1 / 24

CARDIFF UNIVERSITY UK Cardiff School of Social Sciences

A A not A A. CARDIFF UNIVERSITY UK Cardiff School of Social Sciences. Potential modified PTE. The next PowerPoint presentation indicates some thoughts we are having about what a modified PTE might look like. The first slide indicates when we put together the first version

karan
Download Presentation

CARDIFF UNIVERSITY UK Cardiff School of Social Sciences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A A not A A CARDIFF UNIVERSITY UKCardiff School of Social Sciences

  2. Potential modified PTE The next PowerPoint presentation indicates some thoughts we are having about what a modified PTE might look like. The first slide indicates when we put together the first version That first version was discussed at SEESHOP5 and it was agreed that DSD and the SAD version of Sociological Discrimination were good things, the rest of the rearrangement did not work so well So this is here for discussion: email any comments to any of us or put them on the SEETALK list (You’ll notice a gap between Interactional and Contributory which something called Perceptual Expertise once filled but it was generally agreed that it was a mistake to try to add it)

  3. Potential modifications to PTE PowerPoint presentation preparation begun around May 2010 and completed by August 2010 at latest. It was discussed in KES on 4 June 2010

  4. DSD The first change is the addition of ‘Domain Specific Discrimination’ (DSD) DSD is a transmuted meta-expertise but is used by those in the very heart of the technical community It is the way core-set scientists judge others in order to break out of the experiment’s regress and was discovered by SSK (eg Changing Order) but not given a name until now. Martin Weinel pointed to the fact that DSD should be a named category in the PTE DSD is also the major component of Referred Expertise

  5. UBIQUITOUS EXPERTISES DISPOSITIONS SPECIALIST EXPERTISES META-CRITERIA META-EXPERTISES Interactive ability Reflective ability Based on Specialist TK Based on Ubiquitous TK Contributory expertise Interactional expertise Beer mat knowledge Popular understanding PSK Polimorphic Mimeomorphic Domain specific discrimination (DSD) External (Transmuted expertises) Internal (Non-transmuted expertises) Ubiquitous discrimin- ation Local Discrimin- ation Technical connoisseurship Referred expertise Downward discrimination DSD Track record Experience Credentials

  6. Sociological Discrimination The second change is the addition Sociological Discrimination. It includes: Martin Weinel’s rules for separated true from fake scientific controversies Lee Smolin’s attempt to criticise string theory because of its sociological pathologies Simon Cole’s use of general scientific principles – eg randomised control trials -- to criticise fingerprint identification (and all other such) Collins/Boyce, et al’s criticism of MMR journalists The label should almost certainly be changed to something more general so that this category could include the kind of thing that, for example, argumentation theorists invoke to make distinctions between expert positions. ‘Social Analytic Discrimination’ (SAD)? SAD is another transmuted meta-expertise, this time from one kind of esoteric expertise to another

  7. UBIQUITOUS EXPERTISES DISPOSITIONS SPECIALIST EXPERTISES META-CRITERIA META-EXPERTISES Interactive ability Reflective ability Based on Specialist TK Based on Ubiquitous TK Contributory expertise Interactional expertise Beer mat knowledge Popular understanding PSK Polimorphic Mimeomorphic Domain specific discrimination (DSD) External (Transmuted expertises) Internal (Non-transmuted expertises) Ubiquitous discrimin- ation Sociological discrimin- ation Local Discrimin- ation Technical connoisseurship Referred expertise Downward discrimination DSD Track record Experience Credentials

  8. Rearrangement of table The next slides show the bottom part of the table being rearranged along with some explanations The theme of the lower half of the table changes from meta-expertise vs expertise to transmuted vs non-transmuted The labels in the black boxes on the left of the lines change to reflect this changed theme. This, we believe, produces a more coherent result

  9. META-CRITERIA External (Transmuted expertises) Internal (Non-transmuted expertises) META-EXPERTISES Ubiquitous discrimin- ation Sociological discrimin- ation Local Discrimin- ation Technical connoisseurship Referred expertise Downward discrimination Track record Experience Credentials SPECIALIST EXPERTISES Based on Specialist TK Based on Ubiquitous TK Interactional expertise Contributory expertise Popular understanding Beer mat knowledge PSK Polimorphic Mimeomorphic SPECIALIST JUDGEMENTS Domain specific discrimination (DSD) DSD These two are meta-expertise because they judge people Involves judging a social situation These sometimes involve judging people and sometimes judging others products or others judgments

  10. More rearrangement Now we move some stuff about and lose the meta-expertise line

  11. META-CRITERIA External (Transmuted expertises) Internal (Non-transmuted expertises) META-EXPERTISES Ubiquitous discrimin- ation Sociological discrimin- ation Local Discrimin- ation Technical connoisseurship Referred expertise Downward discrimination Track record Experience Credentials SPECIALIST EXPERTISES Based on Specialist TK Based on Ubiquitous TK Interactional expertise Contributory expertise Popular understanding Beer mat knowledge PSK Polimorphic Mimeomorphic SPECIALIST JUDGEMENTS Domain specific discrimination (DSD)

  12. More rearrangement Re-label the Meta-criteria line etc

  13. Technical connoisseurship Referred expertise Downward discrimination SPECIALIST EXPERTISES Based on Specialist TK Based on Ubiquitous TK Interactional expertise Contributory expertise Popular understanding Beer mat knowledge PSK Polimorphic Mimeomorphic Internal (Non-transmuted expertises) SPECIALIST JUDGEMENTS Domain specific discrimination (DSD) External (Transmuted expertises) META-CRITERIA TRANSMUTEDJUDGEMENTS Ubiquitous discrimin- ation Sociological discrimin- ation Local Discrimin- ation Track record Experience Credentials

  14. More rearrangement Reinsert top two lines of table and it’s finished after a bit more clarification and a few more labels plus SAD replacing Sociological Discrimination

  15. NEW VERSION UBIQUITOUS EXPERTISES Interactive ability Reflective ability DISPOSITIONS Technical connoisseurship Referred expertise Downward discrimination SPECIALIST EXPERTISES Defining Based on Specialist TK Based on Ubiquitous TK Interactional expertise Contributory expertise Popular understanding Beer mat knowledge PSK Polimorphic Mimeomorphic Entangled SPECIALIST JUDGEMENTS Domain specific discrimination (DSD) Societal Social Analytic discrimin- ation TRANSMUTED JUDGEMENTS Ubiquitous discrimin- ation Sociological discrimin- ation Local Discrimin- ation Track record Experience Credentials

  16. OLD VERSION UBIQUITOUS EXPERTISES DISPOSITIONS SPECIALIST EXPERTISES META-CRITERIA META-EXPERTISES Interactive ability Reflective ability Based on Specialist TK Based on Ubiquitous TK Contributory expertise Interactional expertise Beer mat knowledge Popular understanding PSK Polimorphic Mimeomorphic External (Transmuted expertises) Internal (Non-transmuted expertises) Ubiquitous discrimin- ation Local Discrimin- ation Technical connoisseurship Referred expertise Downward discrimination Track record Experience Credentials

  17. END

  18. First modification

  19. Sociological Discrimination Martin Weinel’s rules for separated true from fake scientific controversies Lee Smolin’s attempt to criticise string theory because of its sociological pathologies Simon Cole’s use of general scientific principles – eg randomised control trials -- to criticise fingerprint identification (and all other such) Collins/Boyce, et al’s criticism of MMR journalists

  20. Transformations to the meta-line Involve judging a social situation These two are meta-expertise because they judge people These sometimes involve judging people and sometimes judging others products or others judgments

  21. Second modification main domain related domain Meta-credentials social domain

  22. SPECIALIST EXPERTISES Based on Specialist TK Based on Ubiquitous TK Interactional expertise Perceptual expertise Contributory expertise Popular understanding Beer mat knowledge PSK Polimorphic Mimeomorphic Domain specific discrimination (DSD) META-CRITERIA External (Transmuted expertises) Internal (Non-transmuted expertises) META-EXPERTISES Ubiquitous discrimin- ation Sociological discrimin- ation Local Discrimin- ation Technical connoisseurship Referred expertise Downward discrimination Track record Experience Credentials SPECIALIST JUDGEMENTS DSD These two are meta-expertise because they judge people Involves judging a social situation These sometimes involve judging people and sometimes judging others products or others judgments

  23. SPECIALIST EXPERTISES Based on Specialist TK Based on Ubiquitous TK Interactional expertise Perceptual expertise Contributory expertise Popular understanding Beer mat knowledge PSK Polimorphic Mimeomorphic Domain specific discrimination (DSD) META-CRITERIA External (Transmuted expertises) Internal (Non-transmuted expertises) META-EXPERTISES Ubiquitous discrimin- ation Sociological discrimin- ation Local Discrimin- ation Technical connoisseurship Referred expertise Downward discrimination Track record Experience Credentials SPECIALIST JUDGEMENTS DSD These two are meta-expertise because they judge people Involves judging a social situation These sometimes involve judging people and sometimes judging others products or others judgments

More Related