640 likes | 656 Views
Explore the factors influencing economic growth, from investment and education to efficiency and technological progress. Compare short-term fluctuations with long-term growth strategies, highlighting the importance of economic policies and national output. Delve into the theories of economic growth—neoclassical and endogenous growth models—examining countries like Ireland and Greece. Understand the interplay between saving, efficiency, and depreciation in driving sustainable growth. Grasp the concept of "conditional convergence" and analyze diverse growth trajectories of nations worldwide. Unveil the secrets behind prosperity, from saving rates to stability and policy effectiveness.
E N D
To Grow or Not to Grow:That is the Question Thorvaldur Gylfason
Outline • Pictures of growth • Determinants of growth • Saving and investment • Efficiency • Liberalization • Stabilization • Privatization • Education • Diversification • Distribution • Empirical evidence of growth
Economic growth: The short run vs. the long run Economic growth in the long run Potential output Actual output Upswing National economic output Business cycles in the short run Downswing Time
Economic growth: The short run vs. the long run • To analyze the movements of actual output from year to year, viz., in the short run • Need short-run macroeconomic theory • Keynesian or neoclassical • To analyze the path of potential output over long periods • Need modern theory of economic growth • Neoclassical or endogenous
Growing together, growing apart West-Germany : East-Germany Austria : Czech Republic Finland : Estonia Taiwan : China South Korea : North Korea Economic system Rapid growth Botswana : Nigeria Kenya : Tanzania Thailand : Burma Tunisia : Morocco Spain : Argentina Mauritius : Madagascar National economic output Economic policy? Slow growth Time
Growing apart Case B: 2% a year • Efficiency • Economic system • Economic policy Threefold difference after 60 years Output per capita Case A: 0.4% a year 60 0 Years
Sources of growth: Investment and education + + denotes a positive effect in the direction shown +
Sources of growth: Investment and education Adam Smith knew this, and more, as did Arthur Lewis Solow raised doubts on long-run linkages + + denotes a positive effect in the direction shown +
More sources of growth Arthur Lewis: x is trade, stable politics, good weather But Solow carried the day: long-run growth is exogenous! + + + denotes a positive effect in the direction shown +
The Neoclassical Theory of Exogenous Economic Growth Traces the rate of growth of output per capita to a single source: Technological progress Hence, economic growth in the long run is immune to economic policy, good or bad “To change the rate of growth of real output per head you have to change the rate of technical progress.” ROBERT M. SOLOW
The New Theory of Endogenous Economic Growth • Traces the rate of growth of output per capita to three main sources: • Saving • Efficiency • Depreciation “The proximate causes of economic growth are the effort to economize, the accumulation of knowledge, and the accumulation of capital.” W. ARTHUR LEWIS
More sources of growth Suppose our x is openness to trade + + + denotes a positive effect in the direction shown +
Ireland and Greece:GNP per capita 1964-99 Case 5 Current US$, Atlas method Why?
Ireland and Greece:Investment 1960-99 (% of GDP) Investment is good for growth, but hardly explains the growth differential between Ireland and Greece
Ireland and Greece:Expenditure on education 1960-96 (% of GNP) Education is good for growth
Ireland and Greece:Exports 1960-99 (% of GNP) Foreign trade is good for growth
Madagascar and Mauritius: GNP per capita 1964-99 Case 4 Current US$, Atlas method
Exogenous vs. endogenous growth • The neoclassical view • that economic growth in the long run is merely a matter of technology does not throw much light on the spectacular growth performance of Asia since the 1960s • The new view • that long-run growth depends on saving, efficiency, and depreciation is more illuminating • Besides, it’s not really new, because Adam Smith knew this (1776)
One crucial implication of exogenous growth • The neoclassical view • If two countries are identical (same saving rate, same population growth, same technology), then their income per head will ultimately be the same • This means that poor countries must grow faster than – catch up with! – rich countries: “conditional convergence” • Endogenous growth theory does not have this implication
Enter initial income Conditional convergence + + – ? + denotes a positive effect in the direction shown + denotes a negative effect in the direction shown –
Absolute convergence? Do poor countries catch up? r = rank correlation r = -0.09 Botswana No sign that poor countries grow faster than rich China Korea Thailand Indonesia Conditional convergence does not entail absolute convergence 85 countries Nicaragua
Sources of endogenous growth I • Saving • Fits real world experience quite well • No coincidence that, in East Asia, saving rates of 30-40% of GDP went along with rapid economic growth • No coincidence either that many African economies with saving rates around 10% of GDP have been stagnant • OECD countries: saving rates of about 20% of GDP • Important implication for economic policy: • Economic stability with low inflation and positive real interest rates spurs saving, which is good for growth
Sources of endogenous growth I Income per capita East Asia 400 High saving rates 300 200 OECD Medium saving rates Africa 100 Low saving rates 1965 1990
Investment and economic growth An increase in investment by 4% of GDP is associated with an increase in per capita growth by 1% per year Botswana Thailand Jordan 1% 4% Nicaragua r = 0.65 85 countries
Sources of endogenous growth II • Efficiency • Also fits real world experience quite well • Technical progress is good for growth because it allows us to squeeze more output out of given inputs • And that is exactly what increased efficiency is all about! • Thus, technology is best viewed as an aspect of general economic efficiency • Important implication for economic policy: • Everything that increases economic efficiency, no matter what, is also good for growth
Sources of endogenous growth II • Five sources of increased efficiency • Liberalization of prices and trade increases efficiency, which is good for growth • Stabilization reduces the inefficiency associated with inflation, which is good for growth • Privatization reduces the inefficiency associated with state-owned enterprises, which … • Education makes the labor force more efficient • Technological progress also enhances efficiency • The possibilities are virtually endless!
Sources of endogenous growth II • This is good news • If growth were merely a matter of technology, we would not be able to do much about it … • … except to follow technology-friendly policies by supporting R&D and such • But if growth depends on saving and efficiency, there are things that we can do, in the private sector as well as through the public sector, to foster rapid economic growth • Because everything that is good for saving and efficiency is also good for growth
What to do to encourage economic growth • Maintain strong incentives to save • Keep inflation low and real interest rates positive • Maintain financial system in good health • so as to channel saving into high-quality investment • Foster efficiency 1. Liberal price and trade regimes 2. Low inflation 3. Strong private sector 4. More and better education 5. Limited, or well managed, natural resources 6. Reasonable equality Recap
1 Liberalization and economic growth • Liberalization of prices means that markets, not bureaucrats, are allowed to set prices • Mixed market economy is more efficient than central planning • Compare former Soviet Union with the US and Europe • Liberalization of trade allows specialization according to comparative advantage • Free trade is more efficient than self-sufficiency • North Korea and Cuba vs. Hong Kong and Singapore • Applies to trade in goods, services, capital
Openness to trade and growth 1965-98 87 countries r = 0.40 An increase in openness by 14% of GDP is associated with an increase in per capita growth by 1% per year
Openness to FDI and growth 1965-98 85 countries r = 0.62 Botswana An increase in openness to FDI by 2% of GDP is associated with an increase in per capita growth by more than 1% per year
2 Stabilization and economic growth • Stabilization of prices means that distortions associated with inflation are reduced • Inflation distorts the choice between real and financial capital by punishing money holdings, and thus creates inefficiency in production • Inflation thus involves a tax, the inflation tax • An inefficient tax compared with most other taxes • Inflation also creates uncertainly which tends to discourage trade and investment • Inflation also tends to result in overvaluation of currency, thus hurting exports and growth
3 Privatization and economic growth • Privatization means that profit-oriented owners and able managers are allowed to direct enterprises • Profit motive replaces political considerations as the guiding principle of business operations • Profit-maximizing owners generally want to appoint managers and staff on merit rather than on the basis of political connections, for example • Private enterprise is generally more efficient than state-owned enterprises
4 Education and economic growth • Education means a better trained and hence more efficient work force • Need to provide primary and secondary education to all, especially females • Need to provide tertiary education to a greatly increased number of people • Need increased public commitment to education • This requires both increased public expenditure on education and probably also increased scope for private sector involvement in education
Same story time and again • Free trade is good for growth • Reduces the inefficiency that results from restrictions on trade • Price stability is good for growth • Reduces inefficiency resulting from inflation • Privatization is good for growth • Reduces inefficiency resulting from SOEs • Education is good for growth • Reduces the inefficiency that results from inadequate education
Growth and education, 1965-98 An increase in secondary-school enrolment by 25% of each cohort goes along with an increase in per capita growth by 1% per year r = 0.72 Positive but decreasing returns to education 87 countries
5 Natural resources and economic growth • Natural resources, if not well managed, may turn out to be, at best, a mixed blessing • Four possible channels • Dutch disease • Rent seeking • Education • Investment What is the evidence?
Natural capital tends to crowd out Recent literature But Norway is, so far at least, an exception Four main linkages: • Dutch disease Hurts level or composition of exports • Rent seeking Protectionism, corruption • Education • False sense of security Poor quality of policies and institutions 5.Investment Foreign capital Social capital Human capital Real capital
Enter natural resources Dutch disease Rent seeking + + – ? – + – – Natural resource abundance hurts investment and education, and hence also growth
Natural capital and economic growth What is the empirical evidence? • A new measure of natural resource abundance • Confirms results based on other measures An increase in the natural capital share by 8% goes along with a decrease in per capita growth by 1% per year 8 Asian countries S/Y = 0.32 Australia r = rank correlation 8 African countries S/Y = 0.05 Venezuela Notice two clusters r = -0.64 85 countries
Secondary-school enrolment and natural capital Increased natural resource abundance hurts education and growth An increase in natural capital by 5% of national wealth goes along with a reduction in secondary-school enrolment by almost 10% of each cohort Finnland Uruguay Congo Vietnam r = -0.66 Niger 91 countries
Natural capital and investment An increase in the natural capital share by 10% is associated with a decrease in investment by 2% of GDP Congo Mali Sierra Leone r = -0.38 85 countries