190 likes | 207 Views
Learn about the increasing attention to healthcare provider (HCP) relationships, the enforcement of licensing laws, and how to determine fair market value for contributions. Explore the implementation of a royalty review committee and best practices for compliance.
E N D
MassMEDICFebruary 26, 2010Licensing and Compliance Presenter David L. Cavanaugh 60 State StreetBoston, MA 02109 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20006
Health Care Provider (HCP) Relationship • Increasing attention to HCP Relationship with Companies • Contact Points: • Marketing • Product Development • Product Evaluation • Training • Focus on Licensing/Consulting Aspect Today WilmerHale
Objectives • Background of increased focus on HCP relationship • Apply focus to licensing • Describe recent enforcement activity regarding licensing • Review model of determining Fair Market Value for contributions • Outline implementation of Royalty Review Committee WilmerHale
HCP- Spectrum of Contributions • Fair Compensation for Contributions to • Developing • New Medical Devices Financial Inducements to use Company Products How to Determine? WilmerHale
HCP- Enforcement • Enforcement of existing laws- • 2006 - • Large medical device company agreed to pay $40M to settle allegations that it offered “kickbacks” to HCP’s • Included in “kickbacks” was consulting and royalty agreements for which little or no work was done WilmerHale
HCP- Enforcement • Enforcement of existing laws- • 2007- • Spinal cord stimulation company paid $3M to settle allegations of improper payment • Company paid $5k for each 5 new patients tested • Limited clinical benefit • The data collection fee was not set through “fair market value” assessment • The company didn’t use the data • There were also “resort” trips where much of the time was spend on recreational activities WilmerHale
HCP- Enforcement • Enforcement of Existing laws- • 2007- • Enforcement in hip and knee replacement market • Companies pursued comprise 95% of market • Settlement total of $311M • Initiate compliance programs • Ongoing review of program activities • Enforcement is real, costly, and targeted • toward abuses of the HCP/Company • relationship WilmerHale
HCP- Consulting and Licensing • Umbrella Concept- Fair market value (FMV) for contributions • We know the margins • No work consulting arrangement problem • HCP innovation (patented?) contribution not a problem • Challenge- How to navigate the middle WilmerHale
HCP- Contributions Summary of Potential Contributions • Patented Idea • Patent Pending Idea • Idea with no patent application • Early concept not yet ready for patenting • Unpatentable idea • Trade Secret • Manufacturing Suggestion • Usage evaluation • Prototype evaluation • Market needs assessment • Non specific consulting WilmerHale
Overview Compensation Framework WilmerHale • Framework • Assists with assessing intellectual property and assigning the appropriate fair market value for the contribution • Outlines the various types of intellectual property that may be addressed by RRC. • Defines a range of fair market compensation that is capped on both an individual basis and design team basis.
Overview Compensation Framework WilmerHale • Framework • Should address most of the situations that will be encountered • The fair market compensation rates should be a reasonable range
The Intellectual Property Continuum IP is Innovative IP is Contributory Consultative Information Intellectual Property (“IP”) can be valued on a broad continuum for Medical Device Companies. • Patentable Invention - where a patent application has already been filed or can be filed. Typically the most valuable form of IP. • Trade Secret or “Know how” where specific information is being purchased by the Company to either develop or enhance a product or technique. • Consultation - generally compensated on a fee-for-service basis for the time provided by the consultant Patentable Invention Trade Secret Know-How Fee-for-Service High Value Medium Value Lower Value Fair Market Compensation Range WilmerHale
Implementation of Royalty Policy • Process for implementation • Define purpose • Determine participation • Identify scope of activity • Develop charter/policy document • Adhere to determined Charter WilmerHale
Implementation of Royalty Policy • Define Purpose • Work with Compliance Officer • Be explicit • Bring others onto project • Help others to see objective WilmerHale
Implementation of Royalty Policy • Determine Participation: • Legal represented • R&D participation • CFO/Controller • Clinical and Regulatory Affairs WilmerHale
Implementation of Royalty Policy • Identify Scope of Activity • Review the HCP Consultant qualifications of design team • Establish Fair Market Value royalty percentage • Evaluate whether HCP Consultant met established criteria • Evaluate Contributions for innovation and significant WilmerHale
Implementation of Royalty Policy • Develop charter/policy document • Purpose • Responsibilities • Composition • Protocol • Evaluation • Role functions WilmerHale
Licensing and Compliance • Summary • HCP- Enforcement • Compensation Framework • Implementation of Royalty Policy WilmerHale
Wilmer Hale • Thank you • Questions? • Dave Cavanaugh • 617-526-6000 • 202-663-6025 7459399v1 WilmerHale