1 / 8

Status of progress of TDI indicator

Status of progress of TDI indicator. Notrbert Frost, Linda Montanari , EMCDDA, 22-23 September 2004 Annual E xpert Meeting on Treatment Demand Indicator. N. of countries sumbitting TDI t ables on 200 2 data. Source: EISDD. Up-date: 16/09/2004. Deadlines observance (15 September 2003).

karen-mcneil
Download Presentation

Status of progress of TDI indicator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of progress of TDI indicator Notrbert Frost, Linda Montanari, EMCDDA, 22-23 September 2004 Annual Expert Meeting on Treatment Demand Indicator

  2. N. of countries sumbitting TDI tables on 2002 data Source: EISDD Up-date: 16/09/2004

  3. Deadlines observance(15 September 2003)

  4. Data submissions in 2004 • Until yesterday evening, already 62 TDI related tables have arrived already!

  5. Coverage on 29 countries • N. Units covered: 2259 • N. units present in the coutnries: 3278 • % of coverage on known n. units: 52% • Countries who have not provided any table 8 • Countries who have not provided TDI specific 2002 data: 13

  6. Some problems…. • Little coverage • Missing information (e.g. new clients, source of referral, labour status, injection, etc.) • Different defintions/lack of harmonisation with TDI Protocol • Lack of internal consistency • Specific national problems (e.g. different period of data reporting, alcohol and drugs togehter, all treatment centres together, etc.)

  7. Quality criteria defined in the EISDD • Empty table - provided • Invalid (e.g. invalid sample, wrong definitions, etc.) • Good Stadard • Use in AR – data used for the Annual Report • Complete • To enter • Data entered • Comments

  8. Thanks for your attention!

More Related