention Fortheseslides and furtherones on similartopicsfeel free tovisit: www.metcardio.org/slides.html Foradditionaldetails or queriesfeel free tocontact me directly: giuseppe.biondizoccai@uniroma1.it